Mind Map by , created over 6 years ago

Degree Land Law Mind Map on FREEHOLD COVENANTS, created by costafortune on 05/11/2013.

Created by costafortune over 6 years ago
Tenure & Estates Mind Map
Land Law Q1) a+b)
Life in Germany
Ben C
Whole Number Glossary L1
Lee Holness
Freehold Covenants
Faith Akinyeye
Registered Land / Overriding Interests, Implied Trusts, Adverse Possession
Jamie Roberts
Proprietary Estoppel
Faith Akinyeye
1 A contractual promise contained in a deed
1.1 2 types: Positive - requiring covenantor to do something - some physical action or financial outlay. ie build and maintain boundary
1.1.1 Negative -requiring covenantor not to do something. ie don't use building for business
1.1.2 Acid test - HAYWOOD v BRUNSWICK PERMANENT BENEFIT BUILDING SOCIETY - does the covenant require the expenditure of money? Yes = positive; No = negative
2 Covenantor - person promising to observe the covenant
2.1 Servient tenement
3 Covenantee - person with the benefit of the covenant
3.1 Dominant tenement
4 Original covenantor liable to perform the covenant until it ceases. Even if property sold on, still liable.
4.1 If original covenantor still owns property, remedy would be specific performance or an injunction, if they've moved on, remedy would be damages
4.1.1 Different rules in CL and equity. CL difficult to enforce against covenantors successors so original covenantor is vulnerable In equity, negative covenants are more easily enforced against successors
5.1 Step 1 - Proving the running of the benefit at CL
5.1.1 Benefit of both positive and negative covenants may pass by either express or implied assignment Deed may expressly transfer the benefit, but more often implied Assumed that sale will include covenants.. Consider is it useful for the land or a personal benefit? Covenant cannot be personal 4 Conditions: Covenant must touch and concern the land - either affect the land as regards it mode of occupation or the value of the land From SMITH & SNIPES HALL FARM LTD v RIVER DOUGLAS CATCHMENT BOARD X - must have been an intention that the benefit of the covenant should run with the land. Can be express or implied under s78 LPA. FEDERATED HOMES v MILL LODGE PROPERTIES LTD - s78 given a wide interpretation, a covenant is deemed to run with the land under s78 unless deed expresses otherwise! X - The covenantee (benefitter) must have had a legal estate in the dominant land X - New owner must take a legal estate in that land
5.1.2 Step 2 - Prove running of burden at CL AUSTERBERRY v OLDHAM CORPORATION says that, at CL, burden of covenant cannot run with the land Confirmed in RHONE v STEPHENS Ways around the rule but in majority of situations, exceptions won't help The rule in HALZALL v BRIZELL - mutual benefit/burden rule if land has benefit of an agreement, he cannot avoid the associated burden of it. ie easement to use driveway coupled with covenant to maintain it Operation of a chain of indemnity covenants - but if one person dies or is untraceable, chain broken and original covenantor is still liable Positive easements - (spurious easements) relate to cattle trespassing, rarely applied Positive easements - CROW v WOOD - says a covenant to fence may be an easement Enlargement of long leases - s153 LPA 1925 Rights of re-entry/rent charges - payment of rent which allows owner to enter land and carry out work if necessary

Media attachments