Utilitarianism - created from Mind Map

Description

A Levels Philosophy Note on Utilitarianism - created from Mind Map, created by emmakidd on 25/03/2014.
emmakidd
Note by emmakidd, updated more than 1 year ago More Less
emmakidd
Created by emmakidd about 10 years ago
emmakidd
Copied to Note by emmakidd about 10 years ago
834
1

Resource summary

Page 1

Act Utilitarianism Benthamite Mill Bentham believes all pleasure & pain equal - some pleasures are not "superior" Bentham used the Hedonic Calculus to decide whether or not an action is "right" Believed Utilitarianism should be the guide legislator of laws/rules Believed Utilitarianism was not a "new" system - this is the way that humans have always operated Bentham Philanthropist (performs generous/benevolant actions) Social reformer Supported Believed there is no such thing as natural justice - rights are only given to us by law Founder of Utilitarianism 1748-1832 Believed in prison/legal reforms Saw society as a collection of individuals Decriminalisation of homosexuality Seperation of church and state Abolition of death penalty Abolition of slavery Did not believe in the good of the community being put above the good of the individual Agreed with Utilitarianism's central tenets Disagreed that all pleasures and pains are equal 1806-1873 Was extremely well educated A response to Utilitarinism being called a "philosophy for pigs" "It is quite compatible with the principle of utility to recognise the fact that some kinds of pleasure are more desirable and more valuable than others" - Mill Why Intellectual pleasures are just intrinsically better They have a "greater permanency, safety, uncostliness etc" PURER pleasure, more FECUNDITY

Rule Utilitarianism An action is right if it conforms to the rule that has the greatest good Rule utilitarians argue that acting for the immediate good isn't always for the greatest good Eg. executing the innocent man to avoid a riot may be for the immediate greatest good but would it be right in the long run as it would result in a world in which people have no rights

Preference Utilitarianism Goal: a "satisfaction of desires" instead of decrease pain/increase utility Established by Peter Singer We should act on the preference of the individual unless it is outweighed by the preference of someone else This preference could be avoid pain, experience utility To fulfil this, you need to work out people's deisires and attempt to develop them However, can be more complex than this eg a human may have a preference to establish and maintain a healthy relationship, whilst a pig may have a preference to roll in mud Condones abortion (particularly in the early stages) Singer believes in vegetarianism, as preference utilitarianism is extended to all sentient beings Weighs up mother's preference to foetus's pain - mother is rational and conscious so it outweighs Still sees humans as "higher" than animals - if one had to eat meat to survive, this would be permissible in preference utilitarianism. Singer believes that an animal's preference to not get eaten outweighs a human's preference to eat meat

Negative Utilitarianism Karl Popper Focus on minimisation of suffering, not maximisation of happiness People tend to think we should end human suffering More realistic (?) - people mostly try to avoid pain more

Advantages Comes from a time when there were great social divides and treats all individuals as equal "The good" and "the bad" are metaphysical concepts - Utilitarianism says that these are physical concepts eg pain and utility Avoids conflict of duties - eg keep a promise or tell a lie, utilitarianism tells us to do the one that will result in the most utility, least pain etc Takes consequences into account and allows for complex scenarios (unlike deontological) "each is to count for one, none to count for more than one" Could extend (arguably) to all sentient beings "the question is not, can they reason? nor can they talk? but can they suffer?" - Bentham Peter Singer

Disadvantages Rule util Act Util There are examples in which keeping to a rule can lead to more pain and less utility - contradiction? Theoretically, any leisure activities are morally wrong, as this time could be spent doing charity work Can disregard rights of individuals

Central Tenets Consequencialist system- not interested in the actions as long as the outcome itself is "right "It is the greatest happiness for the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong" - Bentham Only interested in utility/pain from action

HEDONIC CALCULUS: - INTENSITY - DURATION - CERTAINTY - PROPINQUITY (how soon will    the pleasure occur?) - FECUNDITY (probability that the action will be followed by sensations of a similar kind) - PURITY - EXTENT

"The rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance" - Garner and Rosen

align_clippings_on_this_page_please

Utilitarianism

Annotations

Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

Breakdown of Philosophy
rlshindmarsh
Who did what now?...Ancient Greek edition
Chris Clark
Reason and Experience Plans
rlshindmarsh
The Cosmological Argument
Summer Pearce
AS Philosophy Exam Questions
Summer Pearce
Philosophy of Art
mccurryby
"The knower's perspective is essential in the pursuit of knowledge." To what extent do you agree?
nataliaapedraza
The Ontological Argument
daniella0128
Religious Experience
alexandramchugh9
Chapter 6: Freedom vs. Determinism Practice Quiz
Kristen Gardner
Environmental Ethics
Jason Edwards-Suarez