Notas
week 10 2.0
Conteúdo das notas (1)
Página 1
wWeek 10: Health
Disclaimer: this may seem like a
disillusioned onslaught of my personal thoughts on health-related issues. It
isn’t. I am just so invigorated about this topic after leading class discussion
on the topic of health this week. I may not cover everything we discussed in
class; however, I will dabble in issues currently un-discussed in class.
Firstly,
the discussion of health centers on the term health. The medical model
definition defines health is narrow terms of as the “absence of
disease”(Connor, 413). The World Health Organization offers a more holistic and
complex definition, “ a state of complete physical, mental, and social
well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”(ibid, 413). The
significance to draw from the WHO’s definition is that health is an intrinsic part of development because it deals so
closely with the basics of human life, “these broad global and community
definitions confirm health as an integral aspect of development, and
demonstrate the significance of development as a major public health issue”(ibid,
414).
Likewise,
dissent over the term health inequalities
causes a similar conceptual framework divergence. Several definitions can
be considered in our understandings of health inequalities:
·
"variations in health status
across individuals in a population"( E.E. Gakidou)
·
"where the chances of good
or bad health are not evenly distributed among groups of people (defined b the
area in which they live or work, or so other common characteristic), we say
that there is health inequality " (M. Shaw)
·
"inequalities refer to
relative health status- between rich and poor, men and women, ethnic groups,
regions, or simply between the most healthy and least healthy"( R.G.A.
Feacham)
What all these definitions have in common is
that all the above definitions recognize that health varies between countries
and amongst different groups of people within countries (cross country
comparisons), allows for determining what is causing health inequality
(Barrett, 424).
To
shift into a discussion on our conceptualizations in relation to the right to health (as related to week 6,
discussions on human rights and indigenous rights), an assertion Connor makes
in “Managing Health and Disease in Developing Countries”, he said “each
individual has a basic responsibility to value their own health”(414). This
seems understandable if one is in the frame of mind that with rights come
responsibilities. Therefore the right to
health should incite a responsibility to
value ones own health. However, how does this play into issues of infectious
disease, it would seem that if one takes on the responsibility to value and
maintain their health then there should be a considerable reduction in
transmitted disease. One we highlighted in our presentation was HIV/AIDS that
is “transmitted through the exchange of bodily fluids, including semen, vaginal
secretions, blood and breast milk”(Miller and Sabin, 407). A disease that
causes considerable harm not only to the individual, but further extends to all
of their society, which further gives obligations of that individual’s responsibility to maintain their health:
·
“family members absorb the
greatest burden of HIV/AIDS, caring for children, earning an income, and
holding the family together”(Miller and Sabin, 410)
·
“orphaned children”(ibid, 410)
·
“assessing development impacts
may be impossible because individuals [with HIV/AIDS], households and firms,
especially in hard-hit communities, can virtually disappear, leaving little
evidence of impacts, despite profound societal changes”(ibid, 409)
Obviously all of the above speaks to the
pervasive nature of poor health within communities, these negative effects are
heightened especially because of the nature of HIV/AIDS as an autoimmune
disease, which when contracted increases the infected individuals likelihood of
catching other deadly disease such as tuberculosis, malaria and hepatitis. This
sparks a discussion on the appeal of national health care so that more can
achieve better ‘health’ standards and thus decrease the spread of such
infectious and easily transmitted diseases. Canada currently has national
health care controlled by each province, and recently South Africa has taken
steps towards instituting a national health care program. Started in 2012, and
to be phased in over the course of fourteen years, currently quality health
care could only be found in the private sector, however access to which was
unattainable for most of the population, often those most in need of services
and treatment because ill health is so closely tied to poverty, “poverty and
social conditions play an important role in the distribution and persistence of
disease”(Connor, 414). By having a national health care scheme it makes the
health care of someone else every citizens responsibility. The Health Minister
of South Africa, Aaron Motsoaledi said in a BBC news report, “if you earn above
a certain income you will be required by law to make contributions to the
National Health Insurance (NHI) Fund. It will not be possible to get out of
this responsibility”(South Africa Unveils
Universal Health Care Scheme). However, this then of course comes back to
the issue of a person having the basic responsibility to value their own
health, if their community is working to support an individual’s health but
they do not value their own health, should the community still be affording
them assistance in maintain good health if they do not take steps to maintain
their own health?
Should the NHI pay for the treatment of a man
who has contracted HIV/AIDS because he knowingly bought sex from a prostitute
who had HIV/AIDS and choose to have unprotected sex?
Should NHI pay for the treatment of a woman
who drove recklessly and crashed her car while driving under the influence of
alcohol?
Should the NHI pay for the treatment of youth
who overdose on illegal drugs and drink alcohol while under the legal drinking
age?
Should the NHI pay for treatments of
fat-reduction for those who have obesity because they did not maintain a
healthy lifestyle with exercise and now are obese because of overeating and
unhealthy eating practices?
Should the NHI pay for the treatment of
smokers who have developed lung cancer due to smoking, even though they
knowingly knew (warnings on packaging) the incredibly increased risks of
developing the disease due to smoking?
Have these citizens neglected their health responsibility and therefore should
forfeit their health rights?
Works Cited:
Barrett, Hazel R. “Health Inequalities”. The
Companion to Development Studies. Ed. Vandana Desai and Robert B. Potter. 2
ed. London: Hodder Arnold Group, 2008.
423427. Print.
Connor, S. "Managing health and disease
in developing countries," in Desai, V. and Potter, R.B. (eds.) The
Companion to Development Studies. London: Hodder Arnold Group. 2002
Feachman, R.G.A. “Poverty and Inequality: a
proper focus for the new country”. Buletin
of the World Health Organization (2000): 1-2. Print.
Gakidou, E.E. “Defining and measuring health
inequality: differences across urban and rural areas”. International Journal for Equality in Health (2000): 42-54. Print.
Sabin, L. and Miller, C. "The
development impacts of HIV/AIDS," in Desai, V. and Potter, R.B. (eds.) The
Companion to Development Studies. London: Hodder Arnold Group. 2002.
Shaw, M. Health,
Place and Society. London: Pearson Education. 2002. Print.
“South Africa Unveils Universal Health Care
Scheme” BBC 12 August 2011: Print.
Informações
- Descrição
- Notas sobre week 10 2.0, criado por kelleyhumber em 28-03-2015.
- Criado por
- kelleyhumber
- Visualizações
- 1
- Avaliação