Quiz
Concept 4 Practice Quiz
Crie uma conta grátis para terminar este quiz
Salve seu progresso e veja sua nota final.
Já tem uma conta? Inicie sessão
Perguntas do quiz (13)
1Regardless of your intent, if you restrict the freedom of a person to move and they are not free to go you have arrested them.
- AVerdadeiro
- BFalso
2According to the SCOTUS, an investigative detention (Terry stop) is an arrest for Fourth Amendment purposes.
- AVerdadeiro
- BFalso
3When an official takes a person into custody and holds the person for anywhere between a few hours to a few days to answer for a criminal charge, the official has conducted a ___________.
- ALawful arrest
- BUnlawful arrest
- CCustodial arrest
- DIntrusive arrest
- ETerry arrest
4Under which of the following traffic offense circumstances can an officer arrest a violator without a warrant under Arkansas law?
- Adeath or physical injury to a person
- Bdamage to property
- Cdriving a vehicle while under the influence of any intoxicating liquor or drug
- Dall of the answers listed
5All arrests must be based on __________ to be legal.
- Aa mere hunch
- Breasonable suspicion
- Cprobable cause
- Dpreponderance of the evidence
- Eproof beyond a reasonable doubt
6In ___________, the SCOTUS established that hearsay can be used to establish probable cause (but not to establish guilt in criminal court).
- ADraper v. United States
- BBrown v. Mississippi
- CMapp v. Ohio
- DCalifornia v. Hodari D.
- EAtwater v. City of Lago Vista
7An arrest warrant is an order, issued by a senior law enforcement officer, directing a specific law enforcement officer to take a named person into custody and bring them before the court.
- AVerdadeiro
- BFalso
8An arrest warrant expires after 60 days because the information used to establish probable cause is “stale.”
- AVerdadeiro
- BFalso
9The particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment applies to:
- AArrest warrants
- BSearch warrants
- CArrest warrants and search warrants
- DNeither arrest warrants nor search warrants
10According to SCOTUS in Chimel v. California, involving the search of a house incident to an arrest for burglary of a coin shop:
- Ait is not reasonable to search a person who is lawfully arrested.
- Bit is not reasonable to search an entire house incident to a lawful arrest.
- Cthe Fourth Amendment does not protect searches incident to lawful arrests.
- Dpolice must always have search warrants to search persons.
11When police arrest a suspect based on probable cause, but then conduct a search without probable cause or a warrant, the search is called a:
- Aconsent search
- Bsearch incident to arrest
- Cstop-and-frisk search
- Dpretext search
12The __________ approach to reasonableness focuses exclusively on the law enforcement officer's state of mind at the time of the seizure.
- Aobjective
- Bsubjective
- Clegalistic
- Dbureaucratic
- Ecommon law
13Unlike with searches, there is no presumption that the police need a warrant to conduct a seizure.
- AVerdadeiro
- BFalso
Informações
- Descrição
- CRJU 3003 Quiz sobre Concept 4 Practice Quiz, criado por Adam Peterson em 19-06-2018.
- Autor
- Adam Peterson
- Idioma
- English
- Visualizações
- 31
- Etiquetas
- Avaliação
- Ainda sem avaliações Avalie este quiz