O GoConqr está de visual novo! Conte para nós o que você achou.

Registre-se grátis

Quiz

Materials development for language learning and teaching - Tomlinson

diana.marsella.1 10 perguntas

Fazer o quiz

Este quiz tem tempo limite, por isso abre no player de sempre.

Perguntas do quiz (10)

  1. 1Do ‘Materials development’ refer to all the processes made use of by practitioners who produce and/or use materials for language learning, including materials evaluation, their adaptation, design, production, exploitation and research?Imagem da pergunta 1
    1. AVerdadeiro
    2. BFalso
  2. 2Tick the sources consider as Materials for Language LearningImagem da pergunta 2
    1. ACoursebooks Imagem da opção A
    2. BWebsites obile phone interactionsImagem da opção B
    3. CVideosImagem da opção C
    4. DGraded readersImagem da opção D
    5. EVideo gamesImagem da opção E
    6. FFlash cardsImagem da opção F
    7. GGamesImagem da opção G
    8. HComputersImagem da opção H
  3. 3Materials can be:Imagem da pergunta 3
    1. AEfforingImagem da opção A
    2. BInformativeImagem da opção B
    3. CInstructiveImagem da opção C
    4. DDesirableImagem da opção D
    5. EExperientialImagem da opção E
    6. FExploratoyImagem da opção F
    7. GSubsequentlyImagem da opção G
  4. 4Tomlinson & Masuhara (2004: 7) proposed the following questions for evaluating criteria:
    a) Is each question an [blank_start]evaluation[blank_end] question?
    b) Does each question [blank_start]only ask[blank_end] one question?
    c) Is each question [blank_start]answerable[blank_end]?
    d) Is each question free of [blank_start]dogma[blank_end]?
    e) Is each question [blank_start]reliable in the sense[blank_end] that other evaluators would [blank_start]interpret[blank_end] it in the same
    way?    Imagem da pergunta 4
    1. Aevaluation
    2. Bonly ask
    3. Canswerable
    4. Ddogma
    5. Einterpret
    6. Freliable in the sense
  5. 5Many reports on micro-evaluations of materials are written for sponsors of projects or for publishers and are, understandably, confidential. Some reports of evaluations of materials in action are dotted throughout the literature but are rarely collected in one volume or issue.Some reports of evaluations of materials in action are dotted throughout the literature but are rarely collected in one volume or issue. This is a point made by Ellis (2011: 234), who adds that such micro-evaluations are: Imagem da pergunta 5
    1. AAlways seen as not localised and big scale, and so theoretically interesting.
    2. BOften seen as too localised and too small scale, and so theoretically uninteresting.
    3. CNever seen as localised and middle scale, and so theoretically unuseful
  6. 6Which Author did suggest that: 'Providing the learners with an important role in adapting the materials they are using. In order to involve learners in the process, she proposes that materials should actually be written with learner adaptation in mind, aiming to be learner-centred, flexible, open-ended, relevant, universal and authentic, and giving choices to learners.'?Imagem da pergunta 6
    1. AMcDonough & Shaw (2003
    2. BMadsen & Bowen (1978)
    3. CCunningsworth (1984)
    4. DSaraceni (2003)
  7. 7Tomlinson & Masuhara (2004: 11) aim ‘to [blank_start]help[blank_end] teachers to [blank_start]reflect[blank_end] upon their own [blank_start]practice[blank_end]
    and [blank_start]identify[blank_end] principles and [blank_start]systematic procedures[blank_end] for materials adaptation’.     Imagem da pergunta 7
    1. Ahelp
    2. Bcreate
    3. Creflect
    4. Dunderstand
    5. Eperformance
    6. Fpractice
    7. Gidentify
    8. Hdefine
    9. Ilinear operations
    10. Jsystematic procedures
  8. 8Organice the 3 main aspect of 'Materials production'
    1 [blank_start]How writers write[blank_end]
    2 [blank_start]Principled development of materials[blank_end]
    3 [blank_start]Practical guidance to writers[blank_end]    Imagem da pergunta 8
    1. AHow writers write
    2. BPrincipled development of materials
    3. CPractical guidance to writers
  9. 9What is the most common Approach in English coursebooks ?Imagem da pergunta 9
    1. ATPR (Total Physical Response)
    2. BSilent Way
    3. CPPP (Presentation, Practice and Production)
  10. 10In the last forty years [blank_start]materials development[blank_end] has progressed dramatically, both as [blank_start]an academic field[blank_end] and as [blank_start]a practical undertaking[blank_end]. We are now much more aware of the [blank_start]principles and procedures[blank_end] of materials development that are most likely to [blank_start]facilitate language acquisition[blank_end] and development and are much better at actually [blank_start]developing effective materials[blank_end]. Teachers also seem to be more [blank_start]constructively critical[blank_end] of their coursebooks and to be more willing, confident and able to localise and [blank_start]personalise their coursebooks[blank_end] for their learners.Imagem da pergunta 10
    1. Amaterials development
    2. Ban academic field
    3. Ca practical undertaking
    4. Dprinciples and procedures
    5. Efacilitate language acquisition
    6. Fconstructively critical
    7. Gdeveloping effective materials
    8. Hpersonalise their coursebooks

Informações

Descrição
http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 16 May 2012 IP address: 131.111.127.89 Lang. Teach. (2012), 45.2 , 143–179 c  Cambridge University Press 2012 doi:10.1017/S0261444811000528 State-of-the-Art Article Materials development for language learning and teaching Brian Tomlinson Leeds Metropolitan University brianjohntomlinson@gmail.com
Idioma
Español
Visualizações
257
Avaliação
Ainda sem avaliações
Avalie este quiz
Avalie este quiz

Fale Conosco

Sobre o que é sua mensagem?

O que você acha do novo visual?

Você gostou?