Quiz
Cases
Este quiz tem tipos de pergunta que abrem no player de sempre.
Perguntas do quiz (7)
1'Where actions of victim are reasonably foreseeable it does not break the chain of causation'
- ARobert
- BWhite
- CHennessey
- DQuick
- EBollum
2'sexual infidelity alone cannot constitute a qualifying trigger'
- AVerdadeiro
- BFalso
3In [blank_start]Hennessey[blank_end], [blank_start]hyperglycaemia[blank_end] was considered [blank_start]insanity[blank_end] as it was [blank_start]internal[blank_end]. Whereas [blank_start]hypoglycaemia[blank_end] was considered [blank_start]automatism[blank_end] in [blank_start]Quick[blank_end].
- AHennessey
- BQuick
- CEvans
- DLamb
- Ehyperglycaemia
- Fhypoglycaemia
- Ginsanity
- Hdiminished responsibility
- Iself defence
- Jloss of control
- Kautomatism
- Linternal
- Mexternal
- Nhypoglycaemic
- OAutomatism
- Pquick
4Medical negligence does not break the chain of causation - [blank_start]Cheshire[blank_end]
Factual causation - but for test - [blank_start]White[blank_end]
Take the victim as you find them - [blank_start]Blaue[blank_end]- ACheshire
- BWhite
- CBlaue
5[blank_start]Burn[blank_end] - irresistible impulse, unable to help yourself perform your actions.
[blank_start]M'Naghten[blank_end] - defect of reason resulting from disease of the mind, unable to know nature of acts and that they are wrong.
[blank_start]Sullivan[blank_end] - epilepsy considered disease of the mind for insanity.
[blank_start]Dieschmann[blank_end] - Mere intoxication is to be disregarded for purposes of deciding diminished responsibility.
[blank_start]Gladstone[blank_end] - subjective beliefe that force use was necessary.
[blank_start]Scarlett[blank_end], [blank_start]Clegg[blank_end] - Cannot use excessive force, it must be reasonable and proportionate.
[blank_start]Wood[blank_end] - Intoxication can be the root of a medical condition for diminished responsibility.- ABurn
- BM'Naghten
- CSullivan
- DDieschmann
- EGladstone
- FScarlett
- GClegg
- HWood
6[blank_start]Bollum[blank_end] - seriousness of gbh can be determined by the [blank_start]impact[blank_end] on that specific individual.
[blank_start]Church[blank_end] - act needs to be [blank_start]dangerous[blank_end] in sense of creating the risk of [blank_start]some[blank_end] physical harm albeit not serious harm.
[blank_start]Savage and Parmenter[blank_end] - intention or [blank_start]recklessness[blank_end] as to either a specific non fatal offence or as to some harm albeit not [blank_start]serious[blank_end] harm.
[blank_start]Belfrom[blank_end] - [blank_start]intent to cause[blank_end] really serious harm i.e. gbh.
[blank_start]Ireland[blank_end] - [blank_start]silence[blank_end] can constitute an assault as well as abh.
Bollum, [blank_start]Chan Fook[blank_end] - Need for medical evidence in establishing a [blank_start]psychiatric[blank_end] assault as basis of [blank_start]abh[blank_end].
[blank_start]Donovan[blank_end], [blank_start]Miller[blank_end] - Any hurt or injury interfering with the [blank_start]health[blank_end] and comfort of the victim. Need not be permanemt but more than transient and trifling.
[blank_start]DPP[blank_end] v [blank_start]Smith[blank_end] - [blank_start]gbh[blank_end] is really serious harm.- ABollum
- BChurch
- CBelfrom
- DIreland
- EChan Fook
- FDonovan
- GMiller
- HDPP
- ISmith
- Jabh
- Kgbh
- Ldangerous
- Msome
- Nimpact
- OSavage and Parmenter
- Precklessness
- Qserious
- Rintent to cause
- Ssilence
- Tpsychiatric
- Uhealth
7[blank_start]Lowe[blank_end] - liability imposed by statute
[blank_start]Pittwood[blank_end] - liability imposed by contract
[blank_start]Evans[blank_end], [blank_start]Stone and Dobinson[blank_end] - Liability through special relationship and assuming responsibility by conduct.
[blank_start]Woolin[blank_end] - Virtual certainty that consequence of Ds conduct will result and D appreciated this.
[blank_start]Mohan[blank_end]- aim or purpose of D.
[blank_start]Lamb[blank_end] - Unlawful act must be a criminal act from which to construct liabilty form manslaughter.
[blank_start]Bailey[blank_end] - Reckless awareness of condition, prior fault.
[blank_start]Adomako[blank_end] - Gross negligence, falling so far below expected standard as to justify a criminal conviction.
[blank_start]Miller[blank_end] - Creating a dangerous situation and failing to rectify it.- ALowe
- BPittwood
- CEvans
- DStone and Dobinson
- EWoolin
- FMohan
- GLamb
- HBailey
- IAdomako
- JMiller
Informações
- Descrição
- Quiz sobre Cases, criado por Katie Bovington em 14-12-2015.
- Autor
- Katie Bovington
- Idioma
- English
- Visualizações
- 0
- Histórico
- Criado em 14 dez 2015 · atualizado em 6 abr 2018
- Etiquetas
- Avaliação
- Ainda sem avaliações Avalie este quiz