O GoConqr está de visual novo! Conte para nós o que você achou.

Fluxograma

EBT1

Diego Lema Velásquez Espanhol

Lema Velásquez Diego Fernando Játiva Mafla Edwin Joel Paspuel Mueses Scarleth Malena Anita Cecilia López Paredes

Conteúdo do fluxograma

  1. The Role of Inferential Ability in Listening Comprehension in English as a Foreign Language

  2. Abstract

  3. In general, speakers do not always provide all necessary information that they refer to and that theyonly utter the most obvious pieces of information for listeners to supply as bridging assumptions.

  4. Inferential abilityrequires listeners to connect linguistic and other cues and to use background knowledge.

  5. Key words: listening comprehension, inference, inferential ability, English as a foreign language

  6. Introduction

  7. The term ‘inferentialability’ is uses to describe an ability to;

  8. Extract relevant information which is not explicitly given to listeners,

  9. Reconstruct relevant information from both linguistic and non-linguistic clues

  10. Understand what a speaker really means at pragmatic level in EFL.

  11. The experiment with a brief review of existing literature

  12. There were several experiments with students readers, which after reading a book was better answering literal questions than inferential ones.

  13. This is because so much information was not stored in their long-term memory

  14. unlike those who already had previous information about this text, for example, listeners of online texts.

  15. 8 characteristics of spoken language make thelistening process difficult;

  16. i) clustering

    ii) redundancy

    iii) reduced forms

    iv) performance variables

    v) colloquial language

    vi) rate of delivery

    vii) stress, rhythm, and intonation

    viii) interaction

  17. Linguistic level

  18. There are four different levels;

  19. 1) phonetic/phonological,

    2) lexical/semantic,

    3) grammatical,

    4) pragmatic.

  20. The first intent or meaning is the informational intent, or sentence meaning, and the second intent or meaning is the communicative intent, or speaker's meaning (Leech 1983; Sperber and Wilson 1986).

  21. The ability to understand and produce a communicative act is referred to as pragmatic competence (Kasper 1997) which often includes one's knowledge about social distance,

  22. differences in social status between the speakers involved, cultural knowledge, e.g. rules of courtesy, and linguistic knowledge, both explicit and implicit.

  23. Types

  24. Buck (1991) suggests that there are five different inferential types from the standpoint of listening comprehension testing:

  25. NU refers to the listener being unable to draw any appropriate inference based on what a speaker has just said.

  26. MU refers to a conflict between the kind of inference the speaker expected the listener to draw from the speaker's utterances and the inferences the listener has actually drawn.

  27. AU refers to the inferences drawn by a listener that are satisfactory to both the speaker and the listener. YOUR understanding denotes a specific interpretation that was intended by the speaker.

  28. Problems

  29. We are able to only deduce what the listeners did with themessage and what they found difficult by examining their response

  30. whether this is spoken,written or non-verbal.

  31. There are at least six discernible problems,

  32. To define in some way what it means to say that someone‘knows’ a certain thing.

  33. To test the person’s knowledge.

  34. No details of the process is available/observable.

  35. Fluid/constantly adaptable from the text.

  36. Missing description (of schemata).

  37. Loose notion.

  38. Pedagogical implications

  39. listeners andreaders must be aware of the important role of inferential ability in listening comprehension inEnglish as a foreign language

  40. Andersonand Lynch (1988) introduce the following learner strategies along with the problems:

  41. 1) Ambiguity of reference:Finding an appropriate gloss for theitem being used in the discourse.

  42. 2) Continuity of co-reference;

  43. fully repeated form

  44. a partially repeated form

  45. with a lexical substitution

  46. with a pronominal form

  47. 3) Unfamiliarity with specialised jargon

  48. 4) Lexical fuzziness

  49. 5) Multiple co-reference possibilities

  50. 6) Unlikely reference

  51. The following pedagogical implementations might be helpfu to teachesl to listeners:

  52. To teach the role of inferential ability in listening comprehension in EFL classrooms

  53. To teach general knowledge and generic concepts.

  54. To help learners build schemata and encourage them to make connections between ideas.

  55. Group N°2

  56. Lema Velásquez Diego Fernando

    Játiva Mafla Edwin Joel

    Paspuel Mueses Scarleth Malena

    Anita Cecilia López Paredes

  57. Examples

  58. It is mainly divided into two central categories

  59. inference ability related to prior knowledge

  60. importance of the role of prior knowledge in

  61. Process

  62. First you organize things into different groups

  63. It is important not to do things. That is, it is better to do too few things than too many. Short term

  64. It may not seem easy, but complications can easily arise.

  65. Once the procedure is completed, the materials are organized again in different groups

  66. Many readers listeners may find this text somewhat difficult to understand, however, since the title is 'Laundromat', it is very clear that the title provides a context in which appropriate background knowledge can be applied.

  67. This learning theory views organized knowledge as an elaborate network of abstract mental structures that represent self understanding.

  68. The Role of Inferential Ability in Listening Comprehension in English as a Foreign Language(UEDA)

  69. Schemata are always organized meaningfully, can be added to, and, as an individual gainsexperience, develop to include more variables and more specificity.

  70. Schemata change moment by moment as information is received.

  71. The mental representations used combine to form a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts.

  72. Lema Velásquez Diego Fernando Játiva Mafla Edwin Joel Paspuel Mueses Scarleth Malena Anita Cecilia López Paredes
  73. Group N°2
  74. The experiment with a brief review of existing literature

Informações

Descrição
Fluxograma sobre EBT1, criado por Diego Lema Velásquez em 18-04-2022.
Visualizações
0
Histórico
  • Criado por Diego Lema Velásquez · 18 abr 2022
  • Copiado por Diego Lema Velásquez · 18 abr 2022
  • Copiado por Diego Lema Velásquez · 18 abr 2022
Avaliação

Fale Conosco

Sobre o que é sua mensagem?

O que você acha do novo visual?

Você gostou?