O GoConqr está de visual novo! Conte para nós o que você achou.

Mapa mental

M006 Conflict of interest

alison_patey0437 Inglês

Mind map on conflict of interest dispute resolution: conflict avoidance, adjudication, arbitration and ADR

Mind map: Conflict of interest dispute resolution

Conteúdo do mapa

M006 Conflict of interest

  1. Standard form of contract deal with Conflict avoidance and DR

    • ICE, NEC & JCT have adopted adjudication
      • effecive after incorporation of HGCRA Act 1996
      • now statutory requirement of UK contracts
      • decision in 28 days
    • difference between UK Adjudication and FIDIC adjudication
      • UK requirement based on statue
      • FIDIC is a contract based requirement
        • FIDIC 1999 form of contract inc DAB (dispute Adjudication Boards) provision 1 or 3 members. its contractual and all parties to abide by decision
          • DAB provision
            • standing disputes board
            • standing body and visits site reg.
            • 84 days 2 make a decision
            • decision is final and binding if no notice of disatifaction if given
  2. Hierachy of DR

    • 1. Negotiaiton
      • 2. Mediation
        • 3. Conciliation
          • 4. Early neutral evaluation
            • 5. Expert determination
              • 6. Adjudication
                • 7. Arbritration/litigation
                  • arbitration: resolve disputes under control of the parties; conditions met e.g. idena genuine dispute, binding agreement 2 submit 2 arb in contract;
                  • Arbitration procedures:
                    • docs only - 30days
                    • short hearing - 30 days
                    • full hearing - long
                  • Difference between Arbitration & litiation
                    • Arbitration:
                      • governed by Arbitration Act 1996
                      • in order 2 arb u must have agreement from both parties
                      • parties have a degree of discretion as to they way proccedings r conducted
                      • similiar 2 litigation in sense of formal submission, expert evidence, hearing & decision by arbitrator
                      • 3 types:
                        • Short hearing - 1 month
                        • Docs only - 1 month
                        • full procedure - long
                      • Advantages: private; parties have flex; arb awards easier 2 enforce
                      • Confidential/ private
                    • Litigation:
                      • presentation of argument in court
                      • public process - follow Civil Proceudure Rule
                      • Advantages: parties don't pay 4 judge/court, speedy & efficient, process can deal with multi parites, Civil Procedure rules = accessibility
                      • good 4 multi-party disputes
                  • Litigation: last resort 2 settle disputes by an action in court of law
                    • Advantages:
                      • 3rd parties can join in on dispute
                      • legal aid avaliable
                      • less expensive than ARB
                      • decisive approach by judge
                    • Disadvantages:
                      • time consuming & unclear results
                • Uk stat DR procedure; relitively quick from submission 2 referral; binding until dispute determined by litigation/arbritation
                  • enforcement in contracts by HGCRA 1996
                    • applies to all E/S/W contracts
                  • if there r no provisions for Adj in contract = Scheme 4 construction contracts applies
                  • its a stat right 2 have adj assuming the contract qualifies under the construction act. if not scheme 4 construction contracts applies
              • resolution by qual. person exp in subject under dispute. they decide the outcome
              • ADVANTAGES:
                • Rapid
                • binding
                • cheap
                • private
                • court gives support to its outcomes/ rulings
            • is a non binding assessment by a neutral professional. this could be used as a bias for settlement
          • Similar 2 mediation; independant party 2 aid agreement; conciliator = no auth 2 seek evidence of call witness; coniliator = makes NO decisions.
            • Difference between Mediation & conciliation:
              • Mediation: brings parties 2gether & agree based on careful approach which best suits both parties
              • conciliation: doesnt try to bring parties together and agrees through a 3rd party acting as a broker
        • ADR - sep 3rd pty 2 mediate & guide a decision optimising parties needs; med encourages coming 2gether and agreeing
          • Centre for effetive dispute resolution CEDR
            • can provide 2 prj mediators 4 a mth retainer 2 a prj
              • attend prj meetings 2 discuss progress - deal with any prb
              • prj mediation w.shop is arranged prior 2 contract commencement - to resolve any conflict using CEDR model mediation procedure
      • parties may through formal/informal process agree to settle the dipute either at high level or in detail & agree 2 b bound by this settlement
        • Success of negotiation: both parties come away happy, costs agreed
    • 1 to 6 are ADR procedures
  3. Conflict Avoidance

    • 2 methods
      • management methods
        • reduce risk through better planning e.g. ensuring contract docs are prepared properly & r clear and precise
        • Project & business structures: e.g. partnering/ integrated project teams, using appropriate procurement methods; emp good value management
      • non escalation methods
        • resolving disputes b4 they escalate: e.g. structured negotiation, tired DR mechanisms in contrats
          • using appropriate procurement practice
          • sufficient preparation and tender planning
          • complete design in all respects
          • selection construction contracts e.g NEC/ECC
          • contract docs clear and precise
          • utilising project business structures which reduce risk of disputes e.g. partnering
          • adopt good proj & commercial man practicies
          • pre-contract reviews 2 avoid any issues
          • periodical risk reviews
          • tiered DR mechanisms in contrats
          • use of dispute board and prj mediation
    • project CA
      • client decide what he wants (time, cost, qual, early start)
      • decide appropriate procurement route
      • know the deal with MC - allowcation of risk
      • put in writing all agreed terms & contract docs
      • single pt of responsibility e.g. avoid dispute through bad comminucation
      • ensure the client is always aware of scope/fee inc and costs through financial reporting
  4. What is dispute resolution?

    • actions 2 resolve contractural disputes
  5. Adjudication

    • not legally binding
    • adj forms an opinion based on evidence
    • parties may accept decision or may agreed to take dispute to a legally binding arbitration or commence litigation
    • referring party: give notice to all others 2 go 4 arbitration
    • fee for adjudication - paid by both parties
      • "pay now, argue later" method adopted in Adj
    • Quick & cost effective
    • Advantages:
      • Independent assessment
      • quick decision
      • binding for duration of contract wrks
      • can b reassessed after completion of wrks
    • Disadvantages:
      • Quick decision
      • used as an ambushing tactic
      • can b reassessed after wks complete
  6. Adjudication vs Arbitration

    • Arbitration :
      • consentual process
      • no time limit
      • legally binding
    • Adjudication:
      • right by statute
      • time is limited
      • not legally binding
  7. Arbitration

    • settlement of a dispute by an Arbitrator
    • Arbitrator decides the case and award
    • judgement can b incorporated in 2 decree or court
    • Decision = arb knowledge, evidence, enquiries 2
    • Arbitration Act 1996
      • led to the drafting of 2 sets of rules
        • CIMAR (con ind model arb rules 1996)
        • ICE arb procedures 1997
    • Advantages:
      • cheap
      • Quick
      • suitable 4 complex tech matters
      • conveinient
      • private
      • commercially expedient
  8. The Technology and Construction Court (TCC)

  9. The 4 C's of ADR

    • Consensus (2 find a business solution)
    • Continuity (solution 4 on going business relationship
    • Control (ability 2 tailor a solution geared 4 a business result)
    • Confidentiality (avoid harmful revelations 2 the public

Informações

Descrição
Mapa Mental sobre M006 Conflict of interest, criado por alison_patey0437 em 29-04-2013.
Visualizações
168
Avaliação

Fale Conosco

Sobre o que é sua mensagem?

O que você acha do novo visual?

Você gostou?