RESEARCH INTO DAYCARE

DISADVANTAGE
1. (USA) NICHD
  1. AIM
    1. EFFECTS OF CHILDCARE ON CHILDREN
  2. PROCEDURE
    1. LONGITUDINAL
      1. PRIVATELY COMISSIONMED
      2. BIRTH TO START SCHOOL
    2. 1200 CHILDREN
      1. DATA COLLECTED
        OBSERVATIONS
        INTERVIEWS
        SURVEYS
  3. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
    1. LENGTH OF TIME IN DAYCARE
      1. EARLY CONTINUOUS INTENSIVE TIME
        BEHAVIOURAL PROBLEMS
        AGGRESSION OR DISOBEDIENCE
        RATED BY PARENTS AND TEACHERS
    2. TYPE OF DAYCARE
      1. NURSERY BETTER THAN HOMESTAY
        COGNITIVE AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT
        MORE AGGRESSION AND DISOBEDIENCE
    3. QUALITY OF DAYCARE
      1. LOW QUALITY
        BAD FOR CHILDREN
        ESPECIALLY IF MOTHERS LACKED SENSITIVITY
      2. GOOD QUALITY
        RESPONSIVE STAFF
        STIMULATING ENVIORONMENT
        GOOD FOR THINKING AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT
  4. EVALUATION
    1. STRENGTHS
      1. LARGE SAMPLE
      2. LOTS OF VARIABLES CONSIDERED
      3. RESULTS MORE SECURE
      4. VARIED WAYS TO COLLECT DATA
        CAN BE COMPARED
        CHECK FOR RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    2. WEAKNESSES
      1. COMPLEX ISSUE TO STUDY
        MANY OTHER VARIABLES
        I.E. PERSONALITY, ATTACHMENT, FAMILY LIFE
      2. HARD TO GENERALISE
        CULTURALLY SPECIFIC
ADVANTAGE
1. EPPE (UK)
  1. AIM
    1. (1997-2003) GOVERNMENT FUNDED
      1. FROM 3-11 YRS LONGITUDINAL
    2. LEARN ABOUT THEIR DEVELOPMENT
      1. INTELLECTUAL / SOCIAL
        INEQUALITY BE REDUCED?
  2. PROCEDURE
    1. 3000 CHILDREN
      1. MANY DIFFERENT BACKGROUNDS
      2. TWO GROUPS
        HOMESTAY (CONTROL)
        DAYCARE
        144 CENTRES TOOK PART
    2. OSERVATIONS
    3. INTERVIEWS
      1. PARENTS
      2. PRACTITIONERS
  3. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
    1. HIGH QUALITY
      1. IMPROVED SOCIAL, INTELLECUTUAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DEVELOPMENT
        BETTER SOCIABILITY, INDEPENDENCE AND CONCENTRATION
    2. THE EARLIER THE BETTER
      1. INTELLECTUAL IMPROVEMENT
    3. FULL TIME NO BETTER THAN PART TIME
      1. DISADVANTAGE CHILDREN
        BETTER IN GOOD QUALITY
        WITH MIXTURE OF SOCIAL BACKGROUNDS
  4. EVALUATION
    1. STRENGTH
      1. CAREFULLY PLANNED
      2. CONTROL GROUP
      3. CONCLUSION DRAWN SECURELY
      4. LONGITUDINAL
    2. WEAKNESSES
      1. POSSIBLE GOVERNMENT AGENDA
        INFLUENCED CONCLUSIONS?
      2. UK CUTURAL ISSUES
      3. COMPLEX ISSUE

Próximo

Descrição

Resumo de Recurso

Semelhante

	Criado por mrthrills aproximadamente 10 anos atrás