Mapa mental
Pore Fluid Properties

Conteúdo do mapa
Pore Fluid Properties
Fluids & Saturation
- Rocks saturated with less compressible fluids show higher Vp & AI
- Hence, rocks with less compressible fluids have higher Vp/Vs ratios 4-D & AVO are dependent on both fluid & rock properties
- Fluid effect on rocks with stiff pores (hard rocks) are smaller than rocks with compliant pores (soft rocks)
- Vs & SI are much less affected by pore fluids because fluids have no rigidity
Porosity, Pore Shape & Clay content
- Rock velocity & impedance decrease with increasing porosity
- Pore shape has greater effect on seismic properties of rock. Pore shape varies in wide ranges and is hard to quantify
- Effect of clay content ion seisimic properties depends further on clay type & position of clay particles in rock . Main effect of clay is due to density effect
Pressure
- 2 distinct pressures exist in a reservoir
- Overburden pressure (Po)/ confining pressure : pressure exerted by the total overburden rock
- Reservoir pressure (Pr) / fluid pressure / pore pressure: pressure exerted by the fluid mass
- Net overburden pressure=Po-Pr. Seismic velocities and impedance increases non-linearly as net overburden pressure increases
- 2 distinct pressures exist in a reservoir
Temperature
- With increasing temperature, seismic velocities & impedance decreases slightly in gas/water-saturated rocks, but decrease significantly in consolidated sands with heavy oils
Lithology
- Vs trend: Sst > Dolomite > Lst > Unconsolidated sand
- Vp trend: Dolomite > Lst > Sst > unconsolidated sand
- Vp/Vs trend: Lst > Dolomite > Deeply buried unconsolidated sand > Sst
- Shales have wide ranges of velocities & impedances, but always have higher Vp/Vs ratios than reservoir sands
Density
- Empirical relationships relate increasing bulk density with increasing bulk density
- Gardner:
- Empirical relationships relate increasing bulk density with increasing bulk density
Vp versus Vs
- Deriving Vs from available Vp: Castagna empirical relation for water-saturated clastic silicate rocks
- Mudrock line: 1.36 + 1.16Vs (km/s)
- Gassmann equation
- Greenberg & Castagna : and interative model that combines Gassmann equation & Voigt-Reuss-Hill velocity average to estimate Vs in porous rocks. Required input parameters: lithology, saturation, porosity, Vs
- Deriving Vs from available Vp: Castagna empirical relation for water-saturated clastic silicate rocks
Vp/Vs ratio
- Lithology indicator
- Vp/Vs can different shales (high) from reservoir sand, and carbonates (limestone from dolomite)
- Direct hydrocarbon detection, especially with AVO techniques
- Because Vs insensitive to fluid changes while Vp is, resulting in Vp/Vs changes
- Lithology indicator
Anisotropy & Shale Properties
- 2 types of anisotropy
- Induced anisotropy
- Caused by stress anisotropy & fracturing. Stress anisotropy preferentially aign pores, grains crakcs & fractres
- Intrinsic anisotropy
- Caused by preferential alignment of elongate grains / pores & fine lamination
- Normally in the form of transverse isotropy (ex: shales)
- Induced anisotropy
- 2 types of anisotropy
Texture
- Seismic velocities & impedance will be lower when there is: good grain-to-grain contact, cementation, poorly sorted sand, good sorting, well-rounded grains
Imagens e arquivos do mapa
Informações
- Descrição
- Physics Mapa Mental sobre Pore Fluid Properties, criado por Yin Mui Tang em 21-07-2017.
- Criado por
- Yin Mui Tang
- Visualizações
- 0
- Histórico
-
- Criado por Yin Mui Tang · 21 jul 2017
- Copiado por Yin Mui Tang · 21 jul 2017
- Avaliação


