8090646
Questão 1
Questão
Damages are the only common law remedy for breach of contract
Responda
-
True
-
False
Questão 2
Questão
Robinson v Harman - 'the purpose of damages is to put the innocent party back in their original position'
Responda
-
True
-
False
Questão 3
Questão
What case is the leading authority for determining consequential loss?
Responda
-
Robinson v Harman
-
Hadley v Baxendale
-
The Heron II
Questão 4
Questão
In Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries, could the innocent party sue for the loss of the potential new contract?
Responda
-
Yes, exceptional loss if always recoverable
-
No, exceptional loss is not recoverable
Questão 5
Questão
Was the loss of profit in The Heron II considered a reasonably possible result of the breach?
Responda
-
Yes
-
No
Questão 6
Questão
Was the loss in Jackson v RBS too remote from the breach of the defendant?
Responda
-
Yes
-
No
Questão 7
Questão
Could the innocent party claim for the loss of the following fixture in The Achilleas?
Responda
-
Yes
-
No
Questão 8
Questão
Was the 'cost of cure' considered unreasonable by the court in Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth?
Responda
-
Yes
-
No
Questão 9
Questão
What is the general rule regarding damages for emotional distress?
Responda
-
They are recoverable
-
They are not recoverable
Questão 10
Questão
However, where MAY a party be awarded damages for emotional distress?
Responda
-
Where the terms of the contract specify you can sue for this reason
-
Where the central purpose of the contract is enjoyment or relaxation
-
Where children are involved
Quer criar seus próprios Quizzes gratuitos com a GoConqr? Saiba mais.