Quiz
Qualitative guidelines
Dieses Quiz enthält Fragetypen, die sich im gewohnten Player öffnen.
Fragen in diesem Quiz (16)
1According to Yardley (2000), commitment and rigour involves: (4)
- AImmersion in data
- BIn-depth engagement with topic
- CMethodological competence
- DThorough data collection
- EClarity and power of argument
- FFit between theory and method
2Transparency and coherence involves: (4)
- AClarity and power of arguments
- BTransparent methods and data presentation
- CFit between theory and method
- DReflexivity
- EImmersion in data
- FSocio-cultural importance
3Impact and importance involves [blank_start]theoretical[blank_end] importance, involving enriching understanding, [blank_start]socio-cultural[blank_end] importance, meaning to change society, and [blank_start]practice[blank_end] importance, for example to inform policy
- Atheoretical
- Bsocio-cultural
- Cpractice
4According to Lincoln & Guba (1989), how can a researcher establish trustworthiness? (4)
- ACredibility
- BTransferability
- CDependability
- DConfirmability
- ETriangulation
- FMember checking
5According to Lincoln & Guba (1989), how can credibility be achieved: (6)
- APersistent engagement and observation
- BTriangulation
- CPeer debriefing
- DNegative case analysis
- EReferential adequacy
- FMember checking
- GTransferability
- HDependability
6Triangulation involves:
- AGetting more than 1 person to code data etc.
- BGetting peer reviewed
- CAcknowledging information that doesn't fit the theory
- DChecking data and analysis with participants
7Peer debriefing is basically the same as peer review
- ARichtig
- BFalsch
8Acknowledging information that doesn't fit with the theory is known as:
- ANegative case analysis
- BReferential adequacy
- CMember checking
- DTriangulation
9Go back to the raw data to compare to preliminary findings to ensure nothing was missed is known as:
- AReferential adequacy
- BNegative case analysis
- CMember checking
- DTransferability
10Member checking, a method of gaining credibility, involves:
- AChecking data and analysis with participants
- BGoing back to raw data to compare to preliminary findings to ensure nothing was missed
- CAcknowledging information that doesn't fit with the theory
- DPeer debriefing
11Providing thick descriptions so others can judge the applicability of findings to other contexts is known as:
- ATransferability
- BDependability
- CConfirmability
- DCredibility
12Dependability involves:
- AInquiry audit
- BAudit trail
- CPeer debriefing
- DReferential adequacy
13An inquiry audit involves getting a peer to check the data and report to ensure it is internally coherent
- ARichtig
- BFalsch
14An inquiry audit involves showing the process of research to ensure it fits together
- ARichtig
- BFalsch
15Confirmability involves:
- AAn audit trail
- BAn inquiry audit
- CDependability
- DTriangulation
16An audit trail involves showing the process of research to ensure it all fits together
- ARichtig
- BFalsch
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- RDA2 - Qualitative Quiz am Qualitative guidelines, erstellt von Róisín Farmer am 03/05/2017.
- Autor
- Róisín Farmer
- Sprache
- English
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Schlagwörter
- Bewertung
- Noch keine Bewertungen Bewerte dieses Quiz