Karteikarten
EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERS
Karten in diesem Stapel (15)
- 1EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERSRelationship – intersection instead of 1 group being completely subsumed by another group we have 2 groups that happen to share some share of overlap
Ex: Venn diagram – size of intersection between the relation of one idea and another idea (dogs & things that are cute) - 2EQ indicator: SOME"Some speaks of a range”
Definition of “some” is at least 1
Starts at 1 to 100 (does not include 0) Lower bound: 1
Upper bound: 100 - 3“MANY” = “SOME”On the LSAT, the word “many” just means “some”
- 4“MOST” STATEMENTSIntersection between two ideas
Definition for “Most” is half plus 1
Lower bound: 51
Upper bound: 100
Also speaks of a range - 5“FEW” STATEMENTSDefinition of “few” is some are, most are not
Ex: [Few] dogs (D) are evil (E)
1. Some dogs are evil – D some E (and)
2. Most dogs are not evil- D –most- > /E
On the LSAT "few" focuses on MOST ARE NOT - 6ADVANCED: ALL IMPLIES MOST IMPLIES SOMEAll → Most → Some
All → Some - 7The three EQ logical indicators are“some” which means at least 1 up to all; “most” which means half plus 1 up to all; and “few” which usually means some are and most are not.
- 8NEGATE SOME STATEMENTSSome – None
Ex: Some dogs are brave
D some B
Negate [No] dogs are brave
D→ /B
B→ /D
All- Some Not - 9NEGATE ALL STATEMENTSAll- Some… Not… (0-99)
Ex: All cats(C) are pretentious (P)
C→P
Negate: [Some] cats are not pretentious
C some /P - 10VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (4 OF 9)A some B→ C
_______________
A some C - 11VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (5 OF 9)A-most->B→C
____________________
A-most→C - 12VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (6 of 9)A→B
A→C
________
B some C - 13VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (7 of 9)A→B
A some C
___________
B some C - 14VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (8 of 9)A→B
A—most-->C
_____________
B some C - 15VAILD ARGUMENT FORM (9 of 9)A—most-->B
A—most-->C
________________
B some C
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Karteikarten am EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERS, erstellt von smmolina0 am 21/10/2014.
- Erstellt von
- smmolina0
- Aufrufe
- 59
- Bewertung