Karteikarten
<3
Karten in diesem Stapel (49)
- 1Byrne and Clore (1970)REWARD/NEED SATISFACTION MODEL
- 2ArgyleBasic human needs satisfied by relationships
- 3Aron et al (2005)MRI scans found dopamine-rich areas of brain, associated with rewards, activated when looking at loved ones.
- 4Cunningham (1988)Male participants watched either happy or sad film, more positive interactions with female after happy film --> Classical conditioning
- 5Hays (1985)In friendship, just as much value given to rewarding other person as self.
- 6Kerchoff and Davis (1962)FILTER MODEL
- 7Gruber-Baldini (1995)Longitudinal study over 21 years, those with same education level more likely to stay together.
Became more similar in attitudes over time --> Stages more fluid - 8Kerchoff and Davis (1962)Couples completed questionnaires over 18 months. Attitude similarity key up to 18 months, 18+ months ability to meet each others needs + psychological compatibility most important
- 9Sprecher (1998)Couples matched in attractiveness, social background and interests most likely to develop long-term.
- 10Rusbult and Zembrodt (1983)Couple questionnaires. At beginning of rlshp rewards/costs not considered. Later on profits bring satisfaction and are compared to costs, and alternatives considered.
- 11Mills and Clark (1980)Two types of rlshps -
Communal - Partners give out of concern for each other
Exchange - Keep mental record of costs and rewards
--> only applies to exchange type. - 12ChristiansonBehavioural martial therapy as successful as other forms of therapy
- 13Rusbult (1983)INVESTMENT MODEL
- 14Rusbult (1983)College couples. Found satisfaction and investment best predictors of commitment.
- 15Dindia and Baxter (1987)As couple together longer, needed fewer maintenance strategies --> temporal investment.
- 16Sprecher (1988)Questionnaires - Role of investment not relevant to commitment
- 17Le and AgnewGENDER BIAS - Women invest more in relationships and notice fewer alternatives.
- 18Pistole (1995)Those securely attached showed greater commitment than insecure attachments --> other variables
- 19Akert (1998)Role played in breakup biggest predictor of its influence --> Model should take into account role played
- 20Tashiro and Frazier (2003)Studied undergraduates. Reported grief and emotional distress, followed by personal growth --> supports grave-dressing and resurrection
- 21Kassin (1996)GENDER BIAS
Males and females stress different reasons for break up, females want to stay friends, men want clean break - 22Pelliroux and Buss (2008)EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH TO BREAK UP
- 23Pelliroux and Buss (2008)Women showed more extreme emotions after break up.
More men had cheated. - 24Gibbons (1995)Collectivist/Individualist differences - Viewed and carried out differently, deal with loss of mate differently
- 25BussHuge cross-cultural similarities between relationship preferences and views, based on evolutionary theories
- 26Buss and Schmitt (1993)Men have lower standards during short-term dating, then show decrease in attraction after sex
- 27Buss (1989)Cross-cultural study over 37 cultures.
Women desired partner with resources more then men. Men more emphasis on looks, rated youthfulness. - 28Clarke and Hatfield (1985)Approach strangers, asked on dates or to have sex. 0% of women said yes to sex, 75% of men did --> Short-term mating predictions
- 29Miller (2007)Lap dancers earn almost twice number of tips in more fertile periods
- 30Singh (1993)Women with waist-hip ratio of 0.7 most attractive.
- 31Buss (1992)Interviewed students, found Women more worried about emotional infidelity, Men sexual
- 32Buss (1989)In 62% of culture men value chastity more than females --> Cuckoldry still relevant concern
- 33Geher (2007)Interviewed male and female undergraduates. No difference in how ready they perceived themselves to be for parenting, but given scenarios men showed higher arousal --> Less innately prepared
- 34Anderson (1999)Measured resources given by Father and Step-fathers, found step-fathers don't discriminate between children and stepchildren.
- 35Belsky (1991)Childhood experiences eg. parents divorce make men less likely to invest
- 36Shaver (1988)Experience love in adulthood as 3 behaviours learnt in childhood - Caregiving, Sexuality, Attachment
- 37Hazan and Shaver (1987)Love Quiz - Correlation between attachment style in childhood and adult relationships.
- 38Levitt (1991)Some expectations for relationships come fro childhood experience, other factors involved eg. Personality
- 39Rutter (1999)Individuals had insecure relationships with parents, but secure in adulthood
- 40Bagwell et al (1996)Poor quality friendships --> Low self-esteem
High quality friendships --> High self-esteem
Self-esteem effects future relationships - 41Meier et al (2005)Type and quality of adolescent relationships linked to type and quality of adult relationships
- 42Madsen (2001)Heavy dating in adolescent predicted poorer quality adult relationships
- 43Epstein (2002)50% of spouses in arranged marriages report they've fallen in love with spouse
- 44Xiahoe and White (1990)Women in China in love marriages felt better about marriages than this in arranged.
- 45Levine (1995)Would marry someone with all good qualities for marriage but didn't love
USA = 14%
Thailand = 34% - 46Van Izendoorn and KroonenbergHigher levels of insecure-resistant in collectivist countries Japan and Israel --> Impact behaviour in future relationships
- 47Jankowiak and Fischer (1992)Evidence of romantic love in 90% of tribal societies studied
- 48Seepersad (2008)US students reported signing ^ levels of loneliness when not in relationship than Korean students
- 49Johnson and Holmes (2009)Those who liked romantic films more likely to have views reflecting themes
e.g. love at first sight.
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Karteikarten am <3, erstellt von Eva Hammond am 22/02/2015.
- Erstellt von
- Eva Hammond
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung