GoConqr hat ein neues Design! Sag uns, wie es dir gefällt.

Karteikarten

personality mcq

gatalina9511 Englisch 162 Karten

Karten in diesem Stapel (162)

  1. 1What is personality Ashton 2013--Typical tendency to behave, think or feel
    for a long period of time, shows a stable
    pattern across relevant situations
  2. 2Nomothetci approach :Every one is similar to some and different to some others
    The in-between
  3. 3IdeographicEvery person is different
    Uniqueness
  4. 4Methodology of idiographicQualitative
    case studies or interviews
    :) in depth understanding
    :( it is difficult to generalise, make laws
    :( how can you test if correct ?
  5. 5NomotheticQualitative
    questionnaires/direct observations
    General law
    :( very superficial knowledge of the individual
  6. 6MeasurementNo meaningful Zero level
    No absolute amount of a variable
    No use of rations
    only uses ranking
  7. 7For good research the differences should be :- Equal differences between the scores
    -Equal differences in trait level
  8. 8Reliability -Does it represent the true level of Dv consistency of result by measure
    : internal consistency
    : Inter-rater
    :Test retest
  9. 9Internal consistecyAre the items correlated to each other
  10. 10Test-retestConsistency across different measurements of occasions
  11. 11ValidityDoes the test measure what it intends to measure ?
    -Content validity
    Construct -Convergent /discriminant
    -Criterion validity
  12. 12Content validityDOES THE MEASURE ASSES All THE RELEVANT FEATURES OF CONSTRUCT
  13. 13Construct validityAssesses the same construct to see if it correlate with other variables
    -convergent
    Divergent
  14. 14SELF REPORTS:-STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRES
    -EACH TRAIT IS ASSESSED
    -ITEMS ALSO INCLUDE OPPOSITE TRAITS ARE INCLUDED
    :) Efficient low cost
    :( gaps in our self knowledge
    :( will people report all
  15. 15Observer reportsSome one else provides the information
    about the target person
    Some one who knows the target well
    :) objective
    :( However observations are done in a limited range of context
  16. 16Direct observations-Looking out for frequency and intensity of behaviour to indicate trait.
    -Can be done in natural or artificial settings
    :) Very informative
    :( very time consuming
  17. 17Bio dataLife outcome data , records of a person's life which is relevant to their personality
    - behavioural indications eg phone bills
    :( Not clear what information is accurate or relevant enough.
  18. 18Personality inverntories Emperical strategy-Large number of items,
    - obtaining ratings from large sample
    Obtain extra relevant information
    Select item showing the strongest relations with external variable
  19. 19Factor analytic strategyWrite a large number of items
    Obtain rating from a large sample
    obtain extra relevant information.
    Select items based on 'Factor analyses'
    Categorizing item in to factors based on correlations between items.
  20. 20The relational stategyWrite items specifically for the purpose of assessing each trait.
    Find out which item are the best one by asking others or by obtaining ratings from large samples, select item based on the scale reliability and content
  21. 21THE BIG FINEOcean
    Openness
    consciousness
    Extroversion
    Agreeableness
    Neuroticism
  22. 22OValues
    Aesthetic
    Fantasy
    Ideals
    Feeling
    Actions
  23. 23CCompetence
    Order
    Self discipline
    Achievement
    Dutifulness
    Deliberation
  24. 24EPositive emotions
    Assertiveness
    Gregariousness
    Activity
    Warmth
    excitement seeking
  25. 25ACompliance
    Altruism
    Tender-mindness
    Straight forwardness
    Modesty
    Trust
  26. 26NVulnerability
    Angry hostility
    Self consciousness
    Impulsiveness
    Depression
    Anxiety
  27. 27HexacoHonesty/Humility
    Emotionality
    Extroversion
    Agreeableness
    Conscientiousness
    Openness to experience (unlike ocean it = intellectual )
  28. 28HSincerity
    modesty
    Fairness
    Greed avoidance
  29. 29EFearfulness
    Anxiety
    Dependence
    Sentimentally
  30. 30XSocial self esteem
    ,Sociability,Boldness
    Liveliness
  31. 31AForgiveness
    Patience
    Flexibility
    Gentleness
  32. 32Cdiligence
    organisation
    Perfectionism
  33. 33OAesthetic
    Creativity
    Unconventionality
    inquisitiveness
  34. 34General personality factorGFP
    stability plasticity
    N+c+A Facets e+o
    Items
    Specific responses
  35. 35Dogs personalityIt is a cross specie comparative approach
    humans as benchmark Supports the existence of personality differences
    found
    :) internal consistency
    :) Predictive validity
    :)Consensus
  36. 36Stability=(r= 1 ) change perfect stability
    =(r= -0 )change not stability
  37. 37Roberts et al and stabilityALL 6 TRAITS SHOW SIGNIFICANT CHANGES PAST THE AGE OF 30
    -Most change happens during adulthood not adolescence 20-40.
    -Mean level changes reveal a more complicated pattern tan analysis of stability
  38. 38Five factor view on stability and chnage-We change because humans have have a species wide genetic predisposition to develop in certain directions
    -We are genetically determined to become more socially dominant , less open to experience
  39. 39Social investment hypothesisWe change because our social roles change , as well as our sense of purpose and direction
    E.g as a parent you must be more conscientiousness
  40. 40Stability of traits in ADULTS- a few weeks apart .60
    6 YEARS APART .70
    24 Years apart .65
    used observer reports
  41. 41Stability of traits in adolescence and young adulthoodclarify
  42. 42Nursery school and political orientation Block and BlockAS KIDS LIBERAL ADULTS WERE: self reliant,energetic,domination
    AS KIDS CONSERVATIVE ADULTS WERE:
    Easily victimised,Easily offended over controlled, Fearful .
  43. 43Roberts el al:Conscientiousness, Emotional stability and assertive aspects of of extroversion increased during adolescence.
    Agreeableness : smaller increases, slightly increases during 50's
    Social aspects of extroversion = slight decrease during young adulthood (20's) and during (60's)
    Openness to experience Moderate increase up to 20 remain stable and during 60's declines a lot
  44. 44Stability during Adulthood Fair stability Costa and Macrae 1992During 6 weeks . 80
    During 6 years .70
    - use of self reports
    70 years apart too
    The stability did not depend too much on which traits
    :) used observer reports
  45. 45How is our stability during longer ? Costa and Macrae (1992)12 years apart . 70
    44 years apart .65
    50 years .60 -.80 (estimation )
  46. 46how is our stability during adolescenceStudied 270 self reports, college-graduation .60 across 4 years
    small change during adolescence before entering stability
    7 years apart = .55
    30 years apart =.35
  47. 47stability and change during childhood :( diffiicuilties:( they only start describing themselves in terms of personality traits around the age of 10
    :( The measures usually require a level of comprehension and reading
    ;( Difficult to compare skills and behaviours because ids get those abilities at different ages
  48. 48lamb et al Personality during childhoodlower in extroversion
    Higher in consciousness
    Higher in agreeableness
    due to educational system ??
    :( low reliability
    .50 stability
    but 13 years apart = .20
  49. 49Stability form childhood to adulthood Hampson and Goldberg (2006)800 kids obs reports
    self reports of personalities 40 years later
    Big 5
    0 above .25
    C .25
    E.25
    A close to 0
    N close to 0
    weak degree of stability
    :( Some inaccuracy in the assessment of personalities as teachers wont know all the aspects of personalities
  50. 50Huesmann (2009)Focused only only on aggression to test the stability of childhood personality.
    800 p'ps
    :) peer nomination as kids (Good as not all kids can do self report )
    moderate stability
    .50 male
    .40 female
    either: most aggressive at all point or not aggressive at al
    less favourable life outcomes : eg arrested, divorce
    If only at one point at younger ages not life outcomes
    if developed later = very likely
  51. 51Instant gratificationMarshmallow test ( 4/5) years old
    Parents rated personality 11 years
    0.20's-0.40's correlation
    delayed gratification
    competent
    academically
    Verbal fluent
    Link to consciousness
    Mental ability and stability
  52. 52Four humours :(Blood-very cheerful-sanguine
    Black bile-depressive
    -yellow-angry-choleric
    -phlegm-calm
    :( no empirical evidence
  53. 53ivalanced ian pavlovweak anxious - melancholic
    strong unbalanced-irritable-choleric
    strong balanced slow-calm
    Strong balanced mobile-lively sanguine
  54. 54Dopamine is associted withNovelty seeking
    Facilitates the transmission of signals
  55. 55Cloninger=personality characteristics related to response to pleasure and excitement.
    High levels of dopamine
    Impulsiveness
    Extravagance
    Disorderliness
    Exploratory
  56. 56ParkinsonsUnder activated dopamine systems
    Extremely on active
    Lack of interest in new fun activities
    Unco-ordinated movements
  57. 57SerotoninHarm avoidance
    -Inhibits transition of signals of punishment
    -Neurons to send messages to things that feel harmful and unpleasant
  58. 58Norepinephrine *low levels =:Inhibits the transmission of signal of responding to stimuli that has been associated with reward.
    * High dependence
    -sentimentally
    -Warm communication
    -Dependence
  59. 59Reinforcement sensitivity theory (Gray's theory) begavioural activation-BEHAVIOURAL ACTIVATION
    -Go system = Encourage pursuit of rewards / pleasurable aspects.
    People's sensitivity differ
    - novelty seeking dimension
  60. 60Reinforcement sensitivity theory (Gray's theory) behavioural inhibitionBEHAVIOURAL INHIBITION
    Brain regions receiving signals which indicate that punishments are being experienced .
    stop system, Avoidance of punishment
    if strong= strong avoidance of punishment
    anxious avoid pain and danger .
    " Cloninger harm avoidance dimension"
  61. 61Fight or flightBrain regions, responsible for motivating extreme reactions In response to extremely threatening situations.
  62. 62Extroversion and biologyArausability of brains
    Preference for high levels stimulation.
    seek stimuli
    Ascending Reticular activation system (ARAS)
    It regulates how much stimulation is admitted to the brain from the nervous system from environment
  63. 63Neuroticismbased on Sensitivity to stress
    Associated with the limbic system
    People with limbic system that i overwhelmed by stressful stimuli are more emotionally unstable - neurotic
  64. 64PsychotismAggressive,cold, egocentric ,Tough minded
    MAO High levels of P are associated with level of testosterone.
    This is associated with inactivation of neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine.
    eg lemon juice test-introverts produce more saliva.
  65. 65ZUCKERMAN:Unlike Eyes,each personality dimension is influenced by complex interactions between brain structures,neurotransmitters or hormone.
  66. 66Eysencks'spsychotism
    Extraversion
    Neurotism (emotional stability )
  67. 67HormonesBiological Chemicals produced in glands or body parts and then transmitted to other body parts
    This affect neuron Activity
  68. 68Teststerone-10 times higher in men
    -Associated with violent crime
  69. 69CortisolHormones released by adrenal cortex
    Triggered by stress to prepare the body for action
    Suppression of immune system
  70. 70Cortisol and personalityLoney et al.
    having high levels of cortison leads to emotion insensitivity ( for women )
    High sensation seeking= lower cortisol
  71. 71Oxitocis-Produced by the hypothalamus and released by the pituitary gland
    -In Women Oxytocin is released when giving birth, brestfeeding and experiencing orgasm
    -Men have it to facilitate attachment
  72. 72Genetics AdditiveEach gene cotributes separately
  73. 73Genetics Non additive-Multiplicative= the influence of the gene depends on the presence of another gene
    -Affects both MZ in the same ways as they have the same combination of genes
    MZ more than twice similar as fraternal when non additive genetic influences are invoked
  74. 74Genetic and peronalities (German studies)Self report : IDENTICAL .54
    FRATERNAL. 27
    Observer report : .45
    .20.
    combining both .65
  75. 75Minesota twin study-45 sets of MZ reared apart
    and 26 et DZ reared apart
    AVG TWIN CORRELATIOIN
    (. 54)
  76. 76Ipactof shared environment during adulthood :dIMISHES DURING ADULTHOOD
    FRATERNAL =.60 -.30
    IDENTICAL .70-.60
  77. 77Political attitudes and genetics- 700 twin pairs
    after 20 years
    conservatism
    Shared environment has a strong influence during adolescence but weakens after the age of 20 . as genetic influences strengthens
  78. 78Drinking and smoking (Li et al )Heritability of smoking initiation is .44
    Alcoholism .50 to .70
  79. 79Contrast effecteg 2 nevous kids but the parent rates on comparison between them
    "eg the loud one "
  80. 80Assimilation effectOverestimation of the similarity
  81. 81to overcome problems when studying twins eg assimilation/contrastObserver reports used rather than self reports , Fraternal twins were more than half a similar to each other
    Importance of common environment
  82. 82Assortative mating for personality- for example if the parents share a lot of genes then the fraternal will also share more
    -This would lead to the underestimation of of heritability
    :( no evidence to show this occurrence
  83. 83Assumption of twins Based on herritability studies1) twins share same features of the environment
    Adopting households may differ from normal households
    3) Identical twins raised together may be treated as more similar than fraternal twins
  84. 84Are twin households really different ?-Higher socio economical educational levels
    Parenting style more gentle and attentive
    Limited variation
    (Mc gue)
    Lower levels of alcohol abuse
  85. 85Selective placementBiological parent maybe similar to the adoptive parent therefore there might be an underestimated influence of the environment
  86. 86Birth order Alfren Adlerfirst born insecure
    last born spoiled
    middle child less insecure-less spoiled
  87. 87ulloway and Birth orderLater born sibling :
    high agreeableness
    Lower conscientiousness
    Higher openness to experience
    :( contrast effect
    with self= observer reports no difference in openness is found
  88. 88Genotype-environment correlation PASSIVEENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIENCE IS INFLUENCED BY PARENTS GENETIC PREDISPOSITIONS WHICH ARE ALSO INHERITED BY THOSE CHILDREN
  89. 89ACTIVE GENOTYPEChildren select their environment as a function of own genetic tendencies
  90. 90Reactive Gene EVOCATIVECHILDREN EXPERIENCE DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS DEPENDING ON OTHER PEOPLES REACTIONN TO THE CHILDS GENETIC TENDENCIES
    eg..PROVIDED WITH MORE PORTS OPPORTUNITIES.
  91. 91Caspi et al 2003Conducted a longitudinal study, tested stressful experiences
    5-HTT gene was found to moderate the influence of stressful life events on depression
    particiipants with two copies of short allele exhibited more depressive symptoms
    than those with homozygous for long allele
    :) evidence for gene by environment interaction as individual's response to the environment is moderated by genetic make up
  92. 92Interactions found by caspiStressful life events clearly predicted depression symptoms but only amongst those individuals carrying an s allele
    same with suicidal ideation
  93. 93Mental abilitiesDifference amongst people in their maximum performance in producing correct answers to problems and questions
    - Intelligence
    not due to physical or sensory abilities
  94. 94Francis Galton 1822First to study individual differences
    determined by g factors
    used a statistical approach
    :( measured physical and sensory abilities
  95. 95Cattel10 basic psychological functions - eg tactile,
    He developed mental tests
    :( measured differences in performance but no abilities
  96. 96Alfred binettDeveloped a variety of tasks to measure mental abilities to identify children in to lower mental abilities
    pragmatic approach
    :( did not investigate the nature of this mental abilities
  97. 97Spearman G factorConducted factor analysis
    a common variance was found
    showed that various school grades in various areas were positively correlated
    "Indifference of the indicator"
    High loaded g tasks demanded reasoning processes
    :( grades
  98. 98Thurtones primary factorsg factors do not explain the relations amongst various kinds of mental abilities
    verbal
    numerical
    memory
    reasoning
    perceptual
    spatial
    verbal comprehension
  99. 99Carroll 3 stratumover 70 narrow mental abiilities
    g= IQ SCORE
    m=100,SD=15
  100. 100vHANHES IN MEAN STABILITYY OF INTELLIGENCERAPID INCREASE DURING ADULTHOOD
    CONTINUE TO INCREASE DURING ADOLESCENCE
    DECREASES WITH OLD AGE
    :Verbal abilities are higher in 40s and 60s
    :( Cohort effect
    :( Lack of longitudinal research
  101. 101Reaction time and intelligencecorelation of - 30 on simple reaction time tasks
    indication that speed of brain and nerous system is related to G
  102. 102Brain wavesEPR Higher IQ score is related to greater overall complexity of the waves
  103. 103Glucouseuse PET , Higher scorres relate to less glucose consumption during IQ task
    need less if u r smart!!!
  104. 104intelligence and geneticschildren's heritability becomes les important with age
    gene=more influential during adulthood
  105. 105Womb environmentNutrients, toxins,hormones,born in the same placenta( Monochronic )
  106. 106NutritionBrestfeeding
    Higher IQs
    :( however the findings found nno difference between their brothers who were not breast fed
    very weak correlation
    :( issit because smart mums brest feed ?
    issit because of the actual mum baby interaction
  107. 107Birth orderSmall linkk
    better womb environment ?
    or issit due to social factors
    studiy found that when the 2 was traded as 1st no diff to real 1st
  108. 108Mental abilities and academic achievementIQ cores are strongly correlated with school grades .50-.60
    Underestimation between IQ and academic achievement
  109. 109Darie70,000 ENGLISH CHILDREN !!
    for subjects like drama = .47
    For subjects like maths 0.77
  110. 110Correlations between mental ability and occupationaal tastus.50 status
    .40 income
    (related to social class )
  111. 111Longevity and health Whalley and starrChildren with higher IQ tend to live longer People with low IQ were more likely to die from stomach cancer
    clear association between crime and IQ
    ? or because they got caught
    :) Moffit and silva those with who avoided police contact also low iq
  112. 112Fluis intelligencethe ability to learn new things not dependent on previous knowledge
    culture free elements
    flexibility response
    eg reasoning
  113. 113Cristalizeddo well iin things that require previous knowledge
    Depends on education and cuture
  114. 114Flynn effectPeople today score higher in intelligence tests
    1SD HIGHER 15 IQ POINTS
    specially for fluid inteligence
  115. 115Stenbergs triarchy of intelligenceAnalytic,creative,practical
  116. 116EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE Mayer and salovey 1993Managing regulations of emotions,
    negatively related to neurotic
    positively related to C AND Extroversion
    unrelated to IQ scores
  117. 117Personlaity andnd loofe outcomes (MARIAGE) Watson et al 2004291 recently married
    OWN agreeableness and emotional stability was related to marital satisfaction
    not related to similarities
  118. 118Personality and life outcome (Attachment)Anxious: tendency to worry about loss of patner
    Avoid ant Tendency to feel uncomfortable being close to partner
  119. 119are friends similar in personalityLee et al : H .28 .44
    O . 23 .35
    Not strong similarity or Exac
    Assumed greater than actual
  120. 120personality and peer relationshipSocial status = extroversion - positively related
    men- emotional stability
    tough ?
  121. 121Personality and substance abuse Ellkindat age 17 lowers in conscientiousness
    low stability in emotional stability
    Also predictive for developing substance disorders by 20 years old
    Also predictive quitting drinking.
  122. 122LongetivityLow conscientiousness 35% greater chance of dying before the age of 70.
    disease : Having ambitious disposition increases the risk of heart disease
    Type A increases hear disease : competitive
    hostile
    urgent
    impatient
  123. 123Academic performanceconscientiousness and grade = r.25
    elementary =.20 ex, agree,o and E
  124. 124Criminality and intelligence Gottfredson and Hirshi 1990Self control and theory of crime
    impulsivitty
    failure to inhibit selfish responses
  125. 125Romero Gomez=Delinquent behaviours was strongly correlated with impulsive risk taking
  126. 126Primary and secndary psychopathy1) Manipulaton,gradiosity
    2) Impulsivity, irresponsability,lack of planning, poor self control.
    Both correlated with delinquency
    Only moderate correlation between primary and secondary
  127. 127Dark triadHonesty : PNM
    extroversion: N
    Agreeblenes P,M
    Conscientiousness M
  128. 128Life satisfaction and stabilityheritability .40
    Self esteem .60
    cheerfulness .40
    Assertiveness .30
    Depresiveness -.50
    Anxiety -.30
  129. 129How are vocational interest studiedForced choice item
    *Levels of interest in one area relatively to other areas
    :( LONGER TIME TO COMPLETE SURVEY
    * Reports interest in various areas of work
    How much the respondents would enjoy diff types of activity
  130. 130RAISE MODELREALISTIC DERS
    CONVENTIONAL ORGANIZERS
    ARTISTCS
    INVESTIGATIVE
    ENTERPRISING
    SOCIAL
  131. 131VOCATIONAL INTEREST AND PERSONALITY* Extroversion : social and enterprising .41
    *Agreebleness social
    *Openness investigate.28
    Artistic .48
  132. 132vocational ad mental abilityrealistic :Mathematical
    reasoning
    investigate : Openness
    Creative thinking
    Conventional :
    conscientiousness
  133. 133JOB SATISFACTION AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITY.25 TO .35
    MODEST
    Highest correlations when using objective records.
  134. 134personality at work Barrick man and judge 2001Meta analysis
    c= was a valid predictor of performnce across various occupations
    EOA : NOT SIGNIFICAT FOR OVERALL PERFORMANCE
  135. 135INTERACTIONS IN WORK PLACEC increases performance but only when emotional stability is also high
    * also agreebleness
  136. 136Gender and agreeblenessdisagreeable less of an asset for women than for men
    men are see good if competitive
    not for women as it goes against gender norms
  137. 137selection manipulation and transformationSELECTION : people are selected in to work environments that fits well with personality
    MANIPULATION : ppl adjust to work environment
    TRANSFORMATION : change themselves to fit in
  138. 138Contextualizing personalityThis is important because personality may vary across social roles
    eg questions must be specifically referring to work
    This will increase the predictive validity
  139. 139Priblems with self ratingSelf Impression :
    when stakes are high people are tempted to present themselves in a more desirable way
    Self deception :
    Evaluating themselves as more positive
    better predictive validity with observer
  140. 140Integrity testingSelf report questionnaire , to see the probability of bad behaviour such as loafing stealing
    overt eg have u stolen
    vs personality based : more validity
  141. 141RELIGION Winki (2007)Personality in adolescence predicts religiosity
    High A
    High C
  142. 142Religious FudamentalismQuite extreme : negatively correlated to openness to experience
  143. 143SpiritualismEmphasis on experience and intense feeling
  144. 144Parents and religionWeaker association for children who are more confident and emotional
  145. 145Amazing apostatesnon religious
    but has a religious upbringing
  146. 146Amazing bellieversReligious
    but non religious upbringing
  147. 147Stability19 % high increasing
    41% low decloning
    40% parabolic
    fairly stable
  148. 148Life satisfaction and religion (Carlson 2005 )Instinct religiousness and prayer fulfilment were increasingly associated with greater life satisfaction
    25% LESS LIKELY TO DIE DURING THE STUDY
  149. 149adorno F scale9
    No reverse keyed items
    no support for different factors
    only focuses on right wing authoritarianism
    no empirical evidence for some factors which derived from psychoanalytic perspectives
  150. 150Eysenck ( 1954)LEFT( TENDER ) / RIGHT ( TOUGH MINDED
    fACISCIST/ COMMUNIST ARE TOUGHMINDED
    :( not objective interpretation of tough minded
    the sample used was not of a extremist population
    Re analysis = communist score higher on anti religiousness and fascist on anti humanitarianism
  151. 151Roxeach and policsLeft - Equality
    Dogmatism - Dogmatism is a way of thinking that is stubborn and narrow-minded, often because of prejudice and bigotry.
    Comunism and nazism = dogmatic
    :( Only positive wording was used
    no emperical evidence for sub factors of dogmatism
    western nations
    lack of studies in regards to extrimist
  152. 152RwaRight wing Authoritarianism
    Conventional : sticking to social conventions by in group authorities
    Authoritarian : obedience to established authorities
    Authoritarian aggression : support for aggressiveness towards norm violators
  153. 153SDOSupport for hierarchy
    opposite= egalitarianism
    Related to prejudice towards a wide range of social groups
    Opposition to progressive policies
    support for military spending
    Don not necessarily value tradition only if it preserves societal structures
  154. 154Prejdice AND SDO AND rWAnot a great correlation between each other, however produce a great correlation with prejudice together.
  155. 155Dualprocess * dfferent contextual and personality traits predict RWA AND SDOfor Rwa- a threatening context and social conformity
    for SDO a ompetitive context and tough minded
  156. 156BIG 5 AND POLITICSSDO= Low honesty and low agreebleness
    RWA= low O and high C
    LIBERALS= High openness
    Conservatives= High Consciousness
  157. 157Ideologies and marriage similar?religion .75
    politics .63
  158. 158Sexualityhigh arousal= seductive erotic
    low arousal= abstinent
    low commitment=plygamus , loose
    High commitment=devoted faithful
    no diff for men and women arousal
    but for commitment 60% women 40% men
  159. 159Sexuality and personalityArousal r=.45 extreaversion
    Commitment r=.50 agrebleness and conscientiousness
  160. 160Socio sexual orientationRestricted = comfortable in sexual relationships if there is an emotional bond
    Unrestricted = even in the absence of emotional commitment
    negatively correlated with honesty,emotionality agreeableness and conscientiousness
  161. 161Sexual orientation and personalitymen : women
    hetero= 92 92
    bi 4 7
    homo=4 1
  162. 162Lippa (2005) sexuality and personalityGay men and lesbians score higher on Openness to Experience
    Artistic vocational interests – creativity and unconventionality
    Lewis and Seaman (2004): 2000 respondents
    Professional artists: 5.2% gay men versus 1.1% heterosexual men
    2.2% lesbians versus 1.4% heterosexual women

Informationen

Beschreibung
Karteikarten am personality mcq , erstellt von gatalina9511 am 25/04/2015.
Erstellt von
gatalina9511
Aufrufe
8
Bewertung

Feedback

Worum geht es?

Wie gefällt dir das neue Design?

Dein Eindruck