Karteikarten
Psychology - Attachment
Karten in diesem Stapel (33)
- 1Ainsworth defintion'affectionate tie' 'endures over time' 'attachment behaviours' 'gain and maintain closeness'
- 2Donard and Miller (1956)LEARNING THEORY
- 3WatsonLittle Albert - evidence of classical conditioning. Conditioned to fear rats using load noises
- 4Harlow and Harlow'Nature of love' - 8 infant monkeys didn't form attachment to wire feeder mother
- 5Schaffer and Emerson (1964)Glasgow babies - Logitudinal of 60 infants. Attachment formed to most responsive adult who gave time and comfort
- 6Bowlby (1969)EVOLUTIONARY THEORY
Adaptive - social releasers - critical period - monotropy - internal working model - continuity hypothesis - 7Lorenz (1952)Imprinting of goslings = attachment present in many species - adaptive
- 8Hazan and Shaver (1987)The love quiz - stable early relationships = stable romantic relationships. Continuity hypothesis
- 9Tronick et al (1992)Attachements in tribe - babies fed by many women but still attached to mother. Against learning theory
- 10Schaffer and Emerson (1964)Glasgow babies - 1/3 children had more than 1 main attachment. Against monotropy.
- 11Kulochova (1976)Case study of Czech twins - abused and isolated until 7, then formed attachments to foster family. Against critical period.
- 12Kagen (1984)TEMPERAMENT HYPOTHESIS
Continuity caused by innate temperament of child, easier/harder to form attachments - 13Ainsworth and Bell (1970)THE STRANGE SITUATION
- 14Waters90% of infants in same group after 18 months
- 15MainAt 6 years old - all secure attachments and 75% of avoidant in same group
- 16AinsworthNatural study of Ugandan mothers - More sensitive mothers had children with secure characteristics
- 17Van Izendoorn and KroonenbergMeta-analysis of 32 studies - Secure attachment most - 1.5 greater variation between cultures - collectivist culture influence
- 18Takahashi (1990)Strange situation in Japan - no avoidant many insecure, example of imposed etic
- 19Turnball (1973)Study of IK tribe, no evidence of attachments, live in starvation
- 20Bowlby (1944)44 thieves - 44 thieves, 14 affectionless psychopathy, 12 separated. Other group only 5 separated
- 21Robertson and RobertsonPDD model
John and Jane - 22Genie (1970)Isolated until 14 - displays severe side effects of privation
- 23Goldfarb (1947)Orphans few a few months or until 3 years. Those until 3 years less social, more aggressive and worse on IQ tests
- 24Hodges and Tizard (1989)Longitudinal study until 16 - group of orphans to control group, had the same attachments but problems with friends
- 25Skodak and Skeels (1949)transferred 13 mentally retarded children from orphanage to mental home - IQ up by 28 with care
- 26Shea (1981)Videotaped 3-4 years old in 1st weeks of nursery. Children became more sociable and less aggressive
- 27Clarke-Stewart (1994)150 children 1st time at school. Those who went to nursery more social
- 28EPPE project (2003)3000 children, those who'd been in daycare played more independently and more sociable
- 29Baker et al (2005)Introduction of childcare to Quebac. After introduction aggression in 2-4 year olds increased by 24%
- 30EPPE project (1991)3000 children, chance of antisocial behaviour if 20 hours a week in nursery, large increase if 40 hours a week
- 31Dilalla (1988)Negative correlation between time spent in daycare and pro-social behaviour
- 32PennebakerDaycare has negative effects on children who are shy and unsociable
- 33Egeland and HiesterDaycare has positive effects for insecurely attached children and negative for securely attached
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Karteikarten am Psychology - Attachment, erstellt von Eva Hammond am 18/02/2014.
- Erstellt von
- Eva Hammond
- Aufrufe
- 46
- Bewertung