Mindmap
Chapter 3: Cognition, Language, Creativity
Inhalt der Mindmap
Chapter 3: Cognition, Language, Creativity
COGNITION
- Cognition:
- Use of imagery
- Picturing sensory experience mentally
- Same properties as actual object/image
- Same brain areas activated
- Mental Rotation: Metzler: rotating images takes more time
- We label classes by common characteristics (objects, ppl, events) - Focus/ignore on revelant/irre features
- Mental Rotation: Metzler: rotating images takes more time
- Same brain areas activated
- Same properties as actual object/image
- Picturing sensory experience mentally
- Concept learning: (Process of thinking)
- Hull (1920) Created a stimulus-response association
- We associate paricular response (concept) to a *variety of stimuli = define concept
- Bruner 1956 Hypothesis + testing theory
- We guess what attributes are essential
- Problem: we take too long to think
- LANGUAGE:
- RULES/STRUCTURES OF Language: (MPPSS)
- #1.) Morephine: Smallest, meaningful unit in grammar (of language) e.g.: [Dog] vs. dog[s]
- #2.) Phonemes: Smallest unit of sound difference in meaning e.g.: rip vs. lip
- #3.) Pragmatics: Chracterics that figure out social meaning e.g.: Intonation
- #4.) Semantics: Meaning of words/sentences/ morephemes e.g.: I don't mind, "losing my mind" => word has 2 meanings.
- #5.) Syntax: Contruction of sentence through combination of words = phrases. e.g.: adjectives (before word)
- #4.) Semantics: Meaning of words/sentences/ morephemes e.g.: I don't mind, "losing my mind" => word has 2 meanings.
- #3.) Pragmatics: Chracterics that figure out social meaning e.g.: Intonation
- #2.) Phonemes: Smallest unit of sound difference in meaning e.g.: rip vs. lip
- #1.) Morephine: Smallest, meaningful unit in grammar (of language) e.g.: [Dog] vs. dog[s]
- Development: Process of people communicating
- 1st: Crying
- 2.nd: (2-3 Months) cooing, vowel sounds
- 3rd: (6 months) Babbling = phonemes
- 4th: (8 months) Sounds from native language
- 5th: (1 yr) Whole words
- 6th: (18-20 months) 2 word sentences
- 7th: (2 yr) 3++ sentences + telegraphic (removed necessary words)
- Overextension vs. Underextension: Use word for broad class *of objects/actions
- 6th: (18-20 months) 2 word sentences
- 5th: (1 yr) Whole words
- 4th: (8 months) Sounds from native language
- 3rd: (6 months) Babbling = phonemes
- 2.nd: (2-3 Months) cooing, vowel sounds
- 1st: Crying
- Grammar development: Child learned new grammar rules, after knows where to apply
- Ocerregulation errors: Children apply grammar rule where it doesn't apply e.g.: goes, comed,
- ANIMAL LANGUAGE:
- Animals can communicate with humans.
- -Washoe the chimpanzee taught sign language in 1967. -People said chimps just learned because of operant conditioning (rewards). But chimps used ASL by themselves.
- +
- -Bonobo "Kanzi" (1980) - Taught lexigrams (symbols) to talk by modelling mother.
- ***= LANGUAGE NOT UNIQUE TO HUMANS!***
- -Bonobo "Kanzi" (1980) - Taught lexigrams (symbols) to talk by modelling mother.
- +
- -Washoe the chimpanzee taught sign language in 1967. -People said chimps just learned because of operant conditioning (rewards). But chimps used ASL by themselves.
- Animals can communicate with humans.
- Theories of Language Develoment:
- 1.) Learning Theory: -Bandura's view: environment. -Language is reinforced (punishments) -shape incorrect. -Imitation/modelling
- problem: -Telegraphic speech -Parents reward for content, not grammar
- 2.) Nativist Position: -Chomsky -Born with "hard-wired language acquisition device "LAD" in brain.
- LAD: Has Universal grammar= innate in humans to learn princples in human languages
- True because kids make errors; e.g.: "I want my" or "my cookie"
- INTELLIGENCE TESTING:
- Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
- Kids: Mental age/chronological age x 100
- Adults: Deviation score (you vs others your age)
- Both: If IQ 100 = average.
- Distribution of IQ has normal bell curve (with the highest in the middle)
- Determining: 2% of scores over 130 - superior vs.
- 2% of scores below 70 = DEVELOPMENTAL DISABLITY
- Flynn Effect: IQ scores raising over time. -Every decade average rate raises 3%
- Determining: 2% of scores over 130 - superior vs.
- Distribution of IQ has normal bell curve (with the highest in the middle)
- Both: If IQ 100 = average.
- Adults: Deviation score (you vs others your age)
- Kids: Mental age/chronological age x 100
- -Stanford-Binet (1916) - Tested school children in France -Modern tests test 1 person at a time b/w 2-23
- MOTIVATION/EMOTION
- Motivation: Initiationa, diretion, internsity of behaviour to satify needs/ Desire & willingness to do something
- PROCRASTINATION: Lack of motivation; possible to change orientation
- OVERCOME:
- Concentrating on one task at a time
- Pioritize
- Divide tasks into smaller chunks
- Reward accomplishments
- Help from others
- Reward accomplishments
- Divide tasks into smaller chunks
- Pioritize
- Concentrating on one task at a time
- OVERCOME:
- Motivational Modes: #1.) Locomotion orientation: Action; less procrastination
- #2.) Assesment Orientation: Evaluation, more procrastination
- PROCRASTINATION: Lack of motivation; possible to change orientation
- Theories iof motivation:
- 1.) INSTINCT THEORY: We all motivated by innate,unlreaned tendencies.
- Instinct: Inherited patterns of responses to particular of stimuli
- *BUT our behviour too complex to be thought of as fixed.
- Instinct: Inherited patterns of responses to particular of stimuli
- 2.) Drive-Reduction Theory:
- Homeostasis: State of equilibrium.
- EATING:
- Primary Drives: Unlearned, biological needs (e.g.: thirst, hunger)
- Monitored by hypothalamus
- Controls food intake
- Stimulation of lateral hypothalamus = eating -Destroyed= stop eating for a while
- Ventromedial hypothalamus: Stimulation leads to stop eating.
- If destroyed= can't stop eating.
- Ventromedial hypothalamus: Stimulation leads to stop eating.
- Stimulation of lateral hypothalamus = eating -Destroyed= stop eating for a while
- Controls food intake
- Monitored by hypothalamus
- Factors determining feeding:
- 1.) Appeareance/taste/odor of good
- 2.) Learned preferences/aversion
- 3.) Psychological factors (fear, depression)
- 4.) Satiety: Full sensation/ hunger pangs
- 5.) Glucose levels
- 6.) Homone Cholecystokinin CCK
- 7.) Insulin/ glucagon
- 8.) Hormone: leptin
- 9.) Palatability: sweet/fat foods
- EMOTION
- Components of Emotion:
- 1.) Behavioural: Act/behaviour performed when experiencing something
- 2.) Physical: physciological: (internal) changes
- 3.) Cognitive: Perception of situation/event
- 2.) Physical: physciological: (internal) changes
- 1.) Behavioural: Act/behaviour performed when experiencing something
- Theories of Emotion:
- A.) Darwin: Emotions are survival value..
- B.) James Lange: Physiological arousal (physio component) = then feels emotion
- C.) Connon-Bard: Emotion and physio occur at the same time (e.g.: stimulus bear + emotion fear + physio = reaction behavioural
- D.) Schacter-Singer: Feel physio arousal then make cognitive assessment (e.g.: Suspension bridge scared men rated women higher.
- E.) Lazarus: All depends on cognitive appraisal (occurs first)
- CULTURE: -Displays rules *cultural ones* to dictate how & when to express emotions. Teens and boys no cry
- E.) Lazarus: All depends on cognitive appraisal (occurs first)
- D.) Schacter-Singer: Feel physio arousal then make cognitive assessment (e.g.: Suspension bridge scared men rated women higher.
- C.) Connon-Bard: Emotion and physio occur at the same time (e.g.: stimulus bear + emotion fear + physio = reaction behavioural
- B.) James Lange: Physiological arousal (physio component) = then feels emotion
- A.) Darwin: Emotions are survival value..
- Brain Centers for emotion:
- 1.) Preftronal cotrtex: anticipates consequences of action
- 2.) Amygdala: Fear, intense emotions, idenity emotions
- 3.) Hypothalamus: fight/flight response
- 2.) Amygdala: Fear, intense emotions, idenity emotions
- 1.) Preftronal cotrtex: anticipates consequences of action
- Experience Emotions:
- Facial Feedback Hypothesis: Muscle movements produce the corresponding emotion
- Lanzetta 1967: Group told not to show emotions had lower ratings of pain when hiding emotions
- Strack: 1988: Hold pen b/w teeth found cartoon funnier than lip group
- Forster, 2003: Preferred foods when nodding vs shooking head came on tv,;screen (moving)
- Strack: 1988: Hold pen b/w teeth found cartoon funnier than lip group
- Lanzetta 1967: Group told not to show emotions had lower ratings of pain when hiding emotions
- Facial Feedback Hypothesis: Muscle movements produce the corresponding emotion
- Emotion and rational thinking:
- Damasio: Amygdala greater influence on neocortex than vice versa.
- Neocortex: Rational thinking part
- Emotional response intrudes on thinking
- Which is good because it helps us make decisions; we need to feel the outcome
- If cortex-amygdala damaged: -Cognitive OK -No decisions made. -no emotional learning
- SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:
- How social conditions affect human beings
- Attributions: (How we link behaviour to a cause)
- 1.) Situational: Attribute behaviour to external cause (our behaviour)
- 2.) Dispositional: Attribute behvaiour to internal/personal trait
- ***WE TEND TO OVERESTIMATE DIS, UNDER SIT. ***
- Difference is because:
- a.) Where we focus our attention
- b.) Lack of info
- c.) Success and failure: -we take credit for positive outcomes -Deflect blame for bad "external causes"
- b.) Lack of info
- a.) Where we focus our attention
- Difference is because:
- ***WE TEND TO OVERESTIMATE DIS, UNDER SIT. ***
- 2.) Dispositional: Attribute behvaiour to internal/personal trait
- 1.) Situational: Attribute behaviour to external cause (our behaviour)
- Attributions: (How we link behaviour to a cause)
- How social conditions affect human beings
- SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:
- If cortex-amygdala damaged: -Cognitive OK -No decisions made. -no emotional learning
- Which is good because it helps us make decisions; we need to feel the outcome
- Emotional response intrudes on thinking
- Neocortex: Rational thinking part
- Damasio: Amygdala greater influence on neocortex than vice versa.
- Components of Emotion:
- EMOTION
- 9.) Palatability: sweet/fat foods
- 8.) Hormone: leptin
- 7.) Insulin/ glucagon
- 6.) Homone Cholecystokinin CCK
- 5.) Glucose levels
- 4.) Satiety: Full sensation/ hunger pangs
- 3.) Psychological factors (fear, depression)
- 2.) Learned preferences/aversion
- 1.) Appeareance/taste/odor of good
- Genes and Body weight:
- Genes but environment involved too
- Producing LEPTIN is inhereted
- UP leptin, UP Body fat
- Metabolic rate: How fast body burns
- Set point theory: Maintain homostasis
- Producing LEPTIN is inhereted
- Eating Disorders:
- #1.) Anorexia Nervosa: -Overweight perspectives -Even when underweight -Starve
- #2.) Bulimia: Binge-eat. -Compensate for it -Laxatives,exercise, vomiting
- -Psycho Therapy -Cognitive Behavioural therapy (CBT), -Meds: Antidepressants, antipsycholocs, mood stabilizers
- -Psychotherapy -Family-based approach
- #2.) Bulimia: Binge-eat. -Compensate for it -Laxatives,exercise, vomiting
- TREATMENT:
- #1.) Anorexia Nervosa: -Overweight perspectives -Even when underweight -Starve
- Genes but environment involved too
- Primary Drives: Unlearned, biological needs (e.g.: thirst, hunger)
- EATING:
- Homeostasis: State of equilibrium.
- 3.) Arousal Theory:
- State of emotional, intellectual,physical activity.
- Maintain optimal level of arousal,
- individual differences considered
- Maintain optimal level of arousal,
- State of emotional, intellectual,physical activity.
- 1.) INSTINCT THEORY: We all motivated by innate,unlreaned tendencies.
- Yerkes/Dodson Law: Performance best when arousal level is appropriate to task difficulty Performance increases with arousal, but only up to a point..
- Motivation: Initiationa, diretion, internsity of behaviour to satify needs/ Desire & willingness to do something
- MOTIVATION/EMOTION
- Good test: (VSR)
- #1.) Reliability: Consistency-get same score each time
- #2.) Validity: Measures what it's supposed to measure
- #3.) Standardization: Admistered the same for everyone
- #2.) Validity: Measures what it's supposed to measure
- Do IQ tests prove failure/success?
- Correlation = positive, but it declines with age.
- a.) Elementary school: 0.6-0.7
- b.) HS: O.6-0.5
- c.) Uni: 0.4-0.5
- d.) Graduate S: 0.3-0.4
- INTELLIGENCE ALONE DOESN'T ACCOUNT FOR ACADAEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
- d.) Graduate S: 0.3-0.4
- c.) Uni: 0.4-0.5
- b.) HS: O.6-0.5
- a.) Elementary school: 0.6-0.7
- CULTURE FAIR TESTING:
- Most tests written by white middle class.
- Studies show: Asian-American-Hispanic-Black for intelligence level
- Trying to develop culture-fair unbiased tests. Difference is narrowing
- Studies show: Asian-American-Hispanic-Black for intelligence level
- NATURE VS NURTURE: Genetics/Environment issue on Intelligence:
- 1.) Genetic view: Believe people are born with fixed amount of i
- 2.) Environmental view: Early intervention critical for I
- Things that ffect I thru environment:
- a.) Schooling
- Early intervention gives lot of effect, but then fades out
- Positive effects: do better in life; don't drop out
- b.) Familiy size/birth order:
- Smaller/earlier have higher IQ
- C.) Prenatal Fetal:
- Alchocol lowers IQ *Correlation
- C.) Prenatal Fetal:
- Smaller/earlier have higher IQ
- b.) Familiy size/birth order:
- Positive effects: do better in life; don't drop out
- Early intervention gives lot of effect, but then fades out
- a.) Schooling
- Things that ffect I thru environment:
- Monozygotic twins (raised together) have similiar IQ
- Dyzygotic less smiliar.
- Even monozygotic twins are raised apart, still same IQ
- Adoption: IQ similiar to biological parents
- -*BTW WE CAN RAISE IQ.
- -FLUNN EFFECT NOT LIKELY OF GENETICS
- -*BTW WE CAN RAISE IQ.
- Adoption: IQ similiar to biological parents
- Even monozygotic twins are raised apart, still same IQ
- Dyzygotic less smiliar.
- 2.) Environmental view: Early intervention critical for I
- CONCLUSION: INTELLIGENCE DETERMINED THROUGH HEREDITARY AND ENVIRONMENT 50%, 50%
- 1.) Genetic view: Believe people are born with fixed amount of i
- Most tests written by white middle class.
- Correlation = positive, but it declines with age.
- #1.) Reliability: Consistency-get same score each time
- Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
- 1.) Learning Theory: -Bandura's view: environment. -Language is reinforced (punishments) -shape incorrect. -Imitation/modelling
- RULES/STRUCTURES OF Language: (MPPSS)
- LANGUAGE:
- Problem: we take too long to think
- PROTOYPE APPROACH: Rosch (1973): Categorizing average/typical case. Not single exisiting members/individual things.
- Exemplar approach: Typical/specific member of category based on experience, actually exists.
- STUDIES: Ask people to lsit typical examples; name familair ones/ expierienced ones. So we generalize (protype) and then use specific examples (exempler)
- Exemplar approach: Typical/specific member of category based on experience, actually exists.
- We guess what attributes are essential
- MODERN TYPES:
- Hull (1920) Created a stimulus-response association
- Use of imagery
- Functional Fixedness:
- Cognitive bias: limited to using object the way it is traditionally used
- E.G.: Match stick. People didn't use candle box on wall. (candle, box, match)
- Cognitive bias: limited to using object the way it is traditionally used
- Creativity:
- Abilitiy to produce orginal/appropriate/valuable (OVA) ideas/ generating many ideas in short time.
- - Divergent thinking: Brainstorming- ideas generated randomly, unorganized. later reorganized + crititqued.
- Abilitiy to produce orginal/appropriate/valuable (OVA) ideas/ generating many ideas in short time.
- Cognition:
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Chapter 3: Cognition, Language, Creativity, erstellt von Geeta T am 09/11/2017.
- Erstellt von
- Geeta T
- Aufrufe
- 3
- Bewertung