Mindmap
Constitutions
Inhalt der Mindmap
Constitutions
Codified
- within a single document
- e.g USA, Germany, Ireland
- Clear + easy to understand
- provide people of the state something to identify with
- inflexible therefore strong- principles entrenched
- Usually have a 2 tier legal system
- lower tier- 'ordinary'
- upper tier -'constitutional'
- entrenched
- gives power to supreme court
- e.g. USA
Uncodified
- e.g Britain, New Zealand, Israel
- some parts are codified
- e.g. EU convention + Human rights
- not entrenched
- many sources
Entrenchment
- Prevents constitution from short term amendments
- France + Ireland need referendums to alter their constitution
- USA needs 2/3 of both houses of congress and 3/4 of state legislatures to agree
- Britain has no entrenchment, it can change the constitution through a simple act of parliament
- e.g 2011 fixed term parliaments act
- However many traditions are important so it would be very difficult to change
Judicial Review
- interpret real meaning of constitution
- with codified they have to refer to text of constitution itself
- e.g. USA supreme courts judgement on Brown V Board
- in UK this have to interpret against EU conventions on Human rights or statutes or conventions
- in UK Parliament can overrule judges decisions
- e.g. Belmarsh Case
- with codified they have to refer to text of constitution itself
- interpret real meaning of constitution
Arguments not to codify
- More flexible
- needs to evolve over time to adapt to changing circumstances
- e.g. right to bear arms- recent school shootings
- needs to evolve over time to adapt to changing circumstances
- more decisive government
- no gridlock like in USA between congress and presidency
- e.g. Clinton + Obama healthcare reforms blocked by Republican congress
- no gridlock like in USA between congress and presidency
- Conservative Pragmatism
- it works
- More flexible
Arguments to codify
- Human rights not entrenched
- Executive power is too strong
- government is merged with parliament and able to dominate it
- Clearer
- they might take more interest in politics
- however USA turnouts are lower e.g 41% compare to 65% in elections
- they might take more interest in politics
- not modern
- makes relations with the EU more difficult
Sources
- Parliamentary Statutes
- e.g freedom of information act 2000
- conventions
- e.g cabinet collective responsibility
- common law
- Tradition
- e.g queens speech
- Europe
- e.g european convention on human rights
- Principles
- e.g parliamentary sovereigty
- Parliamentary Statutes
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Politics (Mr Edmunds) Mindmap am Constitutions, erstellt von Katie Mortley am 17/04/2013.
- Erstellt von
- Katie Mortley
- Aufrufe
- 101
- Tags
- Bewertung