Cross-border collateral arrangements

Cross-border collateral arrangements

1. Can be used to optimize liquidity management

2. The mitigation of risks in this environment

3. Focuses essentially on central bank operations

4. The current environment: central banks, internationally active banks, markets and infrastructure

   • Internationally active banks may, under certain circumstances, face restrictions in remote markets or even in domestic markets
   • In particular, to the extent that guarantees are limited to high-quality domestic assets
   • These banks may find it costly to keep sufficient amounts of eligible collateral in all markets in which they operate directly and may face mismatches between the location of their liquidity needs and the collateral they hold.

5. Evolutionary factors, risk management and market microstructure:

   • Globalization has driven the increase in cross-border flows: The management of associated risks by participants has been hampered, inter alia, by the limitations of an existing market infrastructure designed primarily to meet the needs of national markets
   • Difficulties arise in the context of the banks' overall liquidity management efforts and the collateralisation of cross-border exposures and exposures arising in distant markets.
   • < Rapid technological innovation has led to greater complexity in financial products and has contributed to a greater emphasis on risk management

6. Compensation Factors:

   • The continued trend towards globalization and consolidation within the financial sector could contribute to a relaxation of the pressure on the collateral demand of some participants
   • The technological advances that facilitate the liquidation of RTGS and DVP and, therefore, leading to greater demands of liquidity to the direct participants in payment and securities settlement systems
   • These include the implementation of compensation algorithms in RTGS systems and the combination of bilateral or multilateral clearing with real-time settlement functionality.

7. Emergence is defined here as a situation that results in a large, extraordinary and unexpected liquidity shortage that may arise at the local, regional or global level.

8. Whether the cross-border use of collateral can deliver significant benefits depends to a large extent on the characteristics of internationally active banks and on the way they manage their collateral portfolios and their liquidity needs.

9. Central banks

   • Some central banks already accept cross-border guarantees and have adopted a wide range of approaches to accept such assets

10. Eligible collateral in the G10

    • Analysis of the size and use of the guarantee reserve of each central bank could provide some guidance on the existence of such restrictions
    • Might suggest that banks' requirements for assets eligible to support central bank credit are a major factor
    • Could have a marked effect on pricing, and raise concerns about accessibility / availability of additional assets

11. Market infrastructures

    • International markets are typified by borrowers that issue debt instruments in markets located outside their home country and/or their home currency
    • Domestic markets with foreign participation are mainly the G10 domestic financial markets and a few of the more advanced emerging markets
    • Market participants can settle foreign securities through a variety of settlement schemes:
      • Some market participants access a foreign settlement system through a correspondent.
      • Other market participants prefer to settle foreign securities through a link established by the local CSD in their home market
      • Yet another option is for market players to settle foreign securities directly either through remote access or by establishing a presence in the local market (eg a branch or subsidiary)

12. Internationally active banks

    • the degree to which liquidity and collateral management is centralised within the banking group
    • the extent to which a bank settles directly (ie acts as a self-clearer) in multiple payment systems.

13. Policy considerations

    • There was talk of various policy issues associated with border use of warranties whether allowed in a routine or on an emergency basis.
      • Help mitigate the overall systemic effect of the liquidity crisis. Relax collateral restrictions to increase market efficiency.
        • But it could: Involve additional risks and operating costs for central banks and market participants

14. Global systemic risks

    • Financial crises increase the costs of intermediation and restrict credit, which can impose severe costs on the real economy
    • Liquidity problems can be extended to other financial economies due to the connection of the international financial system
    • Helping to manage a liquidity disruption, helps prevent such an interruption from precipitating a global financial crisis.

15. Smooth functioning of payment and settlement systems

    • Securing intraday overdrafts abroad routinely could affect the pool of collateral that could be available to support domestic market operations or other operations of the national central bank.
    • By facilitating the desired forms of central bank lending, the routine cross-border guarantee arrangements could enhance the central bank's ability to influence trade in conditions in the interbank market, which plays an important role in the implementation of monetary policy

16. THE GOOD OPERATION OF PAYMENT AND LIQUIDATION SYSTEMS

    • The availability of liquidity in the payment system.
    • Lower risk of paralysis
    • Less delays in settlement.

17. Effect on competition

    • Commercial banks will be more competitive in the provision of correspondent banking services in distant markets, increasing efficiency in those markets
    • Currently only a few internationally active banks provide significant correspondence banking services in currencies other than their local currency.

18. Effects on the currency area

    • On the demand to maintain balances of certain currencies.
    • On the demand for public debt.
    • On the financial centers (most banks accept the payment system in these centers).

19. Effects on financial markets

    • The acceptance by the central bank of foreign guarantees for routine operations may increase the demand for certain securities
      • The acceptance by the central bank of foreign guarantees could affect the preference of a global bank to invest in guarantees with the lowest opportunity cost
        • In general, it seems that the acceptance of foreign guarantees would not have an obvious effect on the rates in the financial markets of the public debt of the large countries

20. Legal constraints

    • . The clarity and certainty of when the purpose is achieved should be guaranteed.
    • Legal risks increases the risk of potential loss of custody securities in the event the broker becomes insolvent, acts negligently, commits fraud or suffers an operational breakdown.

21. Other constraints for central banks

    • Costs associated with cross-border collateral agreements and regulatory implications.
    • Taxes and exchange controls.
    • Operational risk.

Bilder und Dateien der Mindmap