Mindmap
Construction Law

Mind map: Construction Law and Contract Issues
Inhalt der Mindmap
Construction Law
Class 10
- Design professional as judge
- Initial Decision Maker (IDM)
- Condition of construction contract
- Historical accident/ most efficient alternative
- New project position
- Arbiters
- Indépendant disputé resolution board
- Owner picks, contractor picks, members on board pick last
- Initial Decision
- Selection of IDM
- If you don't select someone judges are selected
- IDM Actions
- reject approve request info suggest compromise describing architects decision for claim
- Form of Decision
- Finality
- Unless
- Disagreement
- Mike m Johnson
- Unless
- Selection of IDM
- IDM Actions
- Renders Decisions
- Architect unless other selection
- Condition of construction contract
- Historical Responsibilities
- Determine contractors compliance
- Initial Arbiter of Disputes
- Owner v Contractor arch decides winner
- Designers know design
- Interpretation
- Finality of Decisions
- Initial Decision Maker (IDM)
- Construction dispute resolution
- Court System
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Mediation
- Favored by courts
- Non-binding
- Not for a decision, nobody wins
- Condition precedent to litigation
- Arbitration
- Binding
- Private form of litigation
- Under AIA Doc
- Rules
- Civil Procedure
- Evidence don't apply
- AAA Construction Arbitration
- Regular Track
- Fast Track
- Civil Procedure
- Issues
- Timeline of Demand
- Statute of repose, statute of limitations
- Arbitrator Jurisdiction
- Timeline of Demand
- Revised Uniform Arb Act.
- Industry group wrote statutes that uniformly ....like a court decision
- Court or Arbitration?
- Valid, Enforceable, and irrevocable
- Disputes
- Is the case arbitrable
- Pamco
- Any dispute between two is arbitrable
- Claim involves the owner
- Court
- Close call, will not decide merits
- Pamco
- Is the case arbitrable
- Selection
- Impartially
- RCW 7.04A.120
- Disclosures by arbitrator
- Joinder and Consolidation
- Contract
- AIA A201-2007:: §15.4.4
- Court order
- RCW 7.04A.100
- Consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings
- Three party dispute
- Risk of adverse decision is eliminated
- Most efficient
- Three party dispute
- Architect brings owner into arbitration
- Contract
- Hearing
- Subpoena Powers
- Legal rules of evidence
- Ex parte Communications
- Substantive Standards
- Remedies
- Money
- Damages
- Performance
- No judge, present evidence
- you get a decision
- Mutual agreement
- you get a decision
- better for cases that have lower stakes
- Through contract only
- Mediation
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- If contract says nothing
- Court System
- Surety Bond
- Terminology
- Surety
- protects owner
- Principle
- Obligee
- Surety
- Bond Types
- Bid
- Performance
- payment
- Subcontractor
- Public Works bond
- Registration
- Who can Sue
- Performance
- Payment
- WA public works bond
- WA Contractors bond
- Terminology
- Termination of Construction Contract
- Termination
- Drastic
- Risky
- Agreement of the parties
- by the contractor
- Notice requirement
- by the owner for convience
- Suspension
- Payment to contractor
- T for C
- Owner stops paying,
- Damages
- reasonable overhead and profit
- T for C
- Payment to contractor
- Termination
- owner does not want to continue with project
- Suspension
- By the owner for Cause/Default
- by the contractor
- Termination
- Contractors compliance with contract Docs.
- Architects less controversial role
- Interpret/decide concerning contractors performance
- Fairness
- Based on actually contract, decision
- Arch will not show favoritism
- Money may pose difficult enforcing
- Arch will not show favoritism
- Based on actually contract, decision
- Aesthetics
- Who Pays?
- Contractor
- when contrary to archs request
- Contrary to contract documents
- It depends
- Contractor covers work
- Architect requests it be uncovered
- Contractor covers work
- Contractor
- Architects less controversial role
- Design professional as judge
Class 9
- Construction Related Accidents
- Workers Compensation Laws
- Title 51 RCW
- Idustrial Insurance
- Sure and Certain relief for workers
- Employer Immunity
- may be asked to be waived
- Idustrial Insurance
- RETRO - WA's Retrospective Rating
- Optional
- Potential to reduce industrial insurance costs
- WA Department of Labor and Industries
- Limited benefits
- Title 51 RCW
- Responsibility for Safety
- General Contractor
- non-delegable duty for safety
- Control
- General Duty
- Specific Duty
- Primary Responsibiliy for safety
- non-delegable duty for safety
- Owner
- Subcontractor
- Hennig v Crosby Group
- Concurrent duty
- Statutory/Contractual
- RCW Title 51 Immunity
- Jones v. Halvorson-Berg
- Loaned Servant/ Control
- General Contractor
- Standard of Conduct
- Avoid unreasonable risk of harm
- Statutory Safety Laws
- Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
- WA Industrial Safety and Health Act of 1973
- OSHA Approved
- Most all contractors
- Workers Compensation Laws
- Indemnification
- Subcontracting
- Bidding Process
- Subcontractors Bid
- Snap Up Doctrine
- Bid Shopping/peddling
- Subcontractor Listing
- McCandish v WIll Const
- RCW 39.39.060
- A201 § 5.2.1
- Subcontractors Bid
- Rights and Duties
- Prime Contract incorporated by reference
- Conduit/ Flowdown cause
- General v Specific Purpose
- 15 Day Notice Requirement
- Prime Contract incorporated by reference
- Standard-from Subcontracts
- Contracts
- Risk allocation tools
- Price reflects allocation
- Risk allocation tools
- Std. Forms
- AIA A401-2007
- ConsensusDOCS 750
- AGC of WA's revised form
- Watch for Modification
- Modifications
- May have removal of rights
- May have created internal ambiguity
- Contracts
- Payment Claims
- Issues
- Unjust Enrichment, Double payment, Forfeiture
- Waiver of claims
- Lien Releases
- Acceptance of final Payment
- Prompt Payment from GC
- AIA A401
- 7 Days
- AIA A401
- Retention
- RCW 60.28.011 for Public Works
- Private Work
- Chapter 60.04 RCW
- Issues
- Mechanics Liens
- Private work
- Chapter 60.04 RCW
- Public Works
- Claim on Payment Bond
- Lien on Retention Fund
- Pre-lien Notice
- Private work
- Bidding Process
- Contribution and Indemnifaction
- Contribution
- Indemnity
- Types
- Tort
- Implied Contractual
- Types
- Contribution
- Construction Related Accidents
FINAL
- ECONOMIC LOSS
- INDEPENDANT DUTY
- NEGLIGENCE
- WARRANTY
- PUBLIC BIDDING
- SAFETY
- Difffereing Site Conditions
- Copyright
Class 8
- Defects
- Claims
- Owner vs Contractor
- Only construction defect, not design
- Except on Design build
- Only construction defect, not design
- Owner vs Contractor
- Responsibility follows control
- Owner has control over design
- Contractor has control over means and methods
- Risk Shifting
- Freedom of Contract
- Good Faith/Fair Dealing
- Duty Implied in every contract
- Duty to warn
- facilitating coordination, construction shall make notice of discoveries that
- Project Acceptance
- Waiver of claim for defects
- Payment by owner not acceptance
- Final payment does not waive claims for defective construction
- Responsibility
- Divided Responsibility
- Courts may apportion damages
- Divided Responsibility
- Third Party Claims
- Comparative fault
- Personal Injury or Property damage
- Contractors Commercial General Liability
- Requirements
- Coverage Denial
- Bad faith
- Does not cover defective work
- Covers damage to property caused by work
- Language
- Coverage determined by language
- Standard Language ends coverage after Final payment
- *completed operations coverage required by owner
- Claims
- Subsurface Problems
- DSC Claims
- Type 1
- Site conditions differ from those indicated contract
- Equitable adjustment
- Provided by owner
- Contract indicated conditions at site; Conditions indicated differed materially from actual conditions;
- Actual conditions were reasonably unforeseeable; Contractor prudently interpreted contract documents; Contractor reasonably relied on its interpretation; and Contractor incurred additional costs
- Type 2
- Equitable adjustment
- Contractor did not know about actual condition at site;
- Contractor could not reasonably have anticipated; and
- Actual condition varied from the norm.
- Conditions encountered at the site differ materially from those normally encountered
- Equitable adjustment
- Type 1
- Risk Allocation plans
- Owner bears risk of failure to accommodate soil conditions
- New Rule
- Owner bears risk of failure to accommodate soil conditions
- DSC Claims
- Time
- Claims
- Defects
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Construction Law, erstellt von Ruben De Leon am 31/05/2017.
- Erstellt von
- Ruben De Leon
- Aufrufe
- 1
- Bewertung