Mindmap
Locomotion 2: Cilial-based Locomotion in Marine Larvae
Inhalt der Mindmap
Locomotion 2: Cilial-based Locomotion in Marine Larvae
Neuronal control of Cilial Locomotion
- Braubach et al (2006) investigated the Neuronal control of the velum in Illyanassa obsoleta and its effect on swimming activity and cilial motion
- Velum is the structure that is used in the movement around the WC
- Velum has a very complex neuronal structure and is a very important trait to have so understandably has high energy nput in its creation
- Measured cilial beats using photodiodes,
- Found two main neurotransmitters that had an effect on cililal beat frequency
- Serotonin increased cilial beat (dose dependent)
- Dopamine decrease cilial beat frequency
- Found two main neurotransmitters that had an effect on cililal beat frequency
- Swimming activity mimicked that of the Seratonin and the Dopamine effects
- Neurotransmitters affect swimming behaviour
- When n antagonist was added into the water neurotransmitters stopped working
- Proves neurotransmitters work endogenously (inside the body)
- Velum is the structure that is used in the movement around the WC
- Conzelmann et al (2011) investigated neuropeptide control in Platynereis larvae
- Whether they inhibit or promote ciliary activity
- Position in the WC controlled by neurotransmitters
- this could be controlled by other factors e.g. pressures, chemicals.
- This proves direct sensory - motorary function
- Position in the WC controlled by neurotransmitters
- Whether they inhibit or promote ciliary activity
- Braubach et al (2006) investigated the Neuronal control of the velum in Illyanassa obsoleta and its effect on swimming activity and cilial motion
Effects of Temperature and Viscosity
- Podolsky & Emlet (1993) looked at the effects of temperature and viscosity on swimming speed in Sand dollar larvae
- Tethered larvae and measured theyre swimming speed in three temperatures
- 12 and 22 degree water and then 22 degree water with an increased viscosity to mimic that of 12 Degree water
- This then separated the effects of viscosity from the effects of temperature
- 12 and 22 degree water and then 22 degree water with an increased viscosity to mimic that of 12 Degree water
- The higher temperature treatment showed an increased swimming speed of 40%
- water movement was increased by 35%
- 40% swimming speed and 55% water movement was due to the change in viscosity
- This showed an interesting component to viscosity - have to look at all aspects
- Tethered larvae and measured theyre swimming speed in three temperatures
- Podolsky & Emlet (1993) looked at the effects of temperature and viscosity on swimming speed in Sand dollar larvae
Cilial-based Locomotion in Encapsulated larvae: The Embryo Stir Hypothesis
- Goldberg et al (2008), Kuang et al (2002) The Embryo Stir Bar Hypothesis
- movement within the snail egg capsule is to stir up oxygen within the egg capsule
- Nutrient uptake within the egg
- there is no diffusion gradient at the edge of the egg, movement leads to gradient being formed
- movement leads to equal distribution of deoxygenated solute
- Testing the ESBH
- Pulmonate Gastropods used to test ESBH
- there is a metabolic cost to rotating so the spp show decline in rotations with aeration
- When exposed to hypoxia, stirring increased to boost oxygen stirring
- Pulmonate Gastropods used to test ESBH
- movement within the snail egg capsule is to stir up oxygen within the egg capsule
- Gastropods neurones were destroyed to see how it affected the stir response
- Found that rotations did not increase during hypoxia events
- added mianserin (antagonist to serotonin)
- this suggested serotonin was used in ESBH
- added mianserin (antagonist to serotonin)
- Found that rotations did not increase during hypoxia events
- Goldberg et al (2008), Kuang et al (2002) The Embryo Stir Bar Hypothesis
Role of Locomotion in the Evolution of of non-feeding larval Echinoderms
- Hoegh-Guldberg & Emlet (1997) looked at energetics of development in Lecithotrophic and planktotrophic sea urchins
- Lecithotrophic are much larger at the start due to their maternal provisioning
- They also move through development much quicker than Planktotrophic
- Generally a greater investment in lecithotrophic eggs = 2% compared to 91% investment of developmental energy requirements
- Also looked at how energy is used within the organism
- Planktotrophic organisms tend to be metabolsing for greater lengths of time
- energy is needed to input into moving around and feeding
- Often as much as 50% of the energy budget with returns of 4-6% from feeding
- energy is needed to input into moving around and feeding
- Planktotrophic organisms tend to be metabolsing for greater lengths of time
- No Real difference energy-wise between the two life histories.
- Lecithotrophic are much larger at the start due to their maternal provisioning
- Hoegh-Guldberg & Emlet (1997) looked at energetics of development in Lecithotrophic and planktotrophic sea urchins
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- The development of Cilial-based locomotion in examples of Marine Larvae.
- Erstellt von
- Connor Joesbury
- Aufrufe
- 20
- Tags
- Bewertung