Mindmap
Fracture and Failure
Inhalt der Mindmap
Fracture and Failure
diff stress-strain curves
- stiff vs flexible: gradient of stress strain curve in elastic region
- ductile vs brittle: ductile has high deformation btw yield and fracture
- strong / resilient vs weak: stress applied before material breaks
Types of fractures
- A) Highly ductile with necking down to a point
- "cup and cone": see combinations of shear direction and production of voids that join up
- B)Medium level ductility with some necking
- C) Brittle: amount of yield before fracture is important. No necking
- Ductile VS Brittle
- Ductile usually leads to single fracture surface as initiation of one fracture reduces stresses elsewhere
- Ductile: energy used in propagating the crack and no in initiate more cracks
- Brittle: once initiated crack runs quickly and get multiple fracture surfaces
- A) Highly ductile with necking down to a point
FRACTURE
- To produce fracture need to produce 2 fracture surfaces, which requires energy
- energy balanced by the release in elastic energy stored in the material
- Griffith's theory: draw
- total energy required to make the crack surfaces (eq)
- Critical crack length (grow and propagate) eq
- stress needed to fracture a material containing cracks of length 2c or surface cracks of length c (eq)
- more accurate relationship
- stress intensity factor (K)
- 2 measures of a material's properties
- Toughness= critical strain energy release rate (Gc)
- Fracture toughness= critical stress intensity factor (Kc)
- For fracture K=Kc
- Directions
- Failure
- 1) Opening
- 2) Sliding
- 3) Tearing
- 2) Sliding
- 1) Opening
- Load (altering fracture surface)
- a) tension leads to dimples
- b)Shear> elongated dimples
- c) crack opening> elongated dimples
- Failure
- Evolution of ductlie fracture (draw)
- failure in composites
- causes
- Filler: no important
- Interface: common point of failure / can be reduced (chemically) coupling filler to matrix
- Matrix: when there is excess filler
- strong matrix relatively smooth fracture across fibres and resin
- weak matrix:interface matrix debonds from fibres which pull out
- Matrix: when there is excess filler
- Interface: common point of failure / can be reduced (chemically) coupling filler to matrix
- around particles
- get concentrations at the "poles" of the particles
- get debonding at the pole or failure in matrix just above the poles where stress is highest
- Filler: no important
- in fibre reinforced composites
- type of failure controlled by strength and modulus of elasticity of matrix
- failure depends on interaction of fibres and matrix
- short fibre
- stress at the end =0; middle is higher// can get above critical strength of the fibre and it fails
- failure types (draw)
- Fracture model
- we assume uniform stress in material
- fibres will break randomly and load is tranferred to the matrix
- when a fiber fracture lead to stress concentration and crack propagates across adjacent fibres
- causes
- To produce fracture need to produce 2 fracture surfaces, which requires energy
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Materials 1 Mindmap am Fracture and Failure, erstellt von Sofía Herrero am 11/11/2018.
- Erstellt von
- Sofía Herrero
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung