Mindmap
Performance Management

Inhalt der Mindmap
Performance Management
Process
PURPOSE
- Strategic purpose
- Means effective performance management helps the organization achieve its business objectives
- administrative purpose
- refers to the ways in which organizations use the system to provide information for day-to-day decisions about salary, benefi ts, and recognition programs.
- developmental purpose
- Serves as a basis for developing employees’ knowledge and skills
- Strategic purpose
CRITERIA
- Fit with strategy
- System should aim at achieving employee behavior and attitudes that support the organization’s strategy, goals, and culture.
- Validity—
- validity refers to whether the appraisal measures all the relevant aspects of performance and omits irrelevant aspects of performance.
- Reliability
- the consistency of the results that the performance measure will deliver.
- Acceptability
- Whether or not a measure is valid and reliable, it must meet the practical standard of being acceptable to the people who use it.
- Specifi c feedback
- A performance measure should specifi cally tell employees what is expected of them and how they can meet those expectations.
- Fit with strategy
METHODS
- Comparative
- •Rater compares one individuals performance with that of others. This method involves some form of ranking
- 3 techniques • Simple ranking • Forced distribution • Paired comparison
- •Rater compares one individuals performance with that of others. This method involves some form of ranking
- Attribute
- Rate employeees in terms of attributes (characteristics or traits) believed desireable.
- Techniques: • Graphic Rating Scale • Mixed standard scale
- Rate employeees in terms of attributes (characteristics or traits) believed desireable.
- Behavior
- •Rate employeees in terms of behaviours. Organisations begins by defining successful employee behaviours i.e. what employee behvaiours help the organisation achieve its goals?
- Techniques: • Critical incident method • A behaviourally anchored rating scale (BARS) • A behavioiral observation scale (BOS) • Organizational behaviour modification (OBM)
- •Rate employeees in terms of behaviours. Organisations begins by defining successful employee behaviours i.e. what employee behvaiours help the organisation achieve its goals?
- Results
- This approach focuses on managing the objective, measurable results of a job or work group i.e. sales, costs, productivity such as units produced per worker.
- Measurement of productivity • Management by objectives
- This approach focuses on managing the objective, measurable results of a job or work group i.e. sales, costs, productivity such as units produced per worker.
- Quality
- Assesses both individual performance and the system in which the individual works. Employees and customers work together to set standards, and the overall goal is customer satisfaction. Combines a focus on attributes and results.
- Total Quality Management
- Assesses both individual performance and the system in which the individual works. Employees and customers work together to set standards, and the overall goal is customer satisfaction. Combines a focus on attributes and results.
- Comparative
SOURCES
- Managers
- Peers
- Subordinates
- Self
- Customers
Rating Errors
- Rater bias: raters often let their opinion of one quality color their opinion of others
- • Halo error: when bias is in a favorable direction. This can mistakenly tell employees they don’t need to improve in any area .
- Horns error: when bias involves negative ratings. This can cause employees to feel frustrated and defensive
- Similar to me error:
- Rater gives a higher evaluation to people they consider similar to themselves. When similarity is based on characteristics such as race or sex, decisions may be discriminatory
- Contrast errors:
- Rater compares an individual, not against an objective standard, but against other employees.
- Distributional errors: rater tends to use only one part of a rating scale.
- Leniency: the reviewer rates everyone near the top • Strictness: the rater favors lower rankings • Central tendency: the rater puts everyone near the middle of the scale
- Rater bias: raters often let their opinion of one quality color their opinion of others
feedback
- Scheduling
- should be a regular, expected management activity. Annual feedback is not enough. Employees should receive feedback so often that they know what the manager will say during their annual performance review.
- Preparing
- Managers should be prepared for each formal feedback session. When giving performance feedback, do it in an appropriate meeting place Meet in a setting that is neutral and free of distractions
- Conducting
- -“Tell-and-Sell” – managers tell employees their ratings and then justify those ratings. “Tell-and-Listen” – managers tell employees their ratings and then let employees explain view. “Problem-Solving” – managers and employees work together to solve performance problems.
- Be aware of bias and rating error tendencies
- Scheduling
Bilder und Dateien der Mindmap
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Performance Management, erstellt von Laura Catalina Gonzalez Sierra am 01/03/2019.
- Erstellt von
- Laura Catalina Gonzalez Sierra · Mär 2019
- Aktualisiert
- 1 Mär 2019
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung