Mindmap
Pressure Groups
Inhalt der Mindmap
Pressure Groups
Functions of Pressure Groups
- Relevant political participation
- Provide relevant opportunity
- e.g 'tax payers alliance' organise online petitions
- Governing process involvement
- Play a key role in the governing process and stages of policy
- e.g National farmers union helped shape agricultural policy
- Help indivudual MP's
- Help promote private members legislation
- e.g Music industry groups got the live music act 2012
- Representing
- Representing specific society sections
- e.g Age UK represent the elderly's interests
- Educating
- Informing the public
- e.g friends of the earth publicise environmental issues
- Scrutinising
- Suggesting improvements
- e.g medical groups like RCN shape NHS reform
- Make government accountable
- Help government more responsible & accountable
- Opportunity
- 'Tension release'
- e.g the 'occupy' movement, opportuntiy for protest about finance
- Relevant political participation
The differences between party and pressure group
- Party
- Seeking to achieve power / government responsibilities
- Must accept responsibility for policy etc
- Have to adopt policy along with government responsibility
- Have to behave in a responsible way
- Pressure Group
- Not always after seeking power
- Will never have to account for their actions e.g Greenpeace can safely oppose potentially harmful causes
- Do not accept restrictions of potential government
- Often break the law
- Party
Types of Pressure Group
- Sectional / interest groups
- Represent a specific section of society
- Self interested
- e.g trade unions
- e.g tax payers alliance
- Cause, issue or promotional groups
- claim to be representing the whole of society
- Have one or a cluster of issues they wish to promote
- e.g Greenpeace
- e.g friends of the earth
- Dual - Function
- Can be both sectional and cause based
- e.g the countryside alliance campaigns for rural areas but also everyone
- e.g transport 2000
- Insiders
- Operate inside of teh political system through contacts with MP's etc
- Regularly consulted by government
- Outsiders
- No special links with government
- Influence by mobilising public opinion
- Sectional / interest groups
How democratic are Pressure Groups?
- Are..
- Representative
- Educate the public
- Political participation
- Supporting minority influence
- Aren't...
- Accountability
- Putting someone up for office
- Size & finances
- Are..
Methods of Pressure groups
- Mobilising Public Opinion
- If a party wishes to retain power it has to promote for it
- e.g2005 election to gain more elderly votes
- e.g 2010 lib dems concentrated on young voters with tuition fees policy
- Lobbying
- Behind closed doors
- Discussions constantly going on
- e.g the welfare reform legislation of 2011/12 was the subject of intense lobbying
- Parliamentary Methods
- Some peers of the HOL back pressure groups
- Some MP's paid to fight groups causes in HOC
- e.g Live music act 2012
- .g 2012 health & social care act
- Direct Action
- Groups seek to obtain maximum publicity
- Can involve stunts/ provocative behaviour
- Government are forced to respond
- e.g fathers4justice dressed as super heroes and climbed buildings
- Mobilising Public Opinion
Why are pressure groups growing in importance?
- Direct Action
- Can exert more pressure on the government
- Gain automatic attention from the government / they have to react
- Devolution
- Forced to move some operations
- Smaller issues mean smaller groups consulted more
- Extra party institutions
- Closer relationship with decision making
- think tanks, policy units, private advisors, wokring parties
- Human rights act
- Reinforces rights
- Passed 1998 came into practice 2000
- Access points
- easy to organise / participate in
- Range of bodies
- Mobilising opinion is easier
- Participation
- Campaign on sections
- Growing membership
- EU
- Accept pressure groups
- Lobby groups sent 4,400 lobbyists to parliament in 2010
- Digital Democracy
- Using things such as the unternet to gain support
- Can reinforce
- Social communities
- e-petitions can pressure issues to get debated
- Direct Action
Success of pressure groups?
- Size
- nfluence by weight of public opinion
- Translates into voting power
- e.g age UK 70/80% of population are pensioners
- Organisation
- May not actually make an impact
- e.g plane stupid & greenpeace have been successful
- Organisation is key
- Opposition Groups
- Group with no opponent more likely to succeed
- e.g farming industry is opposed by animal welfare groups
- Insider Status
- Groups with ongoing contact with the government do enjoy an advantage
- Celeb involvement
- e.g Hugh grant is well known for hacked off
- Depends on celebrity
- Naomi Campbell seen wearing fur when in PETA campaign
- Finance
- e.g tobacco ban in public places
- trade unions have money but still fuitle
- Philosophy
- e.g hacked off exerted pressure on labour
- e.g busniess groups have done well under the conservatives
- Beliefs closer to the government's = more succeeding
- Size
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Politics Mindmap am Pressure Groups, erstellt von sallybooth am 17/04/2013.
- Erstellt von
- sallybooth
- Aufrufe
- 109
- Tags
- Bewertung