Mindmap
Ch9: Judgment and Decision Making Based on High Effort
Inhalt der Mindmap
Ch9: Judgment and Decision Making Based on High Effort
judgment
- likelihood
- goodness/badness
- priming
- anchoring/ adjustment processes
- eg. starbucks in Japan
- country of origin
- imagery/ visualisation
- eg. online demonstration evoking vivid mental images of product use,
- encourages brand-based processing cos images are organised by brand > attribute
- biases
- confirmation
- eg. apple
- self-positivity
- eg. insurance marketers (social risk)
- negativity
- DO NOT engage when consm alr committed to a brand
- mood and bias
- prior brand evaluations
- eg. apple ipod as precedent
- confirmation
decision making
- cognitive
- compensatory
- non-compensatory
- affective
- pros
- emotions - more satisfaction
- gather thoughts and make judgments more quickly
- eg. fearful ppl tend to see more risk in new situations than angry ppl
- pros
- deciding criteria
- goals
- time
- high-level (abstract)/ low level (concrete) construals
- present/ future oriented
- framing
- initial anchor/ ref. pt.
- gains/losses
- prospect theory
- losses > gains, similar to endowment effect
- ownership increases value/loss of item
- marketer's perspv: full money back guarantee, free shipping
- losses > gains, similar to endowment effect
- prospect theory
- time period
- pay by day vs. year (series of small expense vs. large one-time expense)
- buying/selling
- gains/losses
- priming
- hedonic/ symbolic attributes
- eg. placing wine next to gourmet foods - nice meal vs. buy 1 bottle of wine only
- hedonic/ symbolic attributes
- initial anchor/ ref. pt.
- consideration set
- attraction effect (comparison w. inferior brands)
- goals
- prevention
- risk-averse, preserve status quo
- promotion-focused
- willing to try new things if they think changing will achieve GOALS/growth/devlpmt
- prevention
- cognitive
factors/ contextual effects
- emotions, feelings
- values, attitudes, motivations, ability, opportunities (MAO) to process info
compensatory model
- consideration set
- weight them in terms of how impt. the attributes are
- best overall score
- other attributes can compensate for -ve ones
- mental cost-benefit analysis
- evaluate good attributes
- weight them in terms of how impt. the attributes are
- brand
- multiattribute models
- theory of reasoned action (TORA) ch.5
- multiattribute models
- attribute
- additive difference model
- 2 brands at a time
- additive difference model
- consideration set
non compensatory model
- negative info - eliminate fr. consideration set
- less cognitive effort due to cutoff levels
- brand
- conjunctive model
- min. cutoff for each attribute that represent the absolute lowest value willing to accept
- disjunctive model
- acceptable levels
- conjunctive model
- attribute
- lexicographic model
- order attributes according to importance, comparing one attribute at a time
- elimination-by-aspects model
- similar to lexic. but w. acceptable cutoff
- lexicographic model
decision delay
- act quickly
- eg. coupons and discounts
- act slowly
- offer additional info. to increase chances that brand will be chosen
- act quickly
consumer characteristics
- expertise
- consumption vocab eg. wines - buttery, dry, smooth
- mood
- good mood - more willing to process info to make decision, high arousal - greater brand encoding and recall
- time pressure
- base decision on fewer attributes
- heavier weight on negative info, eliminate bad alternatives
- extreme aversion
- compromise effect
- brand gain share when it's an intermediate than compromise choice
- tendency to find moderately priced options more attractive than options that are either very ex
- compromise effect
- metacognitive experiences
- ease of recollection, process new info, influencing retrieval ease
- expertise
characteristics of the decision
- info. availability
- more info > more complex> but might have greater satisfaction
- useful? relevant?
- group context
- self-presentation, social desirability bias, uniformity of choice, conformity
- beer marketers - show group members enjoying only the advertised brand > reinforces strong social norms and encourages consumers to order that brand when drinking in a social setting
- info. availability
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Ch9: Judgment and Decision Making Based on High Effort, erstellt von Joline Lim am 22/03/2016.
- Erstellt von
- Joline Lim · Mär 2016
- Aktualisiert
- 23 Mär 2016
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung