Mindmap
Parliament
Inhalt der Mindmap
Parliament
Sovereignty
- Legally UK Parliament is sovereign
- Source of all political power, no body can exercise power unless parliament authoriese
- recall any power it had delegated to others
- e.g devolution or the EU
- it can make any laws it wishes
- its not bound by the actions of previous parliaments
- therefore cannot be bind its successors
- Parliaments political sovereignty has decreased
- power passed to the EU
- EU law is superior to British law, therefore Parliament may not pass any law that contravenes the EU
- however there are areas that the EU have no influence over at all
- e.g health, transport, tax, education
- some areas the EU has great influence
- e.g agriculture, fisheries, trade and employment rights
- in theory Parliament could withdraw but unlikely
- power of executive has grown
- PM in particular
- especially those with large majorities
- e.g Thatcher + Blair
- Use of referendums
- have taken one of parliaments role
- to make significant changes to constitution
- results are not binding but it would be politically unwise to ignore them
- have taken one of parliaments role
- Following 1998 Human Rights Act, parliament has accepted European Convention on Human Rights
- act could be repealed, but parliament treats ECHR as supreme
- would take extraordinary circumstances to abolish the Act or ignore ECHR
- Devolution
- powers have devolved to Scotland Wales and Northern Ireland
- could be reclaimed, but highly unlikely in practice
- apart from Northern Ireland due to security circumstances there
- power passed to the EU
- Legally UK Parliament is sovereign
Structure of Parliament
- Plenary Sessions
- whole house meets
- normally Commons is only full once a week at PMQs
- can also be full for controversial bills
- e.g tutition fees/ fox hunting
- often Gvt will expect backbenchers to vote
- doesn't mean they'll take part in relevant debate
- Legislative Committees
- small groups of MPs assigned to scrutinise
- intended to make Parliament more effective
- recommend amendments however members are whipped
- The government would have a majority on committees in the commons
- Committees of Whole House
- plenary session of either house, norm for HOL, rare for HOC
- only if bill is significant or important
- e.g Budget
- Party Whips apply
- Select Committees
- mirror government departments
- elected by all members of HOC
- governing party will have majority of members
- not whipped
- job to investigate workings/consider policies + proposed legislation
- Speakers
- oversee debates
- supposed to be neutral, therefore uncontroversial
- replaced Lord Chancellor because of lack of power separation
- Plenary Sessions
Functions
- Legitimisation
- provides consent for legislation
- no bill can become law without parliament consent
- Scrutiny
- Scrutinises legislation, both primary and secondary
- involve making amendments
- represents various interests in society
- Opposition
- government is forced to explain itself
- benefits accountability
- Acccountability
- ministers forced to explain and justify their policies
- can extend to opposition parties presenting alternative opinions
- only a PM can remove a minister
- expected to expose government mistakes
- Financial Control
- parliament needs to approve budget
- Representation
- MPs represent both party and manifesto
- Redress of Grievances
- carried out by MPs on behalf of constituents- investigate complaints against public bodies
- Private Members' Legislation
- only way parliament can propose its own legislation
- Deliberation
- rare instance of parliament dedicating time to a great issue of the day
- Reserve Powers
- powers to veto legislation and dismiss a government
- rarely used, potentially grant great power
- government often see a defeat coming and withdraw or changes a bill
- e.g Sunday Trading Bill/allowance of Gurka settling rights in 2009
- Delay
- usually used by the Lords
- this means lords are laregly free from whips, can delay legislation
- gives government time to reflect
- e.g 1991 War Crimes bill- defeated, 2005 hunting with dogs act- passed
- Legitimisation
House Of Lords
- Significance
- large majorities have become common
- remaining membership of Lords has become more professional i.e heriditary peers
- more legitimacy- removal of hereditary peers
- contains legal and human rights experts
- becoming more proactive
- Restrictions
- can only delay bills, not block them
- it has no power over finances
- Salisbury convention
- Amendments proposed by the lords must be approved by commons
- Significance
House Of Commons
- Strengths
- theoretical power
- can amend legislation
- MPs can call ministers to account
- every constituency is represented
- when small/no majority- commons have power over governments
- different interest groups can be represented by different individuals
- MPs have freedom to express their own views
- Weaknesses
- FTPT almost guarantees overall majority
- party loyalty amongst MPS is traditionally strong
- another reason for loyalty is the patronage of the PM
- Strengths
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Politics (Mr Edmunds) Mindmap am Parliament, erstellt von Katie Mortley am 18/04/2013.
- Erstellt von
- Katie Mortley · Apr 2013
- Aktualisiert
- 6 Apr 2018
- Aufrufe
- 151
- Tags
- Bewertung