Mindmap
The impact of money on US elections and political process
Inhalt der Mindmap
The impact of money on US elections and political process
Attempts at campaign finance reform show that this is a key issue
- 1974 Federal Election Campaign Act
- Established the FEC and limited the level of donations
- But undermined by Supreme Court - hard and soft money
- Established the FEC and limited the level of donations
- 2002 McCain-Feingold Act
- Tried to restrict the use of soft money but had a limited impact
- Banned foreign donations and made a stand by your ad provision
- Tried to restrict the use of soft money but had a limited impact
- 2010 FEC v Citizens United
- Limits on what corporations could spend unconstitutional
- Could allow big business and unions an important voice in the future
- Limits on what corporations could spend unconstitutional
- 1974 Federal Election Campaign Act
Obama
- Harnessed the power of the internet to design the first 21st century fund raising machine
- By the end of the election, 3 million people had donated over $760 million
- This meant he became the first candidate that could forgo federal funds
- This meant that campaign spending limits did not apply
- During the campaign he could pour resources into crucial swing states
- In North Carolina, Obama spent over 5 times the amount McCain did on TV ads
- During the campaign he could pour resources into crucial swing states
- This meant that campaign spending limits did not apply
- This was more than the combined amount from Bush-Kerry in 2004
- Obama raised over $700m in 2012 - Romney trailed behind with $474m
- Both candidates could decline federal funds showing the limitations of legislation
- Obama raised over $700m in 2012 - Romney trailed behind with $474m
- This meant he became the first candidate that could forgo federal funds
- By the end of the election, 3 million people had donated over $760 million
- Harnessed the power of the internet to design the first 21st century fund raising machine
Finance in 2016
- Clinton raised $620 million - Trump just over $330 million
- The ability of Clinton to raise money before the election scared off many challengers
- All figures show that Clinton outspent Trump in 2016 but lost
- Does this show that money was not important?
- Or was it because of the unique nature of Trump?
- His campaign got a great deal of free publicity due his actions
- He also had the support of websites such as Breitbart and the Fox news channel
- Does it also show the growing power of social media and the tendency of voters to focus on what they want to hear?
- He also had the support of websites such as Breitbart and the Fox news channel
- His campaign got a great deal of free publicity due his actions
- Or was it because of the unique nature of Trump?
- Does this show that money was not important?
- All figures show that Clinton outspent Trump in 2016 but lost
- The ability of Clinton to raise money before the election scared off many challengers
- Clinton raised $620 million - Trump just over $330 million
The length of campaigns
- Most candidates announce their campaign over a year before the election
- The invisible primary - all about name recognition and media profile
- Primary elections take place January-June of election year
- Candidates have to spend hundreds of millions to succeed in these
- Sanders spent $234m in his attempt to defeat Clinton
- Candidates have to spend hundreds of millions to succeed in these
- Primary elections take place January-June of election year
- The invisible primary - all about name recognition and media profile
- Most candidates announce their campaign over a year before the election
Synoptic Links
- The role of the media in US elections
- The importance of attack ads and negative campaigning
- This turns many away from the political process
- Low turnout figures
- This turns many away from the political process
- The importance of attack ads and negative campaigning
- The rise of the Super PACs
- Soft money - over $1 billion was spent in 2016
- Priorities USA Action spent $133m - they support Clinton
- Get our jobs back spent $50m supporting Trump
- Priorities USA Action spent $133m - they support Clinton
- Soft money - over $1 billion was spent in 2016
- The influence of Pressure Groups on the political process
- The influence of the NRA on Congress
- Since the 2012 election, the NRA has spent $3m a year lobbying Congress
- The influence of the NRA on Congress
- The role of the media in US elections
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- GCSE Politics Mindmap am The impact of money on US elections and political process, erstellt von Dan Bacon am 15/03/2017.
- Erstellt von
- Dan Bacon · Mär 2017
- Aktualisiert
- 13 Okt 2017
- Aufrufe
- 126
- Bewertung