Mindmap
Consumer's preference to public versus private label
Inhalt der Mindmap
Consumer's preference to public versus private label
Assumptions and theories
- Private label
- Used by distributors
- Lower product cost
- Rapidly increasing use
- "Modern" appearance
- Either copying public label design or use of "Luxe for less"
- Main task: fitting in with the whole shop environment and image
- Public label
- Used by manufactures
- Familiar to and recognized by customers
- Brand equity
- Emotions
- Values attached
- Catchy design and colors
- Assumed to be more preferred
- Private label
Outcomes and Analysis
- Insignificant outcomes
- Average Fixation
- Time-to-first-Fixation
- Significant outcomes
- Higher crossover visit count for public
- Higher total fixation time for public
- Higher number of total fixations for public
- Takeaways
- Neither label has a attention-grabbing advantage
- More time spent on public
- Public observed more often
- Due to familarity with public, higher number of re-visits
- Insignificant outcomes
The experiment
- Participants
- 21-50 years
- 57 usable participants
- Design
- Neutral environment
- University Lab
- Neutral shopping list
- University Lab
- Two cereal boxes with the same price
- Eyetracking
- Neutral environment
- Future outlook
- Experiments with price as factor
- Apply more realistic settings
- Participants
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Consumer's preference to public versus private label, erstellt von Fabian Wicking am 27/06/2017.
- Erstellt von
- Fabian Wicking
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung