GoConqr hat ein neues Design! Sag uns, wie es dir gefällt.

Notizen

1_LSAT Prep Lecture II Intro to Arguments: Advanced Labeling

sam soliman LSAT Law School Admission Test (LSAT) Englisch 1 Seite

Inhalt der Notizen (1)

Seite 1

The bottom three boxes introduce the terminology for this lesson. For some initial clarification, "context" can either mean…

The bottom three boxes introduce the terminology for this lesson. For some initial clarification, "context" can either mean…

The bottom three boxes introduce the terminology for this lesson. For some initial clarification, "context" can either mean…

The bottom three boxes introduce the terminology for this lesson. For some initial clarification, "context" can either mean…

The bottom three boxes introduce the terminology for this lesson. For some initial clarification, "context" can either mean…

The bottom three boxes introduce the terminology for this lesson. For some initial clarification, "context" can either mean…

The bottom three boxes introduce the terminology for this lesson. For some initial clarification, "context" can either mean (1) "background information", or (2) "other's/another's argument(s)." Context may have its on premise & conclusion embedded within the reading aside from the author's real argument (or purpose).

The Argument

All Jedi use the force.

Luke is a Jedi. Therefore, Luke

uses the Force.

The (Expanded)

Argument

All Jedi use the force.

Luke is a Jedi. Therefore, Luke

uses the Force. All force users are

powerful. Luke is powerful.

Explanation for “The

Argument”

During the first argument only statements 1, 2 & 3

existed. In such a case, 1 &2

supported 3, which made 3 the conclusion.

Explanation for “The

(Expanded) Argument”

New info changes the dynamics (internal structure). The overall focus changes from “Luke uses the

Force” to “Luke is powerful.” Sentence 3

gets “demoted” from a conclusion to a sub-conclusion

aka intermediate conclusion

(term used by LSAT) aka major premise. It becomes a part of the package that

supports Sentence 5, the major

conclusion.

All 3 words (For, Since, introduce a Premise where a Conclusion is apart of the same sentence.

Examples

Context is either background information OR someone else's argument.

For clarification, "But, Although, However" are words that indicate to the reader that there is either a turn in the argument OR the material will switch to an argument.

Example for I: Context

All Jedi are

However, Tom, who is not a Jedi, is powerful.

Therefore, one does not have to be a Jedi to be powerful.

Explanation for I: Context

Sentence 1 is simply context, having no real impact on on the overall passage. The word "However" indicates to the reader that the important information will come thereafter (aka the passage takes a turn or switched to what you need to be persuaded into).

Example for II: (Other's Arguments)

Explanation for II: (Other's Arguments)

Sentence 1 is context, and simply reports on a general thought without consequence on the remaining statements. Sentence 2 is the premise and uses "But" to flag the reader of the author's forthcoming argument (that he wishes to "separate" from the other argument). Sentence 3 is the info that the author wants to illustrate. Thus, 1 is of no real value and 2 & 3 are the argument (consisting of the premise & conclusion).

three areas of advaced labeling

Sub-conclusions & major premises

For, Since, Because

context v. argument indicators

Informationen

Beschreibung
Law School Admission Test (LSAT) LSAT Notiz am 1_LSAT Prep Lecture II Intro to Arguments: Advanced Labeling, erstellt von sam soliman am 22/12/2015.
Erstellt von
sam soliman · Dez 2015
Aktualisiert
13 Aug 2016
Aufrufe
9
Tags
argurment labelingsub-conclusions & major premisesindicatorscontext v. argument
Verlauf
  • Erstellt von Elder · 22 Dez 2015
  • Kopiert von sam soliman · 22 Dez 2015
Bewertung

Mehr zu Argument Structure

Feedback

Worum geht es?

Wie gefällt dir das neue Design?

Dein Eindruck