8090646
Frage 1
Frage
Damages are the only common law remedy for breach of contract
Antworten
-
True
-
False
Frage 2
Frage
Robinson v Harman - 'the purpose of damages is to put the innocent party back in their original position'
Antworten
-
True
-
False
Frage 3
Frage
What case is the leading authority for determining consequential loss?
Antworten
-
Robinson v Harman
-
Hadley v Baxendale
-
The Heron II
Frage 4
Frage
In Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries, could the innocent party sue for the loss of the potential new contract?
Antworten
-
Yes, exceptional loss if always recoverable
-
No, exceptional loss is not recoverable
Frage 5
Frage
Was the loss of profit in The Heron II considered a reasonably possible result of the breach?
Antworten
-
Yes
-
No
Frage 6
Frage
Was the loss in Jackson v RBS too remote from the breach of the defendant?
Antworten
-
Yes
-
No
Frage 7
Frage
Could the innocent party claim for the loss of the following fixture in The Achilleas?
Antworten
-
Yes
-
No
Frage 8
Frage
Was the 'cost of cure' considered unreasonable by the court in Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth?
Antworten
-
Yes
-
No
Frage 9
Frage
What is the general rule regarding damages for emotional distress?
Antworten
-
They are recoverable
-
They are not recoverable
Frage 10
Frage
However, where MAY a party be awarded damages for emotional distress?
Antworten
-
Where the terms of the contract specify you can sue for this reason
-
Where the central purpose of the contract is enjoyment or relaxation
-
Where children are involved
Möchten Sie mit GoConqr kostenlos Ihre eigenen Quiz erstellen? eigenen Mehr erfahren.