Quiz
Remedies for Breach of Contract
Create a free account to finish this quiz
Save your progress and see your final score.
Already have an account? Sign in
Questions in this quiz (10)
1Damages are the only common law remedy for breach of contract
- ATrue
- BFalse
2Robinson v Harman - 'the purpose of damages is to put the innocent party back in their original position'
- ATrue
- BFalse
3What case is the leading authority for determining consequential loss?
- ARobinson v Harman
- BHadley v Baxendale
- CThe Heron II
4In Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries, could the innocent party sue for the loss of the potential new contract?
- AYes, exceptional loss if always recoverable
- BNo, exceptional loss is not recoverable
5Was the loss of profit in The Heron II considered a reasonably possible result of the breach?
- AYes
- BNo
6Was the loss in Jackson v RBS too remote from the breach of the defendant?
- AYes
- BNo
7Could the innocent party claim for the loss of the following fixture in The Achilleas?
- AYes
- BNo
8Was the 'cost of cure' considered unreasonable by the court in Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth?
- AYes
- BNo
9What is the general rule regarding damages for emotional distress?
- AThey are recoverable
- BThey are not recoverable
10However, where MAY a party be awarded damages for emotional distress?
- AWhere the terms of the contract specify you can sue for this reason
- BWhere the central purpose of the contract is enjoyment or relaxation
- CWhere children are involved
Information
- Description
- Quiz to test your knowledge of principles and case law for remedies
- Author
- Ria Hill
- Language
- English
- Views
- 104
- Tags
- Rating
- 4.0 out of 5 · 1 rating Rate this quiz