Exam quiz

1. 1Reminders: Need to be specific (what's written) when describing analogues rather than trying to state something general that encompasses both. The conclusion needs to include the subject and the analogue: this is to this just as this is to this. And subject and analogue need to include every aspect mentioned. Hidden premises must reflect wording in conclusion, such as should, and explicitly state things mentioned in only the premise(s) or conclusion, If I have no good reason to believe that the plausability of explanas is true, then say low. If I have no good reason to believe the explanatory power, then state this, only rate low if something is problematic.

   1. Aqwertyuiop
   2. Basdfgh
2. 2Circumstances to generalisation.

   1. ASlippery slope
   2. BHasty generalisation
3. 3SIngle instance/situation to generalisation

   1. ASlippery slope
   2. BHasty generalisation
4. 4Circumstances to dismissal.

   1. AGenetic
   2. BAd hominem
5. 5Person/organisation to dismissal.

   1. AGenetic
   2. BAd hominem
6. 6Counter arguments negate _____ when they directly say that they are not true.

   1. AReasons
   2. BConclusions
   3. CInferences
7. 7Counter arguments negate ________ when they negate the conclusion only as a result of the reason given.

   1. AReasons
   2. BInferences
8. 8Plausability of explanas..

   1. A..how likely it is to be true?
   2. B..if true, could it be the cause?
9. 9Unfalsifiable hypothesis

   1. ANever etc
   2. B__
10. 10Confirmation and proof

    1. AWe sbould expect to see..
    2. B..

Beschreibung

Undergraduate Logic & Reasoning Quiz am Exam quiz, erstellt von Imogen Cockayne am 08/06/2017.

Autor

Imogen Cockayne

Sprache

English

Aufrufe

0

Schlagwörter

logic & reasoningundergraduate

Bewertung

Noch keine Bewertungen

Bewerte dieses Quiz

Bewerte dieses Quiz

Mehr zu Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments