7317831
Descripción
Test por Alex Richardson, actualizado hace más de 1 año
|
Creado por Alex Richardson
hace más de 7 años
|
|
Pregunta 1
Pregunta
Why would the vienna circle argue that religious language is meaningless
Respuesta
-
There is no way to prove it
-
Not everyone can take part
-
Different religions will have their own kind of anguage
Pregunta 2
Pregunta
Cognitivism claims what about religous statements
Respuesta
-
they can be true or false, statements express propositions and religous language makes claims about the world
-
all language has meaning
-
all language is an expression of emotion
Pregunta 3
Pregunta
what is an analytical statement
Respuesta
-
a sentence which is true by definition
-
a sentence which is true through verification
-
a sentence which is untrue
Pregunta 4
Pregunta
what type of statement would this be mr miles has six car
Respuesta
-
synthetic
-
analytical
-
meaningless
Pregunta 5
Pregunta
AJ ayer believed that there was strong verification which was verified in practice and verified in theory which requires no evidence.
Respuesta
- True
- False
Pregunta 6
Pregunta
Which of these is an advantage for the verification principle
Respuesta
-
It is not just an argument against God as according to the theory atheists and agnostics
-
Aj Ayer stated that weak verification principle
-
Scientific laws become meaningless
-
Some religous statements might be verifiable in principle, such as biblical events
-
Swinburne argued universal statements cannot be verified so meaningless yet we would agree '
Pregunta 7
Pregunta
What did Richard Swinburne argue
Respuesta
-
Any language is meaningful
-
all universal statements can't be verified
-
all language is meaningless as it is just opinion
Pregunta 8
Pregunta
AJ Ayers version of the verification principle was considered an improvement over the Vienna circle due to the fact that he claimed that we can actually verify through a limited amount of evidence and do not need a physical observation
Respuesta
- True
- False
Pregunta 9
Pregunta
Hick claimed that in fact religious statements are not meaningless due to what reason
Respuesta
-
It is entierly subjective
-
there is no way to verify athiesim
-
these statements could be verified in the after life
Pregunta 10
Pregunta
Why did flew object to religous language
Respuesta
-
He did not believe in God
-
He felt that anything that could be disproved is not valid
-
He felt that scientific terminology was more accurate
Pregunta 11
Pregunta
Mitchell argued that in fact Flew was correct
Respuesta
- True
- False
Pregunta 12
Pregunta
What is the Via Negitiva
Respuesta
-
The idea that God should never be spoken about negatively
-
the theory we can only describe God in a negative way
-
The idea God can be described in both a negative and positive way
Pregunta 13
Pregunta
Some of the problems with religious language are that God is a [blank_start]abstract property[blank_end]. He also does not exist in [blank_start]time[blank_end] or [blank_start]space[blank_end].
Respuesta
-
space
-
time
-
abstract property
Pregunta 14
Pregunta
What two things is religious language considered to be
Respuesta
-
Imposible to prove or disprove
-
disregarding of science
-
inconsistent
-
not open to universal experience
Pregunta 15
Pregunta
Why is religious language seen as being incompatible with our understanding of the world
Respuesta
-
They describe concepts that exist separate from our world.
-
They are unclear on their aims
-
It often contradicts empirical evidence eg ressurection of jesus no human has ever been resurrected
¿Quieres crear tus propios Tests gratis con GoConqr? Más información.