Test
Basic Criminal Damage Cases
Este test tiene tipos de pregunta que se abren en el reproductor de siempre.
Preguntas del test (13)
1The case of [blank_start]GAYFORD v CHOULER[blank_end] states that property must be physically altered, harmed or impaired to be damaged.
- AGAYFORD v CHOULER
2The case of [blank_start]ROE v KINGERLEE[blank_end] states that the jury decides whether property has been destroyed or damaged.
- AROE v KINGERLEE
3The cases of [blank_start]ROE v KINGERLEE[blank_end] and [blank_start]HARDMAN[blank_end] state that it is likely to be criminal damage if it takes money time and/or effort to remove the damage
- AROE v KINGERLEE
- BHARDMAN
4The case of [blank_start]FIAK[blank_end] states that it is criminal damage if the property is temporarily unfit for use.
- AFIAK
5The case of [blank_start]A (A JUVENILE) v R[blank_end] states that it is unlikely to be criminal damage if it requires no cost or effort to clean up.
- AA (A JUVENILE) v R
6The case of [blank_start]MORPHITIS v SALMON[blank_end] states that the purpose of property may be relevant as to whether it is criminal damage or not.
- AMORPHITIS v SALMON
7The case of [blank_start]JAGGARD v DICKINSON[blank_end] states that the belief of lawful excuse under s.5 (2) must be genuinely held, even if the belief wasn't reasonable.
- AJAGGARD v DICKINSON
8The case of [blank_start]HUNT[blank_end] states that for the lawful excuse under s.5 (2) (b) D must destroy property belonging to another in order to protect other property in need of immediate protection.
- AHUNT
9The case of [blank_start]CRESSWELL AND CURRIE[blank_end] states that for lawful excuse under s.5 (2) (b) D must be protecting property.
- ACRESSWELL AND CURRIE
10The case of [blank_start]BAKER AND WILKINS[blank_end] states that D must be protecting property so lawful excuse under s.5 (2) (b) and not a person.
- ABAKER AND WILKINS
11The case of [blank_start]PEMBLITON[blank_end] states the D must intend the damage caused and not merely the offence was caused the damage.
- APEMBLITON
12The case of [blank_start]SMITH[blank_end] states that D will lack the mens rea of criminal damage if he is under the mistaken belief that the property is his own.
- ASMITH
13The case of [blank_start]G AND R[blank_end] states that D can be reckless as to destroying property belonging to another.
- AG AND R
Información
- Descripción
- A2 (Offences Against Property ) Law Test sobre Basic Criminal Damage Cases, creado por Lucy Nove el 08/02/2017.
- Autor
- Lucy Nove
- Idioma
- English
- Visitas
- 37
- Historial
- Creado el 8 feb 2017 · actualizado el 6 abr 2018
- Etiquetas
- Valoración
- Aún sin valoraciones Valora este test