¡GoConqr estrena diseño! Cuéntanos qué te parece.

Mapa mental

case examples of statutory interpretation

ebonyjuddy636 legal Australian Capital Territory - Australian Capital Territory Year 12 Certificate Inglés 1.410 visitas

Mind map of case examples of statutory interpretation: Deing v Tarola, AG v Kevin and Jennifer and Mansfield v Kelly

Mind map: case examples of statutory interpretation

Contenido del mapa

case examples of statutory interpretation

  1. name of case

    • deing v. tarola (1993)
    • AG V. kevin and jennifer and human rights and equal opportunity commission (2003)
    • mansfield v. kelly (1972)
  2. summary of effects

    • a man was charged under the control of weapons regulations 1990(vic.) with possessing a regulated weapon, he was wearing a black sudded belt to hold his trousers which police argued was a weapon
    • kevin was born as a female but had lived as a man and had gender reassignment surgery. kevin and jennifer wanted to get married and applied to the family court to have their marriage validated. the marriage act 1961 required a celebrant perform a marriage between a woman and a man . the attorney general argues that kevin was born female and that a marriage between two females was not valid.
    • defendant was charged under the summary offences act 1966 (vic.) with being drunk in a public place. he was in his private car parked on a public road, and argued he was in a private place.
  3. words to be interpeted.

    • regulated weapons in the control of weapons regulation.
    • man in the marriage act and family law act.
    • public place within s.13 of the summary offences act.
  4. courts decision

    • after consulting a dictionary, legal journals and previous decisions onthe interpretation of 'weapon' , justice beach held that a studded belt used as an article of clothing is not a weapon, although it could be used as one.
      • effects: restricted the definition of weapon to those things likely to be used more offensive or aggressive purpose only.
    • the full court of the family court found that the word 'man' in the statute should be determined at the date of marriage , and they found kevin to be male. the marriage was valid.
      • effect: the word "man" was given its current meaning, and to take into account changes in technology and society.
    • that being in a private car parked in a public place amounted to being in a 'public place'.
      • effect: extended the meaning of 'public place' to include being in a private car parked in a public place.

Información

Descripción
Australian Capital Territory - Australian Capital Territory Year 12 Certificate legal Mapa Mental sobre case examples of statutory interpretation, creado por ebonyjuddy636 el 02/06/2013.
Creado por
ebonyjuddy636
Visitas
1.410
Etiquetas
legal
Valoración

Escríbenos

¿Sobre qué es tu mensaje?

¿Qué te parece el nuevo diseño?

¿Te gusta?