Mapa mental
Applied Ethics
Contenido del mapa
Applied Ethics
Kantian approach to euthanasia
- deontological system- prohibits euthanasia
- someone has a moral duty to others
- e.g carer has a duty to look after patient. so no harm may come to them
- e.g patient has a duty to carer, this prevents them from asking for assisted suicide because of the harm it would cause surrounding people.
- someone has a moral duty to others
- Kant didn't think people should chose death to stop suffering
- logical conclusion
- many things can cause pain, childbirth, sport...
- kant said imagine if every time you were in pain you stopped that activity
- you would have given up most things in life
- to be in pain is therefore no sound criterion, in kantian thought.
- you would have given up most things in life
- kant said imagine if every time you were in pain you stopped that activity
- many things can cause pain, childbirth, sport...
- logical conclusion
- kant believed assisted suicide created a society far removed from the the Summum Bonum
- deontological system- prohibits euthanasia
Utilitarian approach to abortion
- no single view on abortion
- utilitarians are divided in how to apply the principle of utility
- however, there are fundamentals which all utilitarians hold.
- no absolute value on human life
- allows utilitarians to move on from the issue of when life begins
- the consequences of an action determine whether an act should take place or not
- whatever the benefit might be of an action, it should be determined by whether it benefits the maximal number of people
- no absolute value on human life
- utilitarians do differ on several issues
- what is the greatest good?
- classical utilitarians thought of this in terms of happiness and pleasure
- modern utilitarians refer to the maximisation of welfare rather than happiness
- what is the greatest good?
- preference utilitarians
- refer to what is in the best interest of all people involved
- this is problematic
- e.g a woman might argue its in her best interest to have an abortion, her family and the father of her child might disagree
- who decides?
- e.g a woman might argue its in her best interest to have an abortion, her family and the father of her child might disagree
- this is problematic
- refer to what is in the best interest of all people involved
- rule utilitarians
- they create a basic rule to judge all abortions
- this had advantages and problems
- they create a basic rule to judge all abortions
- no single view on abortion
Información
- Descripción
- Mapa Mental sobre Applied Ethics, creado por 049555 el 05/04/2016.
- Creado por
- 049555
- Visitas
- 0
- Valoración