Test
SeaGen tidal case study
Este test tiene tipos de pregunta que se abren en el reproductor de siempre.
Preguntas del test (20)
1Who wrote the paper on this case study.
- ADevine-Wright 2015
- BDevine-Wright 2013
- CDevine-Wright 2011
2How many methods did Devine-Wright (2011) use?
- A1
- B2
- C3
3How many participants took part in the focus groups?
- A3 groups of 22 participants
- B3 groups of 32 participants
- C4 groups of 22 participants
- D4 groups of 32 participants
4How many people were successfully surveyed in the questionnaire?
- An=280
- Bn=290
- Cn=300
5What was the significant difference between Portaferry and Strangford?
- APortaferry sample were younger
- BStrangford sample indicated higher educational attainment
- CPortaferry sample had lived longer in the place
6What did the developers argue?
- AAnimals could adapt to the environment
- BThe structure is very quiet
- CUnavoidably, the structure visibly moves
- DMost the structure is concealed by the sea
7How much energy does the turbine generate?
- A1.2 MW scale
- B12 MW scale
- C120 MW scale
8How long are the strong propeller blades in the water?
- A15m
- B16m
- C17m
- D18m
9[blank_start]Portaferry[blank_end] people were a lot less sure and were undecided about the project but had very few people strongly support or object to it.
- APortaferry
10How far are Portaferry and Strangford from the turbine?
- APortaferry is closer
- BStrangford is closer
- CThey are equidistance
11What was available but not widely attended?
- AA meeting
- BPublic exhibition
- CFilled out a survey
- DSigned a petition
- EWritten a letter of support or objection
- FAll of the above
12Levels of place attachment were significant in both Strangford and Portaferry
- AVerdadero
- BFalso
13The stronger the [blank_start]place attachment[blank_end], the stronger the [blank_start]support[blank_end]
- Aplace attachment
- Bsupport
14Why was the project well received?
- AIt has been done lots of times so people have faith it will work
- BIt was seen the technology fitted well with the place
- CPeople engaged highly in procedural planning
- DPeople thought there were lots of community benefits
15Tidal energy is good because it can be predicted when the tide will come a year in advance
- AVerdadero
- BFalso
16Why can producers get one step ahead in development?
- AOther countries are focused on other technologies
- BThere is no incentive for other countries to make a profit
- CThe technology is not fully developed
17Why was there concern about the village of Portaferry?
- AThe lack of amenities for youths
- BThe closure of the supermarket
- CDeclining number of tourists visiting
18Why was there local support for the project in Portaferry?
- AVisually it blends in well - natural colours and lighthouse similarities
- BMakes navigation easier with lights on the turbine as the Loch is notoriously difficult
- CThe project would directly benefit the economy
- DEnhances tourism and specific interest in the place
19Why was the project supported on a global level in Portaferry?
- AIt puts Portaferry on the map because of this being the first experimental structure in the world, receiving media coverage
- BIt puts Portaferry on the map because of this being the first pioneering structure in the world, receiving media coverage
- CIt puts Portaferry on the map because of this being the first tidal technology in the world, receiving media coverage
20Why was there local concern in Strangford?
- AEcological impacts on fishing and baby seals being killed
- BMinimal new employment for local residents as only one safety man was employed
- CProcedural justice - concerned about how quickly everybody approved and worried the developers were just concerned about money and used PR to market it differently
Información
- Descripción
- Test sobre SeaGen tidal case study, creado por Alex Holt el 05/05/2017.
- Autor
- Alex Holt
- Idioma
- English
- Visitas
- 2
- Etiquetas
- Valoración
- Aún sin valoraciones Valora este test