Basic UE concepts

Description

Unjustified Enrichment Flashcards on Basic UE concepts, created by alicetait on 10/04/2013.
alicetait
Flashcards by alicetait, updated more than 1 year ago
alicetait
Created by alicetait over 11 years ago
92
0

Resource summary

Question Answer
transfer benefit from conferral of property or money or performance of services
taking use of anothers property money or rights for own benefit
imposition improvement of another persons property or payment of their debt
incidental enrichment chance outcome of the pursuer’s expenditure. act for own benefit = indecently confers benefit another = no relevant loss suffered = latter didnt cost extra £ exchange telegraph = ^ that applies
equity the court may take account of, and balance, all factors effecting the relationship between the parties before deciding to order the restoration/payment of the enrichment
Findlay TAKING and transfer ox case
Toet taking case occupation with no title
earl of fife taking defender possessed land under invalid lease- held to be enriched by this
shetland islands council taking unauth'd use of anothers property failed negociataions after 10 years of defender using ground of council- BP held to be liable to the extent of the annual worth of the land
AG Barr advertising board after lease expired- negotiations failed but defender continued to use 17th months after the expiry- liable for annual worth over period
BASIC REQUIRMENTS lord Rodger- Dollar Land Ltd 1) enrichment 2) at anothers expense 3) the enrichment is unjustified 4) reversal must be equitable
Glen father consented to sons lease of house without formal lease in place. he was liable to pay for the enrichment arising from occupation as no intneton for it to be gift.
Bennett taking pursuer had not finalized contract for purchasing pub- but had began to pay rates etc in building. went abroad and on return it was leased to someone else- they had been paying rates by drawing cheques on his account but was liable to reimburse pursuer
Barbour Imposition - exception bad faith pursuer had been given title deeds (but didnt own) for land. he improved it. real owner returned from america- reclaimed land. no recovery of expenditure on improvements by B
Newton imposition no need for apparent title thought he owned wifes house- improved it - successfully recovered money as error was in good faith.
Cases from tutorial- should pay close attention to Newton Jamieson Credit Lyonnais Peter Walker & Sons Satchwell Shilliday Watt
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

TRANSFER
alicetait
EQUITY/ DEFENCES AND REMEDIES
alicetait
unjustified enrichment
alicetait
imposition
alicetait
TAKING
alicetait
Geometry Theorems
PatrickNoonan
Mapa Mental - Como Criar um Mapa Mental
miminoma
ICT Key Terms Quiz - Part 1
Mr Mckinlay
AQA Physics P1 Quiz
Bella Statham
Mind Maps with GoConqr
Manikandan Achan
SFDC App Builder 1 (126-150)
Connie Woolard