Diligence and Personal insolvency Cases

Question	Answer
Diligence is strictis iuris	Atlas Appointments (No2) v Tinsley
Grant by inhibitee is not voluntary if already concluded missives	Halifax v Smith
Land adjudication – if sold, excess is given to debtor	Hull v Campbell
Arrestable – shares	Sinclair v Staples
arrestable - contingent liability	Boland v White Cross Insurance
arrestable - goods in possession of a third party	Moore & Weinberg
Social security payments are not arrestable even if in a bank account	North Lanarkshire Council v Crossen
Diligence on the dependence – not compatible with ECHR	karl Construction
diligence on the dependence - Swing back to pursuer(?)	McCormick v Hamilton Academics FC
Requirements for common law challenge	Nordic Travel v Scotprint

Resource summary

	Created by katy_mcbride12 about 11 years ago