Social Psychology

Obedience
1. Milgram(1963)62.5%
  1. Varaitions
    1. Victim is silent-100% Dehuminisation
    2. Victim in the same room-40%- Huminisation
    3. Run-Down Blocks-48% Legitmate Authority
    4. Forces hand on shock plate-30% Huminisation
    5. Experimenter over the phone- 20.5% Cohersion
    6. Two confederates-150 volts and 210 volts- Social Support
    7. Confederates only give shocks not words- 92.5%- Agentic Shift
  2. Evaluations Orne
    1. Internal validity-phone
    2. Ecological-Hofling and Bickman
    3. Population-Kilmann and Mann 16%F and 40% M
    4. Ethics
      1. Consent but decit
      2. Right to Withdraw-opposed hints
      3. Psychological harm- extreme stress
2. Hofling(1966)
  1. Nurses-Dr smith-Phone call-20miligrambottle10 -21/22
3. Bickman(1974)
  1. Guard 89%. Milkman 57%. Civilian 33%
4. Explanations
  1. Legitmate Authority
  2. Coerion
  3. Agentic Shift/state
  4. Gradual Commitment
  5. Dehuminsation
Differences in Obedience + Conformity
1. Obedience-direct exercise of power, Authority- desire for acceptance
2. Obedience-Authority, Conformity-group
3. Obedience-hgiher status, Authority-same social status
Conformity
1. Information Social Influences (Need to be Liked)
  1. Woolworths
  2. Rodin Pillivan+ Rodin (fire in the room)
  3. Sherif (1935) (Auto Kinetic Effect)
    Attachments:
    - Social Psychology - created from Mind Map
  4. Internationlisation (change behaviour and opinion)
2. Normative Social Influences (Need to be Right)
  1. Compliance (change your behaviour not your mind)
  2. Asch (1951) (32%)-Lines
    Attachments:
    - Social Psychology - created from Mind Map_3
    1. Varitions
      1. Nom of confederates ( two 13%, three 32%)
        Attachments:
        Social Psychology - created from Mind Map_4
      2. Confederates doesn't conform (drops 5.5%)
      3. The more difficult the lower the conformity
      4. If answer written (drops 12.5%) e.g. riddicile and dissaprroval
      5. Time Validity- vary e.g. effected by social change
      6. Cultural varaition- different levels of cohesion and independence(0.25% UK)
      7. Smith and Bond(1996)Meta analysis 134
        Attachments:
        Social Psychology - created from Mind Map_5
3. Factors Affecting Conformity
  1. Conforming to social norms- Zimbardo
  2. Group Size
  3. Social Support
  4. Personality- facist etc
  5. Group Identity
Individual Differences
1. Resisting Obedience
  1. Questioning Motives-Status of Authority - Milgram downtown 47.5%
  2. Social Support -10% 150,210
  3. Responsibility/empathy 35% blind obedience
  4. Reactance-sense of freedom
  5. Time for discussion - gamson- Footage
  6. Humanised-30%shock plate
2. Resisting conformity
  1. Desire for individualism- Snyner+Fromkin-assert indivuality
  2. Maintain control-obvious pressure- Daubman desirability control scale - how hints were taken
  3. Social support - Milgram dropped 8.7% other conferadtes
  4. Prior commitment -Acsh Varation-Pubically announce first 0%changed
3. Independent Differences on Behaviuor
  1. Locus of control
    1. Rotter (1966) - questionnaire- internal(no luck) less likely to conform
    2. Miller(1975)- external more obedient but only to higher status - interal no status
    3. E: mixed results, other factors

Next up

Social Psychology

Description

Resource summary

Similar

	Created by miabond007 over 10 years ago