Social Psychology - Social Influence

Mind Map by , created over 6 years ago

Psychology (Social Psychology) Mind Map on Social Psychology - Social Influence, created by ebramhall on 05/07/2013.

Created by ebramhall over 6 years ago
Social Expertise 1
Why do people obey?
Jessica Phillips
Conformity Types and Explanations
Elliot O'Leary
Biology (B2)
Asch Study and Variations
Social Influence
Chloe Woods
Social Approach
Ethics In Psychology Research
Social - Expertise 2
Social Psychology - Social Influence
1 Conformity
1.1 The tendency to change what we do, think and say in response to the influence of others or social pressure
1.2 Compliance
1.2.1 The most superficial type
1.2.2 Person conforms publicly
1.2.3 Continue to privately disagree
1.2.4 E.g. - laughing at a joke while privately not finding it funny
1.3 Internalisation
1.3.1 The deepest type of conformity
1.3.2 Taking on the view of a group at a deep and permanent level - Conversion
1.3.3 E.g. - A student who becomes a vegetarian whilst sharing a flat with animal rights activists at university They may retain these views and continue to be a vegetarian for the rest of their life
1.4 Research into Conformity
1.4.1 Asch (1951) Unambiguous task Participants shown a series of lines

Attachments: Had to compare the line on the left with the lines on the right and state which ones matched (A, B, C, or D) 123 Participants All but one of the participants were "confederates" Instructed the confederates to give the same incorrect answer on 12 of the 18 trials "Critical Trials" The true participant was always the last or penultimate one to answer Found a mean conformity rate of 37% I.e - Participants agreed with the incorrect majority answer on just over one third of the critical trials. Very high considering the unambiguous and easy nature of the task. Within the 37%, there were wide individual differences as 5% conformed on every critical trial yet 25% remained completely independent, going against the majority and giving the correct answer on all 12 trials Asch's research suggests that people tend to conform to a majority group so that they don't stand out from the crowd
1.4.2 Evaluation of Asch's Research - Low Temporal Validity McCarthyism During this era (1950s), thousands of Americans were accused of being Communists or communist sympathisers and became the subject of questioning before the government This would have made people a lot more reluctant to stand out from the crowd - Population Validity The participants in this study were all American male students Androcentric study As this is only a small percentage of the people in America, the results from the study cannot be generalised to a wider population that includes females Low ecological validity - Ethics Deception The participants were not informed about what the experiement would test them on whether they conform or not Justified as experiment would not work otherwise + Lab Experiment Easy to repeat (Test - Retest) More reliability - Perrin & Spencer Replicated Asch's study In their initial study, they obtained only one conforming result out of 396 trials Used a group of science and engineering students In a subesquent study, they found similar levels of conformity to the original Asch study Used youths on probation Showed that the "Asch effect" is not a stable phenomenon Smith & Bond Meta-analysis of conformity studies Using the Asch paradigm Found that there has been a steady decline in conformity since the original Asch study Independent cultures tended to show lower conformity rates than collectivist cultures The more ambiguous the task, the higher the levels of conformity rates in all cultures
1.5 Explanations of why people Conform
1.5.1 Normative Social Influence Based on the desire to be liked Involves public compliance Individual does not privately comply or change their views
1.5.2 Informational Social Influence Based on the desire to be right Involves an individual pubicly and privately changing their views More permanent

Media attachments