1430097
Neto (1995) and
Smith & Bond (1988)
- Does it support, challenge or develop Asch?
- Neto
- Developed as they
only used female
participants and it showed
that females tended to
conform more than males
- Developed as they
only used female
participants and it showed
that females tended to
conform more than males
- Smith and
Bond
- Developed as they tested
collectivist and
individualist societies and
found that people from
collectivist societies
tended to conform more
- Developed as they tested
collectivist and
individualist societies and
found that people from
collectivist societies
tended to conform more
- Neto
- Similarities
- They both
used the same
procedure as
Asch did
- They both
used the same
procedure as
Asch did
- Differences
- Neto
- The study was
more recent so it's
more applicable to
today's society
- Only used women
- The study was
more recent so it's
more applicable to
today's society
- Smith and Bond
- They ran the trials in
different societies
(collectivist and
individualist)
- They did
it in 17
countries
- They ran the trials in
different societies
(collectivist and
individualist)
- Neto
- Conclusion (therefore…)
- They show that conformity exists
in different societies, but it
occurs differently in each,
showing that Asch's study has
some reliability
- It shows that Asch's study has some external
validity as it can be generalised to different
groups and societies
- They show that conformity exists
in different societies, but it
occurs differently in each,
showing that Asch's study has
some reliability
Want to create your own Mind Maps for free with GoConqr? Learn more.