AQA A-Level Sociology: Gender Differences in Education - Gender and Subject Choice
Description
All credit goes to the 'AQA A Level Sociology Book One [Including AS Level]'. Any opinions expressed are the opinions of the sociologists mentioned. Author credits: Rob Webb, Hal Westergaard, Keith Trobe and Annie Townend
AQA A-Level Sociology: Gender Differences in Education - Gender and Subject Choice
NATIONAL CURRICULUM OPTIONS
Where there is a choice in
the National Curriculum, girls
and boys choose differently.
For example, although design and
technology is a compulsory subject,
girls tend to choose the food
technology option,, whereas boys
choose graphics and resistant
materials.
AS AND A LEVELS
Gendered subject choices become
more noticeable after 16, when
students have more choice.
There are big gender
differences in entries for
A Level subjects, with boys
opting for maths and
physics, and girls choosing
subjects such as sociology,
English and languages.
The Institute of Physics
(2012) found that the
proportion of A-Level
Physics students who are
girls has been
"stubbornly consistent", at
around 20%, for over 20
years.
VOCATIONAL
COURSES
Vocational courses prepare
students for particular
careers. Gender segregation
is a very noticeable feature
of vocational training.
Only one in 100 childcare
apprentices is a boy.
EXPLANATIONS FOR GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SUBJECT CHOICE
Gender role socialisation
Gender role
socialisation is the
process of learning
the behaviour
expected of males
and females in
society.
Early socialisation shapes
children's gender identity.
Fiona Norman (1988)
notes that from an early
age, boys and girls are
dressed differently, given
different toys and
encouraged to take part
in different activities.
Eileen Byrne (1979) shows
that teachers encourage
boys to be tough and show
initiative and not be weak
or behave like 'sissies'
Girls on the other hand are
expected to be quiet, helpful,
clean and tidy.
As a result of
differences in
socialisation, boys and
girls develop different
tastes in reading.
Patricia Murphy
and Jannette
Elwood (1998)
show how these
differences lead
to different
subject choices.
Boys read hobby books
and information texts,
whilst girls are more likely
to read stories about
people.
This helps to explain why
boys prefer science
subjects and girls prefer
subjects such as English.
Gender domains
Naima Browne and
Carol Ross (1991)
argue that children's
belief about gender
domains are shaped
by their early
experiences and the
expectations of
adults.
Gender
domains are
the tasks and
activities that
boys and girls
see as male or
female
territory.
Children are more confident when
engaging in tasks that they see as
part of their own gender domain. For
example, when they are set the same
mathematical task, girls are more
confident in tackling it when it is
presented as being about food and
nutrition, whereas boys are more
confident about cars.
Patricia Murphy (1991) found that boys
and girls pay attention to different
details even when tackling the same
task.
Girls focus more on how
people feel, whereas boys
focus on how things are
made and work..
GENDERED SUBJECT IMAGES
The gendered image of a subject
affects who will want to choose it.
Kelly argues that science is seen as a
boys' subject for several reasons
Science teachers are more likely to be men.
The examples
teachers and
textbooks use often
draw on boys' rather
than girls' interests.
In science lessons, boys monopolise
the apparatus and dominate the
laboratory, acting as if it is theirs.
Anne Colley (1998)
notes that computer
studies is seen as a
masculine subject for
two reasons
It involves working with
machines - part of the male
gender domain.
The way it is taught
is off-putting to
females.
Tasks tend to be
abstract and
teaching styles
formal, with few
opportunities for
group work, which
girls favour.
SINGLE-SEX SCHOOLING
Pupils who attend
single-sex schools tend to
hold less stereotyped
subject images and make
less traditional subject
choices.
Diana Leonard (2006)
found that, compared
to pupils in mixed
schools, girls in girls'
schools were more
likely to take maths
and science A Levels.
Boys in boys' schools
were more likely to
pick English and
languages.
Girls from single-sex schools were also
more likely to study male-dominated
subjects at university.
The Institute of Physics
found that girls in
single-sex schools were 2
. 4 times more likely to
take A-Level Physics than
those in mixed schools.
They also found that lack of
female scientists on the
television can influence
perceptions of Physics.
GENDER IDENTITY & PEER PRESSURE
Subject choice can be
influenced by peer pressure.
Other boys and girls may
apply pressure to an
individual if they disapprove
of his or her choice.
Boys tend to opt out
of music and dance
because such activities
fall outside of their
gender domain and so
are likely to attract
bullying from peers.
Carrie Paechter (1998)
found that because pupils
see sport as mainly within
the male gender domain,
girls who are sporty have to
cope with an image that
contradicts the conventional
female stereotype.
Therefore girls are more likely than boys to opt out of sport.
Alison Dewar (1990)
studied an American
college and found that
male students would
call girls 'lesbian' or
'butch' if they appeared
to be interested in
sport.
GENDERED CAREER OPPORTUNITIES
One reason why there
are gender differences
in subject choice is
because employment
is highly gendered.
Jobs tend to be
sex-typed as men's or
women's. Women's
jobs often involve
work similar to that
performed by
housewives, such as
childcare or nursing.
Over half of all women's
employment falls within only
four categories: clerical,
secretarial, personal services
and occupations such as
cleaning.
This will cause pupils to
opt out of courses that
will lead them to careers
that are considered to not
be in their gender-domain.
For example, a
male pupil may
choose not to do
a childcare course
because childcare
is seen as a
female job.
GENDER, VOCATIONAL CHOICE & CLASS
Working-class pupils in
particular may make
decisions about vocational
courses that are based on
a traditional sense of
gender identity.
Carol Fuller (2011) states
that most of the
working-class girls she
studied had ambitions to
go into jobs such as
childcare or hair and
beauty.
This reflected their
working-class
habitus - their sense
of what is realistic
for people like them.
These ambitions may arise
out of work experience
placements, which are often
gendered and classed.
Fuller found that placements in
feminine, working-class jobs
such as nursery teaching and
retail work were overwhelmingly
the norm for girls in her study.
She concludes that the school was
implicitly steering girls towards
certain jobs - and hence certain
vocational courses - through the work
experience placements they were
offered.