taken in by sense and
encoded into manageable
form
based on scientific theory
and uses scientific method
- lab exps.
Computer
Analogy
Input,
processing,
output
Much more complex,
unlimited info taken in,
output more complex
(eg. body lang)
Useful analogy as
we don't
understand the
brain fully yet
Models of Memory
MSM
Sensory
memory: buffer
for all info
taken in by
sense, holds for
shortest period,
until attention
is paid.
Short-term memory: Limited
7(+/-2), 18-30secs, if rehearsed
--> transferred to
LTM.(VISUAL ENCODING)
Long-term memory; Infinite
capacity, minutes to years,
durable memory, (VISUAL,
ACOUSTIC, SEMANTIC ENCODING)
S: Glanzer & Cunitz
(1966)- Primary +
Recency, list of
words, first and last
remembered, first
rehearsed, last in
STM.
O: Shallice &
Warriington -
Motorcyclist, damaged
STM, can make LTMs,
contradicts linear
stages.
D: LOP- more
emphasis on level of
processing, semantic
needed for durable
memory, MSM says
rehearsal
A: Revision- rehearse
repeatedly to transfer
STM to LTM, more able
to retrieve in exam and
achieve higher marks
ATKINSON & SHIFFRIN
(1968, 1971)
LOP
Two Types of rehearsal: Maintenance-
to preserve for short-period.
Elaborative- deeper consideration,
meaning, durable memory
Three types of
processing:
Structural - look//
Phonetic - sound//
Semantic - meaning
S: Craik & Tulving (1974) - 40 words with
questions (require different processing).
17% (St), 36% (Ph), 65% (Se)
O: Morris et al (1977) -
Recalled more phonetically
processed - contradicts LOP.
D: MSM - emphasis on rehearsal, not depth
of processing (semantic and elaborative)
A: Revision - practice questions, write
up notes differently, consider meaning
-> improve recall, achieve higher marks
CRAIK & LOCKHART (1972)
CDF
Failure to remember is accessibility problem
- need to access in same way.
When we encode a memory, we store
info around it (setting) --> If we cannot
remember, different environment
Tulving's encoding specificity principle -
'The greater the similarity between the
encoding and retrieval events, the
greater the likelihood of remembering all
the info'
S: Godden & Baddeley (1975) -
when in different environement,
50% lower recall, supports theory
(context cues)
O: Criticisms - Low in
generalisability -
18pp,more male, divers,
uni students in scotland
D: Interference theory - failure to
remember is memory being
interrupted, proactive % retroactive
interference, (not accessibility problem)
A: Revision - similar
environment (silence,
desk), context cues aid
recall, achieve higher
marks.
Interference Theory
Failure to remember = failure
to retrieve due to disruption
(new or previous learning)
Info is
confused or
combined
during
encoding
Types of interference: Retroactive
- new learning interferes //
Proactive - old learning interferes.
As we learn more, info becomes harder to access.
s: Dallenback (1924) - Trained two
groups of cockroaches to do a
maze, tested them 8 hours later. !
group put in cotton wool to
hibernate (inactive), others left to
roam (active), Active made 3X
more mistakes (retroactive
interference)
O: CDF Godden & Baddeley - list of
words, 4 conditions, recalled 50% less
in different environment (failure to
remember is due to change in
environment). BUT interference
suggests due to old or new learnt
info disrupting.
D: CDF - change in environment
or state cues --> forget, whereas
disruption --> forget.
A: Revision - Revise right before the
exam and not revise anything else
in between (to prevent retroactive
interference) - and small/alternating
periods of time.
KEY TERMS
Info
Processing:
The brains
way of taking
in and storing
information
(Inc, input,
processing,
output).
Memory:
Retrieval of
info or past
experiences
from the
brain
Forgetting: Not
being able to
retrieve previously
processed info.
Storage: The
place in which
your brain keeps
all processed info
Retrieval: How the
brain accesses
previously stored info