Mind map
Evolutionary Explanations of Gender Roles
Map content
Evolutionary Explanations of Gender Roles
Mate choice
- Men look for partners who are physically attractive (suggests fertility). Women are additionally interested in the resources a partner might be able to provide
- Buss, 1989 - Cross Cultural Study
- Men look for partners who are physically attractive (suggests fertility). Women are additionally interested in the resources a partner might be able to provide
IDAs
- Approaches
- Biosocial
- Alternative view is that behaviour is affected by nurture
- Determinism
- Evolutionary approach is deterministic but genes don't determine our behaviour only predispose us to certain behaviours
- Approaches
Division of labour
- Role division may have evolved because women would have spent most of their adult life pregnant or producing milk
- If women hunted the reproductive success of the group would decrease
- Kuhn and Stiner, 2006 - suggests gender division of labour might explain survival of the homo sapiens and not the Neanderthals
- Both men and female Neanderthals used to hunt
- Kuhn and Stiner, 2006 - suggests gender division of labour might explain survival of the homo sapiens and not the Neanderthals
- If women hunted the reproductive success of the group would decrease
- Role division may have evolved because women would have spent most of their adult life pregnant or producing milk
Cognitive style
- Tend and befriend
- Women may also be more focused on interpersonal relationships
- Taylor et al, 2000 - proposed might stem from different challenges faced when dealing with stress in EEA
- Women may also be more focused on interpersonal relationships
- E-S theory
- Women are better at empathising whereas men are better at systematising
- Baron-Cohen, 2002 - proposed that this gender difference may by the result of selection pressure
- - Suggested that males who were able to systematise with greater precision would have gained an evolutionary advantage
- Tend and befriend
Evaluation
- Research methods
- Problems with the degree to which data collected actually represents the behaviour of people from different cultures
- Speculative theories
- Do not have a firm factual basis
- Example is explanation for the disappearance of the Neanderthals
- Other theories just as plausible include climate change in Europe
- Tzedakis et al, 2007
- Other theories just as plausible include climate change in Europe
- Example is explanation for the disappearance of the Neanderthals
- Do not have a firm factual basis
- Implications
- The meat-sharing hypothesis
- An outcome of men becoming hunters due to selective pressures is meat being used as a means of attracting female interest
- Stanford, 1999
- An outcome of men becoming hunters due to selective pressures is meat being used as a means of attracting female interest
- Autism
- Baron-Cohen, 2004 - Proposed that autism may be an example of the extreme male brain
- - Those with autism score high at systematising and low on empathising
- Baron-Cohen, 2004 - Proposed that autism may be an example of the extreme male brain
- The meat-sharing hypothesis
- Research support
- Tend and befriend
- Taylor et al, 2000 - showed that in women levels of oxytocin increased with stress
- Ennis et al, 2001 - conducted a natural experiment to test male-female differences in stress responses
- - Sampled cortisol levels and found it increased in males and decreased in females
- Supports view that women respond to stress of others in a different way
- - Sampled cortisol levels and found it increased in males and decreased in females
- Mate choice
- Differences in how males and females advertise themselves
- Waynforth and Dunbar, 1995 - 44% of males sought physical attractiveness compared to women
- - 50% of women offered attractiveness whereas only 34% of males did
- Waynforth and Dunbar, 1995 - 44% of males sought physical attractiveness compared to women
- Differences in how males and females advertise themselves
- Tend and befriend
- Cognitive style
- Baron-Cohen, 2004 - conducted research to demonstrate that men and women do think in different ways which align with predicted differences in cognitive style
- - Developed a Systematising Quotient Questionnaire
- Found that males tended to be systematisers and females tended to be emphathising
- - Developed a Systematising Quotient Questionnaire
- Baron-Cohen, 2004 - conducted research to demonstrate that men and women do think in different ways which align with predicted differences in cognitive style
- Research methods
Information
- Description
- A Levels Psychology (A2) Mind Map on Evolutionary Explanations of Gender Roles, created by Jessica Phillips on 13/11/2015.
- Created by
- Jessica Phillips
- Views
- 21
- Tags
- Rating