Mapa mental
Intentional Torts

Mind map: Intentional torts
Conteúdo do mapa
Intentional Torts
Types
- Harm to Persons
- Physical
- Battery
- Intentional Act
- Contact
- Harmful or offensive to reasonable person
- R.3d § 101
- Assault
- Intentional Act
- Creates anticipation of an immediate batery
- R.3d § 105
- False Imprisonment
- Confinement
- Big Town Nursing Home
- Conciusness or harm
- Parvi
- No legal justification
- BTNH
- No Reasonable Exit
- Note 3 p. 44
- Confinement
- Battery
- Emotional
- Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
- IIED
- Extreme or outrageous conduct
- Intentional or reckless conduct
- Causes severe emotional Distress
- Harris
- Bystander IIED
- Extreme or outrageous conduct directed at a third party (not the P bringing the claim) AND
- 3rd party is P's family member OR
- P is harmed
- Taylor / R 2d
- Intentionally or recklessly (implies knowledge of bystander/presence of bystander)
- Extreme or outrageous conduct directed at a third party (not the P bringing the claim) AND
- IIED
- Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
- Physical
- Harm to Property
- Trespass to Land
- Intentional Act
- Unauthorized entry into the "close" of another
- Dougherty
- Trespass to Chattels
- Intentional Act
- Interfere's with P's possession
- Causes legally cognizable harm
- Compuserve
- Conversion
- Intentional Act
- Exercise Dominion over another's possession
- In a way that seriously interferes with or is seriously incompatible with the P's ownership rights
- Interference is so serious it justifies forced sale
- Pearson
- Trespass to Land
- Harm to Persons
Elements
- Act
- Failure to act does not count
- Voluntary
- Intent
- Purposefully
- Substantial Certainty
- Recklessly (IIED Only)
- Causation
- Damage
- Act
Defenses
- Defense of self
- Reasonable belief
- Note 3, p. 110
- Not in retaliation
- Note 2 (p. 110)
- Proportionate to threat
- Note 5, p. 112
- Reasonable belief
- Defense of Others
- Same principles as self-defense
- Note 1, p. 113
- Two approaches
- Can defend even if reasonably mistaken in perceiving need for intervention
- R.2d
- Privileged only if person being defended would be privileged
- Noted 2, p. 113
- Can defend even if reasonably mistaken in perceiving need for intervention
- Same principles as self-defense
- Defense of Property
- No deadly force to protect property, directly or through mechanical devices
- Katko
- Deadly force for burglary (breaking into a dwelling at night) under castle doctrine
- Note 5d, p. 119
- No deadly force to protect property, directly or through mechanical devices
- Defense of self
Privileges
- Necessity
- Private
- Incomplete Privilege
- Available when harm is serious, imminent, and legally cognizable
- Not for convenience
- R.2d
- Public
- Complete Privilege
- Public rather than private interest involved
- Reasonable belief action was necssaray
- Reasonable response to need
- Surroco
- Private
- Authority
- Discipline
- Justification
- Equitable
- Sindle
- Consent
- Informed consent for doctors (see negligence)
- What would a reasonable doctor say?
- What would a reasonable patient want to know?
- Can be signaled by action
- O'Brien
- Limited to general custom or rules of games
- Hackbart
- No privileged if scope of consent exceeded
- Mohr
- Consent is invalid if key information is not disclosed
- De May
- Informed consent for doctors (see negligence)
- Recovery of Property
- May use force to recovery property
- Hodgeden
- Force used must be reasonable
- Note 3, p. 121
- Fresh pursuit
- R.2d
- Shopkeeper's privilege
- Merchant may detain for reasonable investigation persons he reasonably believes to have taken chattel unlawfully
- Bonkowski
- Merchant may detain for reasonable investigation persons he reasonably believes to have taken chattel unlawfully
- May use force to recovery property
- Necessity
Informações
- Descrição
- Mapa Mental sobre Intentional Torts, criado por Doug Crandell em 29-11-2019.
- Criado por
- Doug Crandell
- Visualizações
- 0
- Avaliação