Trainings

Trainings

1. LANGUAGES

   • artificial
     • Brocanto 2
       • Morgan-Short 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014
       • Friederici 2002
     • Non-wd strings
       • Opitz 2011
       • Silva 2016
   • semi-artificial
     • EN lex, GER syn
       • Tagarelli 2015, in prep (verb placement rules)
       • Rebuschat 2008 (word order)
       • Rebuschat Williams 2012 (vb placement rules)
     • Japlish (EN lex, JAP syn)
       • Williams 2005 (det)
       • Leung and Williams 2011 (det)
       • Grey 2014 (case)
     • Other
       • Rogers 2015 (Cezch N in EN sent, case marking)
   • miniature
     • Cleary and Langley 2007 - 3wd seq, mostly EN-like PS
     • Francis 2009 3wd seq NNV/VNN
     • Mueller 2009 Simple It sent
     • Davidson 2011 short PPs
     • Batterink-Neville 2013 mini FR

2. TRAINING

   • Implicit vs Explicit
     • Meaning-based
       • Morgan-Short et al 2010, 2012, 2014
         • Comp/Prod
         • Initial training = Explicit rules / implicit exposure
         • GJT
         • ERPS
       • Tagarelli 2015
         • PLAUSIBILITY
         • Expl = + rules
         • Source attrib
         • Conf rating
         • GJT
       • Batterink Neville 2013
         • IMPL: voc learning, understand
         • EPL: +rules, + test
         • GJT
         • ERPs
     • Incidental vs Intentional
       • Tagarelli in prep
         • Incidental = listen, imitation, PLAUSIBILITY
         • Intentional = listen, discover rules, FonF
         • GJT
         • Conf rating
         • Source attrib
     • Task-essential
       • Sanz & MS 2004
         • [+/-Explanation]
         • [+/- FB]
         • Task-essential = requires to attend to form
       • Rosa & Leow
         • [+/- explicit FB]
         • [+/- explicit pretask]
   • Only implicit
     • incidental
       • Williams 2005
         • Exposure only
         • retrospective reports
         • Told about 1 parameter, other hidden
         • Sentence completion task
       • Leung & Williams 2011
         • choose picture
         • RT
         • verbal reports
       • Cleary and Langley 2007
         • Exposure
         • Recognition task
       • Rebuschat 2008
         • Plausibility judgement
         • GJT
         • conf rating
         • source attrib
       • Francis 2009
         • oral reading task
       • Rebuschat 2012
         • judge plausibility
         • elicited imitation
         • GJT
         • source attrib
         • conf rating
       • Grey et al 2014
         • judge plausibility
         • GJT
         • source attrib
         • conf rating
       • Rogers 2015
         • picture-matching
         • GJT
         • source attrib
         • conf rating
       • Mueller 2009
         • attentive listening
         • GJT
         • ERPs
       • Silva 2016
         • same/different gram seq
           • pref clas
           • ERPs
     • [- expl]
       • Opitz 2011
         • FB [+/- delayed]
         • ERPs
       • Davidson 2011
         • classification task
         • ERPs
         • TR: FB
       • Friederici 2002
         • Comp/Prod
         • Focus on Meaning
         • ERPs
       • White 2012
         • only implicit (immersion prog)
         • GJT DID/HAD + ED
         • ERPs

3. RESULTS

   • Behavioral
     • Explicit > Implicit
       • Tagarelli in prep
       • Rosa Leow 2004
       • Tagarelli 2015
         • EXPL better for simpler structures
       • Grey 2014 case marking
       • Batterink Neville 2013
     • Some explicit knowledge
       • Tagarelli in prep
       • Tagarelli 2015
       • Rebuschat Williams 2012
       • Grey 2014 case marking
       • Rogers 2015: only noticing
     • No diff
       • Sanz 2004 : expl info not necessary
       • MS 2012
     • No awareness
       • Williams 2005
       • Leung and Williams 2011
       • Rebuschat 2008
       • Francis 2009
       • Grey 2015 word order
   • ERPs
     • No diff Expl/Impl
       • Batterink and Neville 2013 : P600, same amp VS NS = AN + P600
       • MS 2010 HIGH: N400/P600
     • Impl > Expl
       • MS 2012: LOW Imp N400 vs Exp rien + HIGH Imp AN + P600 vs Exp Pos + P600
       • MS 2010: LOW Imp N400 vs Exp rien
   • Indiv Diff
     • WM most relevant in explicit cond
       • Tagarelli in prep
     • Inhibitory control = neg corr w perf for impl L
       • Tagarelli 2015
     • Rel L2/Decl M at beginning, then L2/Proced M
       • MS 2013