Mapa mental
week 2 rms2
Conteúdo do mapa
week 2 rms2
measures used in psych
- self report
- overt behaviour
- physiological
- behavior measurements can be based on
- rate
- duration
- frequency
- latency
- intensity
- accuracy
- intensity
- latency
- frequency
- duration
- measurement of abstract constructs
- verbal / non verbal behaviour
- overt actions
- physiological responses
- overt actions
- why is measurement important
- research may fail to find real effect
- research find false effect
- findings may be inconsistent across replication
- research find false effect
- research may fail to find real effect
- verbal / non verbal behaviour
- rate
RELIABILITY
- getting consistent measures across time
- a reliable measure is
- consistent, stable,trustworthy and predictable
- necessary due to constant error
- if reliability is .40 then validity's ceiling is .40
- measure value = true value + error
- reducing error increases reliability
- measure value = true value + error
- if reliability is .40 then validity's ceiling is .40
- a reliable measure is
- reliablility is a prereq for validity
- if not reliable it is not valid
- being reliable dosnt mean its valid
- the more reliable= the more potential of validity
- measurement error :
- systematic error (bias)
- will vary in a certain ways across levels of the IV
- environmental, participant, experimenter, measuring tools
- major threat to internal validity
- have potential to bias if changed from experimental conditions.
- environmental, participant, experimenter, measuring tools
- will vary in a certain ways across levels of the IV
- random error
- is unsystematic
- does not vary in any particular way across iv levels
- will influence individual scores
- increase in some decrease others
- has less effect on group mean
- if error truly random it balances out to 0
- will form a normal distribution
- if error truly random it balances out to 0
- will increase variability in the scores
- make manipulation of iv harder to detect
- ways to assess reliability
- test retest reliability
- give same measure to same subject twice
- used for most meaures
- indicates how stable measure over time
- examine relationship between T1 & T2
- retest coefficent
- .60 cut off (some .70)
- vary from 0 - +1
- retest coefficent
- examine relationship between T1 & T2
- indicates how stable measure over time
- used for most meaures
- give same measure to same subject twice
- inter observer(rate) agreement
- inter observer(rate) reliability
- Used when measurements are based on ratings/scores
- Measures consistency between rater
- For quantitative data, it is the square of the correlation between the two raters
- range from 0-1
- Indicates the percentage of relationship between the two rater
- should be above .70
- interobserver agreement/reliability improved by
- training raters
- Simplifying their task ie less catagories
- replacing poor rate
- Indicates the percentage of relationship between the two rater
- range from 0-1
- For quantitative data, it is the square of the correlation between the two raters
- Measures consistency between rater
- Used when measurements are based on ratings/scores
- Used when measurements are based on ratings/scores
- indicates extent of difference rater give from same infomation
- test 2 raters to see if there are similar
- ie 2 rate 10 measures and see how many they both got the same
- Will range from 0 to 100% (the higher the better)
- ie 2 rate 10 measures and see how many they both got the same
- test 2 raters to see if there are similar
- indicates extent of difference rater give from same infomation
- inter observer(rate) reliability
- internal consistency
- test retest reliability
- sources of error
- environment
- participants
- experimenter
- measuring tools
- experimenter
- participants
- Administration should be standardised
- environment
- systematic error (bias)
- getting consistent measures across time
Informações
- Descrição
- Mapa Mental sobre week 2 rms2, criado por dman gutter em 09-03-2016.
- Criado por
- dman gutter
- Visualizações
- 0
- Avaliação