O GoConqr está de visual novo! Conte para nós o que você achou.

Mapa mental

Qualitative Methods

Tere S. Alemão

Conteúdo do mapa

Qualitative Methods

  1. empiricist explanatory studies of norm evolution

  2. interpretative studies, reflecting on social meaning and how the social world is produced

    • rejection of scientific inference
  3. NO particular epistemology

  4. Data collection

    • interviews *
      • focus groups
        • internet based research
          • archieval/document based research
            • monuments/maps/arts
              • in any case: TRIANGULATION matters, relying on multiple sources of data
                • in order to protect reader from misinformation (e.g. stemming from biased interviews)
                  • we must be transparent about documents used and NOT used (the scope)
                • MAKES VISIBLE inconsistencies (e.g. btw interviews and media reports)
            • most common
              • primary doc (original)
                • secondary doc (ref to original)
                • treaties
                  • official reports
                    • policy statements
                      • legislation
                        • media reports
                          • distinction: international media sources & newspapers
                            • newspapers: might be ideologically biased
                • detailed insight into organization
                  • however, no unlimited (full & complete) access
                    • concealing of day to day practices & dec. making process
                      • no answer to HOW decisions came about
                        • question rightness of info by consulting local experts
          • NOT peer-reviewed
            • content generated by everyone
              • powerful blog entries, social network sites
                • on the ground, in the country
                  • e- government
                    • press-interview transcripts
                      • official docs
                        • legislation
              • difficulty: factual/ OR individual opinion
        • form of group interview
          • 6-10 part., 8-52 groups
            • how ppl perceive info in context of social interaction
              • choice
                • less intervention
                  • aim: objective, empiricist research
                • more intervention
                  • aim: interpretative, qualitative research
      • gain factual data - phenomenon
        • gain perspective of interview participant
          • to learn more about their behavior
        • #1 structured interview
          • to produce quantitative research data
            • participant 'select' responses
              • pre-written interview Q and categories of responses
                • the script must be followed
                  • ANY deviation distorts findings
                    • due to structured appr. = missing out on essential insights
          • #2 semi structured interview (* most common) = structure + openness
            • target elites
              • to explain behavior of Intl Org, MNC, NGO
              • to explain foreign policy of states/political event
              • = position of influence
              • cross-referencing (Vglbarkeit)
                • script can be extended by researcher's add. Q
                  • #3 unstructured interviews
                    • :) unfiltered perspectives of intv. participant
                      • broad-open ended questions
                        • complex, unstructured responses
                          • must be recorded/no note taking
                            • researcher: no leading function
                    • COL armed conflict: security daily life 50y.a./now
  5. Data Analysis

    • Content analysis = hybrid
      • discourse analysis
        • =interpretation of linguistic forms of communication
          • official + unofficial discourse
            • language constructs the world = plays a "performative role"
              • => identities formed through intersubjective understanding
                • = to understand WHY and HOW particular discourse EMERGES, BECAME DOMINANT, IS USED BY OTHERS
                  • speeches. documents. declarations
                    • #1 selection criteria
            • what do we expect to find in them?
            • =on behalf of Organizat/state
            • issue = representativeness
          • Discourse = NO categorization
            • = to understand WHY and HOW actors resorted to specific discourse
              • Q: Who is identified as {...}
                • Q: How does the discourse legitimizde/delegitimize certain course of action?
                  • Q: How does discourse make possible certain policy choices?
                    • Q: In which ways does this discourse limit and enable choices/behavior?
                    • = relationship btw discourse and cognitive psychology
                      • = relationship btw discourse and power -> how it empowers and disempowers certain groups (Focault)
                        • = relationship discourse and the context
                          • the negotiation of agency, responsibility and blame
                            • the role of hegemonic discourses in shaping the others’ problems and the solutions to them
                              • the effects of discourses in shaping experiences and views in postcolonial society
                                • how inferiority is constructed in public texts, including policy, media and cultural texts
                  • What is hidden?
      • textual data/photos/TV prog/art into numbers
        • #2 categorization
          • coding
            • finding synonyms representing the concept
              • armed conflict = #violence #fear #post-trauma #accountability
              • counting of he/she (gender)
                • counting we/they (categories)
                • aim: identifying specific trends/patterns
                  • in communication
          • deductive
            • creation of categories in advance
              • C1 FARC. C2 GOVT C3 COL C4 NGO
                • aim: to discern correlations via statistics
            • inductive
              • identification of categories while reading
                • aim: to use data descriptively
        • EXP: media coverage of an issue
        • #1. selection criteria
          • (inter)national coverage
            • language
              • timeframe

Informações

Descrição
Mapa Mental sobre Qualitative Methods, criado por Tere S. em 24-03-2017.
Criado por
Tere S. · mar 2017
Atualizado
24 mar 2017
Visualizações
0
Avaliação

Fale Conosco

Sobre o que é sua mensagem?

O que você acha do novo visual?

Você gostou?