Mapa mental
Judiciary - Part 1
Conteúdo do mapa
Judiciary - Part 1
Fusion of Powers
- Constitutional Reform Act (2005)
- Creation of Supreme Court
- Hears appeals
- Final court of appeal in England, Wales and NI
- Arguable points of law of general public importantce
- Civil cases from whole of UK
- Criminal cases from all but Scotland
- Assumed the devolution jurisdiction of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
- Makes the Supreme Court the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
- Strengthened the separation of powers
- Law Lords were the highest court of appeal. They sat in the House of Lords
- The post of Lord chancellor has been merged with the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs
- Was head of the judiciary, presiding officer of the House of Lords and a cabinet minister
- The Lord Chief Justice has now become the head of the judiciary
- Came into existence in 2009
- Hears appeals
- Removed the Law Lords from the House of Lords
- Often did not debate on common issues
- However, were very vocal on issues regarding the judiciary
- Often did not debate on common issues
- Creation of Supreme Court
- Constitutional Reform Act (2005)
What do judges do?
- Preside over court proceedings
- Act as "umpires", so that the rules of the court are followed
- Interpret and apply the law
- Can lead to conflicts between ministers and judges
- THERESA MAY AND ABU QATADA
- Can lead to conflicts between ministers and judges
- Make law through interpretation of common law
- Accept previous interpretations as binding - "case law"
- Decide sentencing in criminal cases
- Role has been reduced in recent years due to increase in mandatory laws
- Politicians encroaching on the role of judges
- Interpretation of severity
- Role has been reduced in recent years due to increase in mandatory laws
- Chair public inquiries and commissions
- Reputation for being neutral and independent
- Can come into contact with ministers
- Bias may eventuate
- LEVESON INQUIRY
- Preside over court proceedings
The Rule of Law
- No one is above the law
- Prerogative powers are not subject to oversight by the judiciary
- Laws can be changed or scrapped by Parliament
- Queen, as head of the legal system, is not properly subject to the law
- Parliamentary privilege means that things that are said in Parliament are not subject to legal restrictions
- Equality before the law
- All citizens must be treated alike
- Legal disputes are costly, only accessible to the rich
- Coalition government just scrapped legal aid
- Judges may be biased
- The law is always applied
- A certainty of punishment for breaches of law
- Only for breaches, no persecution
- Due process
- Not all crimes are reported
- Most cases of rape
- Crimes are not detected because of limited police resources
- "Trial by the media" - punished even without legal proceedings or even when acquitted
- A certainty of punishment for breaches of law
- Legal redress is available through the courts
- If rights have been infringed
- Protects the individual from the State
- No entrenched bill of rights
- The HRA can be set aside by Parliament
- Access to ECHR is expensive and takes time
- No one is above the law
Informações
- Descrição
- A-Levels Politics (Judiciary) Mapa Mental sobre Judiciary - Part 1, criado por phopper31 em 05-05-2013.
- Criado por
- phopper31
- Visualizações
- 103
- Tags
- Avaliação